Wattree's picture

    The American Propaganda Machine

    BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

    The American Propaganda Machine
    The American propaganda machine tells us that Muslims are a hostile people who hate American freedom. The most cursory examination of that claim reveals that the evidence the claim is based upon is highly flawed, yet the American people have been persuaded that it's true. That suggests that the American people have learned nothing from our experience with the Nazi's, and it also suggests that the biggest threat to America is the propaganda machine itself.

     

    The primary argument against the claim that Muslims are inherently hostile toward America is the fact that we had absolutely no problem with Muslims at all until we, Western "Christians" and "Jews," began our imperialistic excursion into the Middle East. Prior to that time Muslims were content to be left alone to practice their religion in their own lands.
    *
    So when we consider Muslim hostility towards America we must keep two things in mind. First, we need to consider all the hell we're raising over the loss of 3000 citizens during 9/11. If we've been impacted to our core over the loss of 3000 of Americans, how do you think Muslims feel over the loss of hundreds of thousands of their people resulting from the unjust and illegal invasion of Iraq? And secondly, we must remember that while we're quick to call Muslims aggressors, we're invading their countries, they're not invading ours.

    Atomic Bomb victimAmericans tend to believe that American lives are more valuable than the lives of other people. When Americans are killed we never stop talking about it. It, literally, goes down in the history books. But when we kill innocent women and children in other countries we simply say, "Oops, sorry 'bout that," then expect the people to forget about it.

    *
    Look at what Obama said about Bush and Cheney's war crimes - "We want to look forward, not back." What the hell is he talking about? Bush killed close to a million people for nothing more than corporate greed. How can we expect to dismiss the killing of a million men, women, and children by simply saying, let's let bygones be bygones? One can only wonder if Obama would have taken that position if his family had been among that million? Somehow, I doubt it.
    *
    It was that one remark that opened my eyes regarding our president. While I consider Obama the best that we've got, I also recognize that he's far from an angel.  The remark served to remind me that Obama is also the product of a propaganda machine - his own. So while I continue to support Obama, I never allow myself to forget that even though he's an impressive man, he's also a politician, not the Messiah.
    *

    Americans need to recognize that life is not a football game. It's not good enough to just pull for our side, regardless to whether we're talking about the nation, political parties, or individual politicians.  We should always pull for justice, period - regardless to whose political ox it gores.  Because if we continue to allow the various propaganda machines to cloud our minds to the truth, none of us will be safe. It's Muslims who are being demonized today, but tomorrow it may be Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, activists, the entire middle class, or whatever group is convenient to meet our rulers' needs. And yes, I said rulers, because those who control our minds, control our destiny.
    *
    But the propaganda machine is an insidious device, because it tells us what we want to hear, and helps us hide what we don't want to see, so it has the seductive properties of a drug. Take the issue of terrorism for example. Terrorism is defined as the killing of innocent noncombatants for political gain. Keeping that definition in mind, we must not forget that we are the ONLY country on Earth who has ever dropped an atomic bomb on not one, but two cities, killing and maiming hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women, and children. As horrible as 9/11 was, the horror of that atrocity makes 9/11 look insignificant.
    *
    But accepting the fact that we committed such a horrible atrocity is inconsistent with the image that we so passionately embrace of "that shining light on the hill," our propaganda machine swung into action.  It helped us to justify that action by convincing us that we only did it to save the lives of thousands of American troops. But there's a very serious flaw in that argument. By embracng that argument it affirms that we accept the fact that there are times when terrorism is justified. Thus, by our own definition the United States is, in fact, a terrorist state. So the fact is, the only difference between Muslim terrorists and American, or "Christian," terrorists is that we have a much more efficient delivery system.
    *
    Now, before someone gets upset and start shouting that I'm un-American, please remember that truth and justice is the American way - and what I've just told you is both true and just. What I've said here is not simply my opinion. Every word I've written is verifiable, and based on pure logic - and like mathematics, logic doesn't lie.
    *

    Eric L. Wattree
    wattree.blogspot.com
    [email protected]
    *
    Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

    Comments

    We do think about things like 'our side' like it is a goddamn football game.

