wws's picture

    Ethics and Anger; Oh, and also, Feminism


    A few years ago I attended the funeral of a venerable Charleston grande dame whom I knew well. I respected her because she was a woman so sure of herself that, despite being a legatee of the old south, she was also, early on, fiercely committed to, among other things: civil rights and, later, the ERA amendment, and later than that, the end of domestic abuse, the war in Iraq, etc.. For those specific reasons, my respect for her was immovable, despite her notorious complacency (and arrogance) that often resulted in comments like the one she made, in an off-hand way, to me: "When you first showed up as an adult, W., we just did not know what to think of the Yankee ways you had picked up, but now.... well, now, we've decided that you are just too amusing to find fault with."  I was piqued by that judgment (even though it was intended to be a stamp of qualified approval in a back-handed way) not only because it was quintessentially Charlestonian in its certainty of divine right to withhold or confer approval, but also because it showed not a shred of recognition that, in fact, I was attempting to follow -- though probably not succeeding in following -- her politically causal footsteps.  

    So it was only later that I felt empathy, as well as respect for her  -- almost fifteen years after her dispensation, to be precise. Because only then could I finally see that though she was a grande dame -- a real presence in the place and the era in which she operated -- she was also like my own more discreet southern mother, in that she had been taught from birth to place a higher value on an ability to make regular contributions of "light and bright" witty repartee than to value her many contributions of substance. 

    And so I sat in church (one of three beautiful churches in Charleston in which local movers and shakers are baptized, married and buried) and listened in disbelief, and sorrow, as one person after another lauded this amazing woman as "a good wife and mother" (trust me; I know her children, and I know that she was not) and "a woman of gentle mien" (trust me; she was truly terrifying) and as "a woman who sacrificed herself to work tirelessly for the community" (No; every stand she took flew in the face of the accepted local order).....blah, blah, blah.  

    As person after person spoke, I wondered why there was such a yawning discrepancy between who she was, and the falsehoods that were being promulgated, insistently, as her personal legacy -- falsehoods which negated her as an individual, in favor of supporting cultural myth that defines, as one-size-fits-all, what a good woman does and says.

    The answer, I think, has little to do with the South -- although the pressure for women to conform to stereotype may be particularly intense there, even now. But I think it really has more to do, maybe even everything to do with die-hard opinions about women -- opinions that are no less corrupting, and damaging to the cohesiveness of our future, than are mythic paeans to "a free market economy" and "less governmental regulation."

    Our world does not need women to devote their energies to being the consummate "Angel in the House" as Virginia Woolf so passionately, if savagely, depicted. Our world needs women who speak their minds and hearts --- even if, from time to time, their tone is piss angry about something. Our world will be better off when more men, as well as retro-minded women, are willing to hear us -- because we know something, a thing or two, about what matters, whether for ourselves, or for the generations to come.    

     

    Comments

    I've never believed in the whole "never speak ill of the dead" schtick, not even at funerals. Why not say the person was a complete bastard in relation to XYZ, but GREAT at ABC. Or even suggest some of the complexity of people & their lives.

    Anyway. All that to the side, bottomline... GIVE 'EM HELL, WW!


    I realize this is a 'reverse' homage. But this sentence struck me:

    "When you first showed up as an adult, we just did not know what to think of the Yankee ways you had picked up, but now.... well, now, we've decided that you are just too amusing to find fault with."

    It reminds me of Alice Roosevelt: "If you do not have anything good to say about anybody, come and sit next to me."

    It is not meaning of what was said, it is how it was said. This is what I feel, this is what I am,take it or leave it.

    It is that sense. I have met people like that. Men and women.

    I guess that sometimes we lie about the dead to make ourselves feel better.


    I think the world needs women who are free to be themselves. If that means rebels. If that means giving and being a rebel through compassion. And so on. But who can be themselves without being criticized for their assertiveness or their compassion. If we get there, then I will heave a sigh of relief!

    Lovely blog! It's really refreshing to have this "personal" view of the south.


    Regardless of the cultural bias toward speaking well of women in life or death, I think there is a cultural bias toward revering those who've passed on in general. I don't think it's necessarily a healthy bias either, often serving to extend grief. I attended a wake in which willing participants addressed the gathering and took turns telling the worst story they could remember about the departed. That served a great purpose, in providing levity as we all considered what an ass our friend was in spite of overwhelming admirable traits. It also allowed us to put his life in more meaningful perspective, rather than just sitting around crying, and telling each other how the world won't be the same without him, (which it won't).


    I don't think I have much to add, but I did recommend this post.

    Nicely told - thanks.

    Wordplay over substance - hmmmm...


    Thank you so much, M2. You remind me of what was, for me, a pivotal moment at my grandfather's funeral, when an old guy doddering on a cane hobbled up to my grandfather's coffin, looked at him, and said, with simple satisfaction: "Been waitin' thirty years for this;" and, without introducing himself, or bothering to expound, hobbled away.
    I adored my grandfather, who adored me. But that doesn't mean that he did not hurt other people. I wish I had broken out of social convention, and followed the old guy out to the lobby, to ask what it was all about. I was loved and, so, I had nothing to lose. But I might, maybe, have healed something that needed to be healed, just by listening.


    Now you are making me nervous, OG. What do you have in mind? Am I guilty of same? If so, tell me so. I respect you, and your opinion.


    You are something approaching spectacular, ma'am.


