Book of the Month

From the Dagbloggers

Articleman's picture

Romney: Let Detroit Go Bankrupt

He likes to fire people.

Read the full article at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html

Winding up to be one of the top ten political blunders of all time.  Who would have thought that calling for a economically struggling region to struggle even more might come back to haunt one.

For those old enough or with memories of longer than 30 second attack ads, the Republicans had the same sinister predictions of imminent economic doom when Clinton and the Democrats raised taxes on the rich 5% or so in 1992-3, with every Republican in Congress voting against it.

You know what happened next, they dropped talking about the reviving ,and then booming, economy, and switched to try the gambit of impeaching Bill for the huge unAmerican act and national security threat of 'lying' about sex.

The GOP is pushing the culture war to the extreme right now too because they don't have a economic message that works.

The current plan becomes clear: Santorum can have the blue dog union guys & good riddance to them; Romney's going for the Scott Walker conservatives:

Romney bashes auto union leaders in Michigan
By Sarah B. Boxer, Political Hotsheet, Feb 15

Updated 11:04 p.m. ET

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. - Campaigning in Michigan, a labor stronghold, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney bashed union leaders and their ties to the Obama White House, calling the bailout of the auto industry payback for its bosses contributions to the president's campaign in 2008.

As his rival, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, courts the blue-collar vote in the state, Romney has launched a full-force attack on unions and the 2009 bailout of the auto industry. At a rally in Grand Rapids, a generally conservative part of the state, Romney said that Obama got "hundreds of millions" from labor bosses during his campaign "and so he's paying them back in every way he knows how. One way, of course, was giving General Motors and Chrysler to the UAW."[....]

So no excuses for the 2008 editorial, he's proud of it, and it does certainly fit with his main sales pitch all along, that he knows how to help private business "thrive and survive" without government bailouts

It's 100% clear now that Mitt doesn't want union support, just the opposite:

Risking union ire, Romney slams Santorum’s labor votes
February 17, 2012|By Michael Levenson, Globe Staff

Mitt Romney is taking an antiunion stance in Michigan, attacking Rick Santorum for his “unapologetic defense of big labor’’ as part of a new attempt to paint his rival as beholden to a powerful Democratic ally.

Romney is seizing on votes Santorum took in the Senate against national right-to-work legislation and in support of the Davis-Bacon Act, which requires government contractors to pay the prevailing wage. Both votes reflected the positions of organized labor.

“I’ve taken on union bosses before, and I’m happy to take them on again because I happen to believe that you can protect the interests of American taxpayers, and you can protect a great industry like automobiles without having to give in to the UAW [United Auto Workers], and I sure won’t,’’ Romney said Wednesday [....]

While the 2008 editorial suggests some of this is true ideological stance, the cynical me would also suspect some studying of how the blue dog vote is not worth it this time, that much of it would go to Obama? That would mean a electoral strategy that includes a willingness from the getgo to risk losing Michigan in the primary?

Latest Comments