Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner
Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45
Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election
|
Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45 Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election |
Read |
With all respect to my friend and fellow dagblogger Genghis, I must respectfully disagree. I'd leave a comment in his thread, but my comment is too long and we've had issues recently where Genghis is intemperately editing comments in "his" threads, so to avoid any disagreements of those sorts, I will make this as clear as I can in a separate blog entry: Glenn Beck doesn't matter, and the progressive community's unhealthy obsession with him is a destructive distraction from Things That Do Matter. Here's why:
First, there is always going to be a political opposition. FOX News is a major cluster of the opposition to the President. Now, I like and admire the President. But the natural course of things is that there will be media outlets opposed to the party and President in power. Through his increasing unpopularity, George W. Bush promoted MSNBC more than MSNBC could have promoted itself otherwise. And with Democrats in control of both the Presidency and Congress, it is the natural order of things that there will be an uptick in attention to political media that focus upon criticizing the party in power. People who suggest that Beck and those who espouse his consistently antiprogressive views must be stamped out or silenced remind me of defense lawyers who wish the plaintiff's bar did not exist. Without plaintiffs, what cases would there be to defend? There will always be two sides in our great arguments. And also, some people who bring discredit upon each side in all of our great arguments...
Second, Glenn Beck does not bring credit upon the conservative cause he purports to promote. He says a lot of stupid things that are a discredit to him and make reasonable people ignore him. He's deservedly infamous for saying that President Obama is a racist with "deep seated hatred for white people or the white culture." (Actually, Glenn, he's half white! And was closer in his premarital life to his white mom than anyone.) Earth to jerk: President Obama is not a racist, and is staunchly antiracist. Most Americans get this. Many of his former sponsors get this: Beck's been dropped by GEICO, lawyers.com, Progressive, ConAgra, and Procter and Gamble, who weren't ok with the way Beck chose to slur the President. The people who show up to listen to the ranting of a man who says things like that about the President are going to show up. There is no point making a daily event out of the fact of their showing up. And don't get me started on how Beck can't even spell oligarch, and doesn't know what it means.
Third, it takes two to make the current echo chamber in our fractionated media. We have Olbermann, who each night explains that O'Reilly, Beck, Limbaugh, and [rotating fourth person among Michelle Bachmann, Michael Steele, or actually someone not ordinarily mentioned] are the Worst Persons in the World. Beck and Limbaugh in particular do the same thing back, jeering the President and his supporters in the same hateful, antidialogic way Olbermann does. I say they are all debasing our political culture. As the aphorism goes, and as one sees in legal practice with lawyers who live to attack meanly, you shouldn't wrestle with a pig. It just gets you muddy, and the pig likes it. So let's not wrestle pigs. Or be them. Ok?
Fourth, rolling these points together: generalized advocacy and opposition that devolves to cheerleading for the left or right is not valuable discussion. MSNBC's Keith and Ed, and FOX's evening lineup, exist to affirm belief systems in those who don't really need affirmation, and seldom do anything truly interesting with issues of the day. These commentators and their core audiences know what they think and how they'll vote. So why waste one's daily or weekly political thinking, viewing, or listening time on such repetition?
Here's my problem: I hear so much more about Beck than immigration, EFCA, the judiciary, Waxman-Markey, really, name your bill or issue. There's a limited amount of time to think about our politics, and the left is spending it shocked and aghast that the right has often-abrasive, thoughtless cheerleaders (surprise, just as the left does). I am sick of the focus on these cheerleader people, and sick of their focus on each other. Immigration is interesting. EFCA is interesting. Tort reform is interesting. The judiciary is interesting. Climate change is interesting. Fuel standards for cars and energy independence are interesting.
Glenn Beck is not interesting. And other than health care, all our political media can talk about right now is Glenn Beck. As his namesake pop singer, Beck, sang of himself, he's a loser, baby. Let's talk about something more serious, something that matters more, and that can change minds or lives. Now that would be interesting. That would matter.
By Nancy Benac, Associated Press, May 16, 2012
After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses
Note to self: you think you're so smart about this kinda stuff, but you yourself fell for it once again.....so much for all the prognostication about one of our political parties disintegrating from all the primary campaign animosity.
Pew Resarch Center for the People and the Press, May 15, 2012
For decades survey research has provided trusted data about political attitudes and voting behavior, the economy, health, education, demography and many other topics. But political and media surveys are facing significant challenges as a consequence of societal and technological changes.
It has become increasingly difficult to contact potential respondents and to persuade them to participate. The percentage of households in a sample that are successfully interviewed – the response rate – has fallen dramatically. At Pew Research, the response rate of a typical telephone survey was 36% in 1997 and is just 9% today. The general decline in response rates is evident across nearly all types of surveys, in the United States and abroad. At the same time, greater effort and expense are required to achieve even the diminished response rates of today. These challenges have led many to question whether surveys are still providing accurate and unbiased information [....]
On May 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, the Ride of Silence will begin in North America and roll across the globe. Cyclists will take to the roads in a silent procession to honor cyclists who have been killed or injured while cycling on public roadways. Although cyclists have a legal right to share the road with motorists, the motoring public often isn't aware of these rights, and sometimes not aware of the cyclists themselves.
...
The Ride of Silence is a free ride that asks its cyclists to ride no faster than 12 mph, wear helmets, follow the rules of the road and remain silent during the ride. There are no sponsors and no registration fees. The ride, which is held during National Bike Month, aims to raise the awareness of motorists, police and city officials that cyclists have a legal right to the public roadways. The ride is also a chance to show respect for and honor the lives of those who have been killed or injured.
A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
"Our findings illustrate that what you eat affects how you think," said Fernando Gomez-Pinilla, a professor of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a professor of integrative biology and physiology in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Eating a high-fructose diet over the long term alters your brain's ability to learn and remember information. But adding omega-3 fatty acids to your meals can help minimize the damage."
While earlier research has revealed how fructose harms the body through its role in diabetes, obesity and fatty liver, this study is the first to uncover how the sweetener influences the brain.
The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
[Better write this down]
Christopher Doyon, a.k.a. Commander X, sits atop a hillside in an undisclosed location in Canada, watching a reporter and photographer make their way along a narrow path to join him, away from the prying eyes of law enforcement.
It’s been a few weeks of encrypted emails back and forth, working out the security protocol to follow for interviewing Doyon, one of the brains behind Anonymous, now a fugitive from the FBI.
Doyon, who readily admits taking part in some of the highest-profile hacktivist attacks on websites last year — from Tunisia to Orlando, Sony to PayPal — was arrested in September for a comparatively minor assault on the county website of Santa Cruz, Calif., where he was living, in retaliation for the town forcibly removing a homeless encampment on the courthouse steps.
The “virtual sit-in” lasted half an hour. For that, Doyon is facing 15 years in jail.