MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The stakes are high not only for the GPS industry and its users, but also for those who would use LightSquared's network. In approving it, the Federal Communications Commission seeks to boost wireless competition and bring faster and cheaper Internet connections to all Americans — even in remote corners of the country.
LightSquared and the FCC both insist the new network can co-exist with GPS systems. But device makers fear GPS signals will suffer the way a radio station can get drowned out by a stronger broadcast in a nearby channel.
The problem, they say, is that sensitive satellite receivers — designed to pick up relatively weak signals coming from space — could be overwhelmed when LightSquared starts sending high-power signals from as many as 40,000 transmitters on the ground using the airwaves next door.
"The potential impact of GPS interference is so vast, it's hard to get your head around," said Jim Kirkland, vice president and general counsel of Trimble Navigation Ltd., which makes GPS systems. "Think 40,000 GPS dead spots covering millions of square miles in cities and towns throughout the U.S."
[As if we didn't have enough to worry about.]
Comments
This is a known issue with military contractors providing equipment and services to the US military...everything using the electromagnetic spectrum, especially at or near cell phone frequencies, walking all over each other. The only problem is GPS is King, so everyone else will have to suck hind tit. In other words, the US Military is so dependent upon GPS, there's no alternative. The plain old simple telephone used 3000 Hz for voice with a passband of 500 Hz on either side (4000 Hz total) so as to isolate one subscriber from another...and that didn't always work - many people could pick up crosstalk from those subscribers adjacent to them. Sounds like there are serious issues at the higher frequencies simple passbands aren't capable of isolating effectively. And those higher frequencies are more expensive to effectively engineer solutions that could make the venture too costly to pursue.
by Beetlejuice on Fri, 04/08/2011 - 8:10pm
Oh we have the pass-band issue OK. It's the front ends that are the problem. Strong signals can overload them and cause IMD and mixing products which mess things up badly.
by cmaukonen on Fri, 04/08/2011 - 9:17pm
From what I read in the article, they're using sat comm frequencies in which GPS occupies and has has always been a sore point for the military...bleed over from comerical products and users. Perhaps the solution would be for the FCC to designate a specific and unique frequency band strictly for a nationwide broadband network isolated so it doesn't interfere with others.
by Beetlejuice on Fri, 04/08/2011 - 10:05pm