Ramona's picture

    Keeping Down with the Joneses was Never Going to Work Anyway

     

    Months before the Republican and Democratic Conventions in the summer of 2012, when politicians fell all over each other trying to out-Poor-Me-Before-the-Bootstrap-Thing, Mitt Romney, Republican presidential candidate, had already had enough of pretending he was one of the little people.  (Did you notice it was Ann Romney and not Mitt who told the tale about having to live in a ceement basement when they were in college, poor as church-mice except for those stocks they could cash in whenever they ran out of Ramen Noodles?)

    In the merry month of May, Mitt went for the gold at a $50,000-a-plate dinner, raising a haughty middle finger to the riff-raff, the losers, the leeches--the only Americans so useless they would actually vote for  Barack Obama.

    He laid it all out there, and--you have to give it to him--he seemed pretty comfortable up there.  He hardly stuttered at all :

    There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.

    Ouch!  You talking 'bout me? (Water off my back, pal, water off my back.)  But did you see how the Republicans took it?  Man, you would think they didn't actually believe any of it themselves.  The thing is, you never, ever say such things out loud! (Rove Playbook, page 3, paragraph 1, or thereabouts)

    You almost have to feel sorry for Mitt.  He was born rich and got even richer, which should be the American Dream, shouldn't it?  So why is everybody making fun of his richness?  Haven't we had rich presidents before?

    Well, yes we have.  Almost every president came from backgrounds most of us couldn't even begin to hope for.  At least two of them, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Fitzgerald Kennedy, were so whopping wealthy it was almost other-worldly.  The thing is (Mitt, I'm talking to you), it didn't matter.  Once they became public servants (Yes, Mitt, I said public servants) they took their obligations seriously.

    FDR and JFK didn't exploit their wealth; neither did they hide it.  They came from families whose wealth was unimaginable to the rest of us, but it didn't matter because they were both presidents who didn't talk down to the middle-class and the poor, who didn't propose cutting social programs in times of need, who didn't cater to the rich simply because the rich expected it from them.
     

    Picture this:  FDR with a pince nez and a mile-long cigarette holder--not often seen in most neighborhoods. His speech patterns were decidedly (and sometimes hilariously) patrician.  He was elected in 1932, at the height of the Great Depression, by voters who often didn't know where their next meal was coming from.  It should have been a squeaker of an election, considering how he must have looked to the masses, but he won in a landslide.  It wasn't how he spoke but what he said.  He built up their hopes without ever talking down to them.  They trusted him.  He understood that the depression they were suffering through wasn't their fault, and when he talked about "victims", it wasn't to blame them but to assure them that he was there to do something about it.

    The Kennedys played football on lawns the size of small states at the family compound.  They sailed the blue waters off Hyannis Port in yachts fit for potentates. Jackie wore gorgeous clothes designed by Adrian and was often seen at Paris runways rooting for high fashion couturiers.  And American manufacturing output was the envy of the world, the majority of the country counted themselves as middle class, health costs were reasonable, and children were being educated without fear of failure or budget cuts.  We woke up to the need for civil rights, we established the Peace Corps, and we took giant steps toward space travel.

    FDR and JFK didn't exactly become one of us, and they didn't even try, but we all knew they were our champions. That's the difference.
     
    Mitt?  You listening?  That's the difference.

     

    Kevin Siers - Charlotte Observer

     

    (Cross-posted at Ramona's Voices)

    Topics: 

    Comments

    Deep down, Romney seems to believe that his business success and resultant wealth qualifies him for the presidency and damn the voters who don't agree.  I actually wonder if he'd step aside were a richer Republican running.

    Because of Paul Ryan, they can't say so loudly anymore but Republicans love to argue that working in government isn't a "real job."  JFK and FDR, as you point out, would not have agreed.  But to Romney, the idea of some sort of lifelong interest in governance is alien.  Being president is something you do after your real work.  For fun!


    A HEARTY MIDDLE FINGER?

    hahahahaahaha

    Well put!