    That bullshit about w bush landing on an aircraft carrier that was in our waters was taken from Independence Day it never happened of course. I mean George did not just arrive after bombing Bagdad.

    I got stuck listening to rush go on and on about the 2002 elections and how the dems were anti American. The single most anti American in this country is Rush. ha

    US vs them. U.S.

    I have no answers as to how to get the electorate out of that paradigm. No answers whatsovever.

    There are Muslim sects that despise the Vatican. But there are Protestant sects that do the same thing.

    There are a billion Muslims and a billion and a half people who call themselves Christian.

    And among those billions are internal struggles defining what a good Muslim is and what a good Christian is.

    Europe is going ape shit about all this. I don't blame them. It is human nature as they say.

    The point is that there can be no war by the Christians against the Muslims. There are too too many of both.

    So we must find common ground. There is no other way out of all of this.

    Good to see you as always Wattree.


    Thank you, Richard.  It's good to be here.

    There's only one solution to this dilemma - educaton.  The American people must learn to become independent thinkers instead of simply "reactionaries" to what they're being told.   But the powers that be are a step ahead of us in that regard as well, that's why our educational system is currently under such a brutal attack.  The "rulers" have a two-prong method of operation - first, destroy the educational system, then program our untrained minds with subliminal propaganda through the mass media. 

    Palin, Bachmann, and O'Donnell aren't really demagouges - they're just dumb. They're the self-serving victms of a deeply flawed educatonal system. Now the rulers want to take over that system completely through privatizaton and a voucher system. I f they are successful that will complete the circle.  Our educatonal system wll effectively become an academy for young Nazis.  


    Wattree:  Have been watching the caponization of the middle class for three decades.  I find myself one of the millions that has accepted that we've been out-maneuvered  by the corporate/monied class.  The pendulum, hopefully, swings in both directions. 


    Chuck,

    The election of Presdent Obama has caused radical conservatives to go berserk.  As a result the controlling interests have pushed up their agenda to seize total control of ths nation.  Thus, I fear that if the GOP lose in the upcoming election they're gong to spur insurrection, and if they win they're going to make sure that they never lose control again.  I'm convinced we're living in a very pivotal moment in this nation's history, so I'm very serous when I tell you that I'm about to update my passport. 


    Wattree:  Spent much of my professional life working abroad.  Will not get into a diatribe in my response.  Spent some time in Spain under Franco's rule.  My response...Have cleaned my weapons and plan to stay here.  Gonna' die anyway.  May as well make a stand.  I will not submit to where the conservatives are trying to lead me...At any cost! 


    You know, Chuck, you've got a pont.


    I don't agree that there is 'a/n' American propaganda machine.   I am an American and I can't stand that people get killed in our name and the realities of wrongs done in the name of our country.  I just don't agree with painting all of America as falling in line with 'propaganda'  I agree, however, that propaganda exists.

    Yesterday was interesting day.  At one point a cousin asked what she could say to her kids who were disgusted as they tried to understand politics and who they should trust.

    Here is my response:   

    Wow. Greaaaat question. The trick to this is that it's not just about politics. It's about life. We can only do the best we can. Rely on our own instincts, watch what people say and then also what they do to see if those two things are... congruent. I think I trust people no matter what ideals they hold if they live congruent to those ideals. However if their ideals are greed for money and power... it's like they are operating from an empty place I think we can all actually feel and hear if we listen. I think we have to trust ourselves first, try to be congruent ourselves in our words and actions, find out what makes us trustworthy or not. Human beings are never going to be perfect and being trustworthy is part of that. But we can do the best we can. It's not different in politics, it's just that there are fewer people worthy of trust involved right now and we may have a hard job ahead of us to make it easier for trustworthy people to be political leaders but it will be worth the hard work. There is plenty of reason to be disgusted by the mess... but we still need to do our best to clean it up. You've got some smart kids asking questions like this:)
    -----
    Then yesterday Jon Stewart had a guest Sam Harris to discuss his book The Moral Landscape:  How Science Can Determine Human Values.  It was interesting because it was sort of the same thing of looking at what we actually do as opposed to what we say we care about... what do our actions reflect.  I think we can all take an assessment personally from this perspective as to what matters most to us and how we can live our lives accordingly.  
    
