MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
MOSCOW — Russia said Thursday its dispute with the United States over missile defence was near a “dead end” and warned it might have to deploy new rockets in Europe to take out elements of the controversial shield.
“We have not been able to find mutually-acceptable solutions at this point and the situation is practically at a dead end,” Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov told a televised conference on missile defence issues.
The comments came just hours before Russian generals were to sit down for crunch talks with a special team Washington dispatched ahead of next month’s official deployment of the first elements of the new shield.
Russia has argued vehemently against a defence system the United States is deploying to protect its European allies against any attack from enemy states such as Iran that the West fears are seeking to develop a nuclear weapon.
Officials in Moscow fear the shield may harm its own nuclear deterrence and have warned of unleashing a massive new armament programme if Washington failed to allay its concerns.
[Submitters comment: I believe this was how the Cuban Missile crisis began. With the US Stationing MRBM in Turkey.]
Comments
I wish you hadn't repeated Raw Story's sensationalist headline, c.
Nobody's going to war over this, but I fail to understand what the U.S. hopes to get out of needlessly provoking and antagonizing the Russians. A shield against potential nuclear-armed Iranian missiles that follows Russia's borders from the Black Sea to the Baltic? Putin rightly isn't buying it; I wonder there's any thinking person in the entire world who does.
The Cold War is over, but American Cold Warriors have too big a financial interest to let it slip into history. Helluva principle to build foreign policy around.
by acanuck on Fri, 05/04/2012 - 6:48pm
It is what was reported on RT an in an interview with a leading Russian.
by cmaukonen on Fri, 05/04/2012 - 7:05pm
I was objecting to the Raw Story headline. What the Russians are threatening to do, "as one of our options," is station short-range missiles closer to its western borders to counter what it rightly sees as an aggressive move against it.
No one is threatening a "pre-emptive strike." The original Agence France Presse headline was more accurate: "Russia warns it may target US missile shield." Tit-for-tat. Not the same thing.
It's a chess game -- a stupid and pointless one, but one the West is forcing the Russians to play. It has nothing to do with actual military strategy, and everything to do with currying favor among former Soviet Bloc countries -- UN votes, resource deals, economic co-operation, whatever.
So much for pushing the "reset" button on relations with Russia.
by acanuck on Fri, 05/04/2012 - 11:37pm