    What gets me the most about this quote is this line " who believe that they are entitled...... to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it." He practically spits out the word entitled and takes a long pause before continuing.The whole thing just drips of contempt.


    This is who he is, but I'm afraid his handlers will finally get through to him and he'll spend the next few weeks back-tracking, trying to look like a real president of the people and not a privileged rich guy. 

    People have short memories and the Democrats are terrible at remembering to remind them of the worst of the worst.  I'm not giving this election to Obama just yet.


    I just read today about the fact that Mitt and Ann Romney didn't work for two years after college and instead lived on cashed-in stocks. She tells the tale like it's some great hardship and I think it speaks volumes to how far removed they are from the experience of average Americans. Most recent college graduates who are not fortunate enough to immediately find jobs in their field don't have the luxury of cashing in stocks. They take whatever jobs they can find, doing whatever pays. I find offensive the fact that she thinks that her story of "hardship" will resonant with the middle class. I don't think she's charming. I don't think she's Mitt's better half. I think she's Marie Antoinette in new shoes.


    Ann and Mitt Romney are examples of the worst of the entitled rich.  Ann clearly thinks they deserve the presidency, not because of their good ideas, but because they're Ann and Mitt Romney and they want it.

    "Marie Antoinette in new shoes" is perfect!  Did you see this

    During an interview early this evening with Radio Iowa, Mrs. Romney directly addressed her fellow Republicans who’ve criticized her husband.

    “Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring,” she said. “This is hard and, you know, it’s an important thing that we’re doing right now and it’s an important election and it is time for all Americans to realize how significant this election is and how lucky we are to have someone with Mitt’s qualifications and experience and know-how to be able to have the opportunity to run this country.”


    You can almost hear underneath that "...and how lucky I am to have someone like Mitt allow me to be his adoring wife and mother to his children."


    I just realized she said Mitt should have the opportunity to "run this country".  As if it's a business and not a democratic republic.  As if it's Bain Capital, only bigger.

     


    I did see it. I find her distasteful. I know she's not the one running, but she's basically whining about how people should stop being mean to her husband. Even Barbara and Laura Bush never went there (that I saw, anyway). I think it's partially a result of always being at the top, surrounded by people who never say "no." Politics doesn't work that way, she's not used to it, and she doesn't like it. 


    And here is a perfect example:

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/09/ann-romney-to-criti...

    Talk about 'do as we say, not as we do'.................


    Nice post, Ramona. The Romneys really had it rough in graduate school, chipping away at the stocks his parents gave him, living with no rent---plenty of time to study. I worked in graduate school, 30 hours a week, installing computers. Our rental house was so dirty when we moved in that I washed the whole place down with a hose, wallpaper and all. Then I remember another place we moved into. A guy in the class ahead of me was so cheap he removed the brackets and curtain rods---about a thirty five cent item---from every window. I thought to myself, how stingy do you have to be to do something like that. I found out. He was a guy like Mitt. Went on to make billions in the IT world. I guess I just never got it.


    In the early 50s Edward R.Murrow and Fred Friendly produced an LP titled "I can hear it now". Recordings mostly from the 30s mostly of politicans.

    One was of FDR campaigning in Mass in 1936. In Worcester. On a boiling hot day, sitting in his roadster with its top down.

    His speech begins

    ..I've had a glorious day here in New England 

    I played it for my 70 year old father. He sat back in his chair and laughed and laughed in affectionate pleasure

    Of course Roosevelt hadn't had a glorious day. But he was safe saying that even tho it was clearly untrue. His listeners knew that, he knew they knew it, they knew that he knew they knew it.They were playing their parts in a familiar, enjoyable game.

    And then there was 1944 when he almost didn't campaign but went to the Teamsters convention.

    "not content with criticizing me, my son Eliott,my wife Eleanor..they even criticize....(in pathetic tones)   my   little   dog   Fala..."

    He had more to say but it was drowned out by cheers, applause and laughter.

    I,young republican listening on the kitchen radio, knew that Dewey had just lost the election.
     


    Latest Comments