MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Who will justify voting for this person?
Comments
Some thoughts on this and other immanent confirmation hearings.
by A Guy Called LULU on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 11:03am
The problem the country faces is the people making the appointments. Trump and the Republicans will never appoint quality people. Until we get rid of the real problem, the Congressional Republicans. we are just going through the motions. Tom Cotton, the Senator from Arkansas, was among the possibilities. Cotton is not a better option.
by rmrd0000 on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 11:07am
Can you imagine that Democrats are any part of the problem. These appointees won't won't get confirmed without Democratic votes like they got last time. Cotton is horrible choice for any position in foreign policy. I predict he will be appointed to one before Trump leaves office. I don't see reason to believe that any Democrat who can justify voting to confirm either Haspel or Pompeo would fail to find a way to justify confirming Cotton.
by A Guy Called LULU on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 11:39am
Democrats are a problem. Some will vote for conformation of undesirable people. If they block the undesirable another undesirable will be appointed to the job. My solution is to get rid of the folks appointing the undesirables. I can get rid of Democrats who will vote for undesirable people, or I can get rid of Republicans who appoint undesirable people. Attacking the appointment part of the problems seems to most efficient method. Beauregard Sessions, Ben Carson, Rick Perry, Betsy DeVos, etc. would not have been appointed by Hillary.
by rmrd0000 on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 3:13pm
Dems & the woman who covered up torture.
Obstruction of justice, and destruction of humanity.
Wanton destruction of evidence should not be rewarded. There has to be someone better.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 6:46pm
She is completely unacceptable on moral, ethical, and legal grounds. She has committed crimes against our national laws and against international law. Christians can pile on with some laws of their own. Of course there is somebody better. Doing the right thing and blocking her would not guarantee getting someone better but it is still the right thing to do. I see a bigger risk of a Democratic candidate losing votes because they had voted to confirm her than if they voted against confirmation. If that is so then what is their excuse, or rather their reason, to vote for her. I see no excuse.
edited a misspelled word.
by A Guy Called LULU on Fri, 03/16/2018 - 7:45pm