    What I know about human beings is that we are connected and the more one of us aligns ourselves with our own real values and priorities... the easier it becomes for someone else to do it and so on and so on.  So it starts with me.

    Synchronicity,

    You are obviously an independent thinker, but as  used to warn my kids when they were growning up - Never assume that everyone else can see what you see.  So wth regard to the propaganda machine, just because it hasn't been successful in brainwashing you, doesn't mean that it doesn't exst.  Even Hitler was less than successful in converting all of Germany into Nazis.  But he did convert enough people to reek havoc throughout the world.


    What I am not assuming or buying is that there is one great 'American Propaganda Machine'.  Of course there is propaganda.  However whose to say where we should make our assumptions?  Maybe there are more who think like me out there than I might imagine?  I am just not going to paint reality according to the assumption that there is such a/one 'machine' unified... I don't believe that... I see many sources of propaganda and with a culture that values various forms of compliance and indoctrination comes a public willing to let people tell them what to think/believe.  It is a complex cultural problem.


    Sync,

    The propaganda machine is called the mass media.  We saw it in action during the invasion of Iraq.  Even thought the invasion was clearly both illegal and immoral, the media had the Amercan people whipped into a frenzy. 


    Even so my response is still the same...  though I would say the media acted as a much more unified propaganda machine in how it handled the Iraq war than most things...


    Before anything else is discussed, one question: what would you say, if you had the opportunity, to Nelson Mandela when he chose to go forward rather than look back?


    Do you mean before or after his terrorist phase...?


    Another,

    In the case of Mandela, that was the choice of the victims. We are the perpetrators.  What right do we have to say that we're going to forgive ourselve for murder?  What if Osama Bin Laden said, "Ok, enough is enough -  let's just let bygones be bygones," do you think the American people would agree to that? I don't think so. 


    Does someone give you candy when you ask questions like this?


    Quinn,

    As I pointed out in the article, what constitutes a terrorism depends on your pont of view.  Great Britain considered our founding fathers terrorsts.


    No.  That's when you dress up in scary costumes and knock on doors threatening to play tricks on people if they don't give you a 'treat'.


    Best description of American Foreign Policy I've read yet. 


    Actually, that's what got the Muslims into trouble.


    I would have told Mandela that he made a very wise decision - but again, in order for justice to prevail, whether or not to move forward should ALWAYS be the prerogative of the victim and never the transgressor.


    I have always felt that there was also smaller propaganda machines in the regions we live and even sometimes in social groups we belong to. 

    It bothered me for weeks after we invaded Iraq all I could think was all the loss of life of people who had not done anything but just be living there. 

    I wonder if Obama felt that going after Bush was going to keep the country from recovering from the recession because spending too much focuse on Bush.   Also that it would cause too many deep wounds in our society.  Another words it would have torn up this country for generations.  We still miss trust government since Nixon   I cried when Bush and Cheney won a second term.  The next morning when I was walking into my local Walmart after the election in 2004, the store greeter looked unhappy.  After a quick hello I made the comment that she looked sad and she said she was.  She knew me well enough to confess that she had cried over the election.  There is many of us that have felt the pain of Bush and Cheney's crimes and know them for what they did.  History will punish them.           


    Trk,

    President Ford made the "tear American apart" argument when he pardoned Nixon, but that's an invalid argument. America is a nation of laws, not men. Government officials have a RESPONSIBILITY to adhere to the rule of law. So it is not a political issue.

    When we create a class of people who are above the law, we begin a descent down a very slippery slope. If Nixon had gone to jail for Watergate, chances are Reagan wouldn't dared to become involved in Iran/Contra, or flood our inner cities with drugs to support that effort.  And if Reagan had been made to join Nixon in prison, certainly Bush and Cheney would never had lied us into the Iraq war.  Thus, a very powerful argument can be mounted that thousands of American troops and close to a millon innocent Iraqi citzens have died simply because we failed to hold Nixon accountable for Watergate over 35 years ago.


