MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Why don’t people like the mayor of America’s largest city? There’s no single explanation.
Policy-wise, a lot of de Blasio’s record is strong, and he’s essentially delivered on what he set out to do when campaigning for mayor: He delivered universal pre-K and expanded paid sick leave, reduced stop-and-frisk policing, and oversaw the city’s $15 minimum wage hike. New York’s economy is strong and crime rates are low, though homelessness remains a problem. De Blasio has steadily progressed up New York City’s political ranks over 30 years and was reelected mayor in 2017 with 67 percent of the vote. As FiveThirtyEight’s Chadwick Matlin notes, de Blasio “was progressive before it was cool.”
Rather, de Blasio’s issue largely seems to be one of style. De Blasio can come off as sanctimonious, arrogant, stubborn, and preachy about the gravity and scope of what he’s doing. He can be perceived as caring more about big-picture symbolism than the day-to-day grind of city policy, and he’s not particularly charismatic. To make matters worse, he has a fractious relationship with the New York press — which tends to drip out into national media, since so many media companies are based in New York — and neither he nor they seem particularly inclined to try to fix it. And to some extent, New Yorkers are always going to hate the mayor they have, whoever it is.
“The issue is people don’t like him, and he doesn’t care,” said Rebecca Katz, a former longtime de Blasio adviser and founder of consulting firm New Deal Strategies. She added, “In terms of New York City being a beacon of progressive leadership, he’s made some really strong strides, but his personality has left some to be desired.”
Comments
Move on, nothing to see here, I'm sure, published by a traitorous Dem tabloid, tweeted by a CNN reporter in NY, and just retweeted by Maggie Haberman, all of whom are mistakenly under the impression that he's one of those "pay to play" type guys, they just don't realize it's just his personality grating on them:
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:32am
Kaczinski of CNN rubbing in the pay-to-play money point by stooping to tweet the NYPost:
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 1:36am
Like governor, like mayor. https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2018/07/19/cuomos-dozen-his-top-donors-and-their-six-figure-generosity-518533
And yet Cuomo isn't widely despised the way De Blasio is. Why not?
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 10:11am
I think it's like this: yes, a lot of just folks don't like him for the personality thing--the doofus factor. Cuomo is not seen as a doofus by "just folks." Rightly so, he's far savvier.
The professional media on the other hand, as opposed to "just folks", especially the ones located in NY, even if local politics is not their beat, know about the NY Dem machine from their colleagues and experience and can see DeBlasio is clearly a cog in it and an ambitious doofus to boot, very shallow, and don't trust a single thing about him or anything he does. They figure power players with money are always pulling him this way or that.
The professional media are cynical about Cuomo too, but see that he's far savvier and doesn't try to hide much, loud and proud about playing the whole politics game. Professionals see professionals there.
Given that you want clicks and a big audience for your reporting, it makes sense to research and write about what the doofus is up to and who may be playing him. As opposed to just another article researching what the pro from Dover is up to, which readers will react to like this "oh another article about corruption in Albany, so what else is new?"
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:19pm
P.S. Had another thought thinking of my fellow Bronxites after reading about the Garner story and thinking about activist leaders like say, Rev. Al. As to "just folks". I ain't got no polls to back it up, except perhaps this type of thing, where Cynthia Nixon just couldn't raise enough trust to convince a lot of the African American vote. Just folks of color in NYC don't seem to to trust or like the white radical bleeding heart type, especially if they are big dumb white liberal doofuses, even if they are married to African Americans and have mixed race children. They like old style Dem pros like Biden and Cuomo who have shown their true colors as regards racism over time,whether good or bad. Again, thinking of my fellow Bronxites here. I don't hear a single good word about DeBlasio, and I do mean never. There's a phoniness, a lack of depth, I don't know how to describe it. Except perhaps to say the Sesame Street Big Bird comparison is apt as to how he comes across: only a naive child would fall for the world being like that.
I definitely disagree with the Vox writer on this front. I think she is wrong that it's all about elite whites disliking DeBlasio. A lot of the opposite, actually. I think working class see him as dumb white elite with no street smarts. Falling for crooked shit without even fully knowing he's doing it. You can "put one over" on a guy like him real easy. Example: NYPD walk all over him and he just lets it happen. Says it's not his fault. Well why not? Ain't you got any power? And you think you can be president!?
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 2:06pm
The polls beg to differ. De Blasio is far more popular among African-Americans than among whites. In fact the Bronx is the only borough where he has a positive favorability rating. (His worst borough is Staten Island.)
I think your comparison between suave Cuomo and Big Bird de Blasio is apt, though. Imho, Cuomo is actually phonier than de Blasio, but he's so much smoother that he can get away with it. Which comes back to personality and charisma.
I do take your point about journalists basing their judgments on more substantial grounds than "just folks," but journalists aren't immune to bias. They get prickly when they feel disrespected, and they like to please their audiences--especially tabloid journalists.
That said, I'm not faulting journalists for criticizing him. All I'm saying is that his unpopularity is disproportionate to his record, at least relative to other politicians.
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 5:36pm
So the current headline over at TheRoot.com is not about Trump:
On 5th Anniversary of Eric Garner’s Death, Protesters Will Take to New York City’s Streets Once More
with TheRoot video titled with huge caps:ERIC GARNER'S FAMILY CALLS OUT DEBLASIO
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 1:32am
Correcting the DeBlasio b.s. spin of his record and trying to pass the buck on Garner, by the NYTimes' Metro
reporter:
Comes to mind he often does the pass the buck shit. It's always someone else did the wrong thing. Not his purview. His purview: climbing in the Dem machine. Managing if there's no payola of some kind involved? fuggeaboutit.
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 1:52am
The technical term to define De Blasio (Pace, Daniel Ortega):
A fuckin' weasel
by jollyroger on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 4:54pm