MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
I heard a few interviews of Snowden and read some of the comments that he has made. And, it appears to me that he saw what had happened to US and what they tried to do to us plus what happened to Manning, and all that told him that proper channels don’t work [Snowden has said that he is familiar with Binney, Drake, Manning and other whistleblowers]. So, I think he made his decision on that basis. That is, our government will attack the whistleblowers rather than address the problems they expose.
Comments
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 06/27/2013 - 10:19am
And the subtle difference is that Drake was simply exposing waste and fraud, not dealing with intelligence issues. And that made him an enemy non-combatant.
But use the official complaint lines Romana says.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 06/27/2013 - 2:25pm
Yeah, the answer to this is just too obvious. The "proper channels" are part of the corrupt system. They can't be trusted.
by Michael Maiello on Thu, 06/27/2013 - 11:28am
I haven't really followed much of this story but what Michael said. If the President of the United States is operating the government as one big espionage system aimed at its own citizens, what is the point of complaining about that to the President of the United States? That really is an insane question.
by Orion on Thu, 06/27/2013 - 10:49pm
Does anyone seriously believe Snowden's leaks are actually changing anything permanently? Snowden has only changed his future prospects in life.
And I like the 'almost leaker' Binney guy saying 'Snowden did the right thing', my ass, why didn't Binney do 'the right thing' and then and buy himself a one way ticket to China?
Changing anything would mean Congress would have to do it's job, not BS partisan attacks on Benghazi or the IRS, or repeal Obamacare 37 times, or write more unborn protection laws. That absence of devotion to their responsibilities in oversight, and voters who don't care if all they do is play partisan politics, combined with the 30 second attention span of Americans ensures that nothing much is going to happen.
In the end, the NSA is so poorly run ( a 3 month wonder can hack the outfit from top to bottom) it is frankly no more threat to your privacy, and 99.9999% of no use to national security, than your kid's latest X-Box. Let them have their toys, it's inevitable the government will tap 'metadata' because every corporation, nation and entity on the planet that possibly can is doing the same thing.
If Snowden or anyone else did leak evidence of actual crimes at NSA, illegal use of the data to harm innocent people for instance, the Party out of power would be hopping like horny toads off a hot skillet demanding hearings and investigations.
by NCD on Fri, 06/28/2013 - 12:07am
Note: you've gone on and on about Assange being a bloodsucker, but don't seem to know Adrian Lamo, who appears to be real vampire thing. (along with Kevin Poulson of Wired - "hack a site, then report it to let us clean it up" - uh, would be nice to offer a penetration test as a contract, not just do it in the wild)
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 06/28/2013 - 3:03am