    I wonder if Obama felt that going after Bush was going to keep the country from recovering from the recession because spending too much focuse on Bush.   Also that it would cause too many deep wounds in our society.  Another words it would have torn up this country for generations.

    Count me among those who did not want Obama actively pursuing Bush & Cheney, though in my case it's for a different reason.

    The proper place for Bush and Cheney to be tried is The Hague.  Same as Milosevic and other perpetrators of crimes against humanity.

    You may well ask why there rather than in our own justice system.

    I would suggest that a trial in the ICC would do a couple beneficial things that a US trial mgiht not.  First, it would remove any semblance of a political vendetta by moving things (literally) to a neutral court.  Second, by yielding jurisdiction to an international body, the US would be making huge steps forward to solidifying a system of true international law.  Right now, our "national" view is that international law is what we say it is, when we say so, and if we change our mind, then, well, we have always been at war with Eastasia.

    Take it out of the realm of the "victor's court" and into a truly international legal system and we will both likely see them convicted (given the overwhelming evidence) and make great strides toward changing America's status in the eyes of most of the rest of the world.

    And yes, I know it's just as possible that the sun will rise in the west tomorrow and men will begin biting dogs.


    Well Austin,

    Let's just hope the Sun rises in the West tommorow morning - and I'll bite a dog if that's what it will take - because I totally agree wth you.


    Yes!!


    A nation is the same people living in the same place.  -  James Joyce


    Hi LisB. It's good to see you. 

    Joyce was right - and no people, regardless to where they happen to live or what they call themselves, corner the market on morality. 


    Hey Eric:

    I'm glad you found this place.  Here's what I think after a quick read.  I don't think one can assess what the one billion plus Islamic population thinks in the aggregate because it's a extraordinarily diverse group of people.  On the other hand, I think it's fair to say that, all things equal, we haven't made friends in the "muslim" world over the past century.  It's important to keep that in mind.

    On the other hand, I don't really care how 3,000 compares to over one million, except to say that it is entirely unfair and beyond bigotry to condemn every muslilm for that horrific crime.  But then I don't feel comfortable blaming such bigotry and codemnation on some "American propaganda machine," beause among other things it presumes that most people are just plain dumb.  I don't believe that.

    The key, I think, is to look forward, and with respect to 9/11 looking forward means that it is the responsibility of the American government to kill and destroy anyone or any group that may be plotting to bring on 9/11 II, and I mean flatten their asses and make them dead and then some.  Really. But that's just part of looking forward, and by asserting that I'm not saying that we did that in Iraq or are doing that in Afghanistan now.  We have to be smarter and we have to be better. 

     In any event, the other part, the critical long term component is to bridge gaps, and that is no simple task.  That's the hard part, but I don't agree that it begins with ignoring the prospects of future threats to 10, 20, or 100,000 Americans. 

    Bruce

     

     

     


    I agree, Bruce.

    America must defend itself.  But Al Qaeda is a criminal organization and must be handled as such. We're trying to swat a fly with a sledgehammer.  The U.S. military is much too cumbersome to be used to fight what is essentially Middle Eastern Crips, who can fold their tents and move from one location to another overnight.  All we're currently doing is creating more enemies with our indiscriminate mayhem.

    This issue should be addressed by the CIA and law enforcement.  The only reason that the Bush administration defined it as a "war" was to accommodate military contractors like Halliburton, and ravage the United States treasury. 

    They've guaranteed themselves an ongoing meal ticket,  because they know full well that we're creating more enemies than we're killing.  At this rate we'll never be able to kill all the people who hat us.  The key is to use covert operatons to cut the head off the snake.  We've got to make being a leader of a terrorist organization the most dangerous job in the world.

    Just think about how effective Al Qaeda would have been if they had stopped killing innocents and simply went after Bush and Cheney instead.  We all know from Cheney's history that he's a coward, so Al Qaeda would have long since had the Bush administration off their backs - Osama would have probably been a part of NAFTA by now.  So we simply have to reverse that strategy.


    Latest Comments