MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
It may seem un-American to offer advice to the enemy but, if ever there was a win-win situation, this is it.
If Al Qaeda would like to win, all they have to do is copy our Vietnam experience, declare victory, and go home. The American people can finish your job. It will be peaceful, bloodless, and all of our objectives will be fulfilled.
Here is what I offer: follow the lead of the Irish Republic Army and Basque separatists by laying down your weapons and vowing to never fight again. If you wish, you can even borrow the line from one of the original Americans, Chief Joseph, and say “I will fight no more forever.” It will be a public relations coup for you and a better world for all of us.
The result will be to force the U.S. government into one of the most difficult decisions it can make: create and inflate a new enemy or start to dismantle the military/industrial/Congressional complex (Eisenhower’s grand-daughter, Susan, said “Congressional” was in the original draft of his warning). The United States is not good at peace. You’ll have us right where you want us - dazed and confused.
We now spend as much on defense and security as the rest of the world combined. Our spying on the world has been exposed by Snowden, Manning, and others. Germany is backing out of their intelligence agreements with them because they discovered we’re inveterate spy-ers even on our allies. Russia, Ecuador, and Venezuela offer sanctuary to Edward Snowden. Secretary of State John Kerry didn’t feel the love on his recent South American tour because of our espionage. The American people have lost faith in our government. Let’s face it, Al Qaeda, except for those lapdog British, we’re running out of friends. You have us surrounded. Declare peace.
The pressure would be squarely upon us. The government would have to explain why it needs to spend over fifty percent of its discretionary income on military, Homeland Security, the NSA, the CIA, the expanded TSA, and a host of other agencies run by the likes of Klapper (he smugly perjured Congress without consequence) and Hayden. Granted, 70% of the NSA’s budget is contracted out to for-profit contractors such as Booz Allen which is owned by the Carlyle Group which, in turn, is owned in part by the Bin Laden family and Dick Cheney. So, Al Qaeda, you’ll have to absorb a little pain, too.
Peace will necessitate we start bringing troops home and finding jobs for them. Peace requires we spend our money on infrastructure, fair markets, food integrity, schools, clean energy, health, and other low priority projects. Peace will require our Congress to work constructively and in a bipartisan manner to make the United States and the world a better place. Frankly, Al Qaeda, it has been so long, I don’t know if we can do it anymore.
So, Al Qaeda, bring the government to its knees. Declare peace and enforce it among your peers. We fear that more than war.
Comments
Heh. We've been here before. For a couple of years they spoke about the post Cold War "Peace Dividend" but it didn't take long before we were told that Saddam Hussein had amassed the worlds "fourth" (or maybe "third") largest army and we were off to building bombs again. Funny how they never mention that the world's first and second largest armies tend to be way, way, way, bigger than numbers three, four and five. It's like when a sixth grader is the third tallest person in the room, after the teacher, when an NBA center drops by the talk to the class.
Once these powers have been self assigned, they will not be given up. If Al-Qaeda lays down its arms, North Korea will become suddenly important. If people don't buy that, the entirety of the NSA will be turned towards stopping a sudden plague of mail and wire fraud. They will always find a reason.
by Michael Maiello on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 1:43pm
I'm afraid my cynicism is completely in line with what Maiello's written here.
by Verified Atheist on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 3:12pm
I think we should go back to the Russian well. They're much more reliable as bad guys.
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 6:41pm
Also easier to cast in movies.
by Michael Maiello on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 12:16pm
Al Qaeda is already at home.
It all started with War President GWB and his 'fightin' them there so we don't have to fight 'em here.....Bring 'em, on...' BS.
If we'd wise up and bring the troops home, AQ et al. will fall back on their usual pastime, killing each other.
by NCD on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 4:53pm
Al Qaeda doesn't have a homeland. They are not even a stateless people. They are a collection of believers committed to overturning the system of states in the Muslim world. The United States is only important to them as a factor in that system.
We are not at war with Al Qaeda; we just kill their people. We are not in a position to defeat them because their war is not with us or about us.
We are merely means to an end. We could make an effort to be less useful to them.
by moat on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 5:23pm
I believe this is what you call Magical Thinking. While I think Al Qaeda is a tool of US Empire they did state that the US would destroy itself and we are well on the way to validating that statement.
by Peter (not verified) on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 3:14pm
Could you explain how Al-Qaeda is a tool of the West?
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 3:50pm
Oh I sooo know this answer! The oligarchy uses fear of Al Qaeda to manipulate the masses into endorsing empire re-enforcing activities.
Beware: it's not possible to win any arguments against this theory because Al Qaeda also wishes to manipulate western masses into empire-reinforcing activities, in order to inspire the ummah to join jihad against the same. You get into a chicken-or-the-egg type of situation as to who is the tool.
by artappraiser on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 5:02pm
Is the chicken participating in the meal (scrambled eggs) or is the chicken committed to the meal (fried chicken)?
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 5:11pm
Several years back, I read through a whole lot of "Islamists" sites. I mean a lot; more than a hundred. The CIA support for the mujahadeen in Afghanistan during the fight with the Soviet Union is where most of the tool language is based upon.
I saw a lot of references to a Wahhabi agenda that only referenced the US as a supporter of Saudi Arabia. And these references mostly came from the Sufi in Central Asia who see themselves as under siege by the Wahhabi. From what I have read, they are.
Some Iraqi Sunni expelled many Al Qaeda elements with US help. Does that make them our allies?
I mention these bits only as examples, not as an argument that such and such is the situation. The situation is complicated. Allies on one level are working against each other on other levels.
Enter Machiavelli.
by moat on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 8:14pm
Does this mean Peter is one of the 9/11 Truthers? I lost patience with them a long time ago.
by Aaron Carine on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 5:33pm
Golly... Gee willikers... Quack Quack . . .
This whole dealio about Al Qaeda was much simpler back in 2005 . . .
~OGD~
by oldenGoldenDecoy on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 5:13pm
Simpler but less true.
by moat on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 8:19pm
You and I and many here may know that . . .
But the simpletons it was directed at didn't have a clue it was untrue.
~OGD~
by oldenGoldenDecoy on Thu, 08/22/2013 - 1:27am