    Well this old grouch could read you all the time.

    You are one of the best writers I have come across on the web or in a newspaper or magazine for that matter.


    DD: Southern women, as I have told you, do not perspire, but only glow. You make me glow. However, as someone recently pointed out, squid blush. This is completely disconcerting to me, as a lover of Calamari, because I: a) cannot, any longer, order same; and, b) now, thanks to you, have to learn to deal with blushing, as well as with glowing.


    You make you make me giggle. I have not giggled for a long time!!!!!

    My drunken old man would say

    Horses sweat
    Men perspire
    And women glow

    hahahahahahahahaa


    Not at all, Bwak, and I mean this: it is you who rawk. (Btw, to show proper respect to you, when I posted a Newfie dog video for Quinn as his belated birthday gift, I purposely passed up the one in which the Newfie had a chicken toy. It seemed unseemly, given your integrity; verdad? -- is verdad right?)


    No, commenting on your mention of it. That's all.

    Mmmmm...calamari...


    Si, es verdad.


    See I was going to speak up for Grouch. What an idiot I am. He would not hurt a fly and certainly no the Belle of the Stables!!!!hahahahahhaha

    I love calmari. I forgot about that.


    I know the arrogance you are talking about. I have seen it in action and felt the short end of it too.
    In regards to the ethical dilemma of praise and/or blame, I do know there was a price to be paid to espouse what this woman did. She paid for it probably in more ways than anyone will ever know.
    Paying respect to imagined virtue is not necessarily false because you have to imagine it.
    Love requires imagination.


    You know I really do not think you will get this.

    But I know who you remind of now. It is the old National Lampoon. It is Doug Kenny and the guy who ended up on SNL. And even Greenberg sp.

    But you have beliefs. You have a soul.

    Not to bother you but I was thinking about that today.


    ACK! Sorrrrrrrrry.

    But, I blame the Monterey aquarium.

    =D


    Moat: You are absolutely right that she paid a price, and that price was undoubtedly higher than I, or anyone else, knew. Because what I know about was bad enough -- a husband who strayed; children who did, in fact, have a right to feel overlooked in favor of her causes, but who, nonetheless, were merciless to her, just the same.
    But when you say: "Paying respect to imagined virtue is not necessarily false because you have to imagine it" I'm afraid that I am not entirely clear about the insightful point you are making. What do you mean?



    Doesn't "calamari" involve hurting the squid?

    Otherwise, I only hurt trolls. They don't count.


    Hello, my friend. I truly hope that whatever trials you are facing that brought these thoughts to mind are soon no more. The portrait you paint is one that has hung on many walls, unappreciated and overlooked. How to explain those who required no explanation for their lives? How to make their life make sense when they never cared for it to do so except on their own terms? How, in retrospect, can you argue with that?

    When my day of reckoning comes, I hope that I can say I told the truth. That I was strong enough to be right, and tough enough to be wrong. And that at least one person far more worthy than I loved me.


    Hey, M --
    I revised this this morning because it did not make the point I wanted it to make. But you got it anyway, and said it much better, in fewer words.
    Here's to the "well-behaved" women who hang on the walls who live in the house that custom built.
    Thank you.


    I have been to similar memorials, and often it is the family who censors and edits what will be said. They, or even sometimes friends, choose to edit out what may be perceived as "questionable," or "socially unacceptable." Hence the "speaking ill of the dead."

    If it is perceived that the person's political activism, outspoken ways, or some component of who they are, was "inappropriate," then lauding that is speaking ill of the dead. Unfortunately, it is often the presumed "flaws" that actually demonstrate the beauty, power, and distinctiveness of the person.

    I truly hope that when I die that people don't clean up my "resume."


    ... she was a woman so sure of herself that, despite being a legatee of the old south, she was also, early on, fearlessly committed to, among other things: civil rights and, later, the ERA amendment, and later ...

    ..."a woman who sacrificed herself to work tirelessly for the community" (No; every stand she took flew in the face of the accepted local order)

    I loved this piece, thank you. I'd would just like to humbly offer a different take on your point quoted above.

    Perhaps, with time, the community caught up a bit towards where your grand dame had been making her brave stand all along.

    And perhaps this was due to her tirelessness, her fearlessness, and her sacrifice.

    One can hope, right?


    Thank you for that positive thought, Panning, which does give us all hope.


    I am not a good woman. Saying it like that gives it multiple interprations. I like all those ambiguities. ;)

    Interesting post, ww.


    Now, E: "Interesting post? " That is a classic "good woman" polite response, even though delivered by one who self-proclaims herself to be "not a good woman" with appropriate layers of ambiguities.
    So what do you really think?


    What I meant by that admittedly obscure remark was that eulogizing can't help but generate fictions, and a lot of fictions can be awfully self-serving in a way that preserves social order in the way your post talks about.
    Now being raised by my mother to be a gentlemen involved a lot of emphasis on putting myself in other people's shoes. Even if they were reserved, arrogant, etc.
    So maybe all fiction is not self-serving, especially if it is an attempt to approach a truth.
    Full disclosure: My mother grew up in Mississippi.


    Thanks for the clarification, Moat. When you say: "My mother grew up in Mississippi..." I feel your pain, as well as your pride. They were something, those southern women; even when they moved elsewhere, they were raising their children to be southern to the core, as they were raised by their mothers, etc..


    Latest Comments