Orion's picture

    The Mind Of Prejudice

    A little note - Dagblog has a code, Terms Of Service, that we all are obligated to follow as long as we are here. I realize I've passed those bounds myself and so have others. This is a very heated issue and it is wise for all of us to try to watch ourselves.

    If you guys have the time, read this entire essay. It was sent to me by a friend from Florida and is written by a gentleman who obviously did not enjoy his experience working at a predominantly black school. If you can make it through, reading stuff like this is very important as it taps in to the mindset of many in our society:

    There was a lot of drug-dealing at my school. This was a good way to make a fair amount of money but it also gave boys power over girls who wanted drugs. An addicted girl -- black or white -- became the plaything of anyone who could get her drugs.

    One of my students was a notorious drug dealer. Everyone knew it. He was 19 years old and in eleventh grade. Once he got a score of three out of 100 on a test. He had been locked up four times since he was 13.

    One day, I asked him, "Why do you come to school?"

    He wouldn't answer. He just looked out the window, smiled, and sucked air through his teeth. His friend Yidarius ventured an explanation: "He get dat green and get dem females."

    "What is the green?" I asked. "Money or dope?" "Both," said Yidarius with a smile.

    A very fat black interrupted from across the room: "We get dat lunch," Mr. Jackson. "We gotta get dat lunch and brickfuss." He means the free breakfast and lunch poor students get every day. "Nigga, we know'd you be lovin' brickfuss!" shouts another student.

    Some readers may believe that I have drawn a cruel caricature of black students. After all, according to official figures some 85 percent of them graduate. It would be instructive to know how many of those scraped by with barely a C- record. They go from grade to grade and they finally get their diplomas because there is so much pressure on teachers to push them through. It saves money to move them along, the school looks good, and the teachers look good.

    Many of these children should have been failed, but the system would crack under their weight if they were all held back.

    How did my experiences make me feel about blacks? Ultimately, I lost sympathy for them. In so many ways they seem to make their own beds. There they were in an integrationist's fantasy--in the same classroom with white students, eating the same lunch, using the same bathrooms, listening to the same teachers--and yet the blacks fail while the whites passed.

    It's sad and sick that not only a person would feel the need to write this and that he would be cowardly enough to write it anonymously but it does help reinforce much of what drives racism in this country.

    This man obviously did not seek out  a job at a mostly black junior high or high school. It was an unfortunate series of events in his personal and professional life that led to him ending up there. He falls in with a whole bunch of stereotypes - that black people as a whole are susceptible to drugs, sex, ignorance and violence that the pale species simply never have and never will.

    His own self loathing therefore gets subjected on people who have nothing to do with it - people who behave the way that people in poverty usually do.

    You see, white people have never sold or used drugs, have never not known about certain things and therefore been ignorant, they've never had sex or gotten pregnant before the socially acceptable age. Black folks, on the other hand, have never done things like invent traffic lights, peanut butter, jazz, blues, rock and roll and hip-hop or been elected President of the United States. This world would just be such a better place without their obesity, kinky hair and welfare status.

    It's not good people who think this way - it is people who have become losers and are unwilling to pull themselves up from hate.

    I have a sister like this. Hell, I have a bunch of family like this. My sister would talk about her living in Los Angeles and later Texas like some sort of dystopian nightmare - in which she was constantly having to escape from Hispanic illegal immigrants who hopped the border just so that they could rape her. Her quest for survival, according to last time I had this misfortune to be around her, apparently started even in Seattle - as she could not stop rambling about bussing and not getting in to the school she wanted to be in because she was "too white." She has been on about that shit for damn near twenty years - every time I've had the misfortune of being around her has been like a KKK rally.

    This writer wanted to look at things from a tribal perspective - not once does he look into the minds (and they do have minds, believe it or not, asshole) of the students he taught. It all has the tone of an Anthropological Study of the Savages of the African Diaspora. My sister, the last time I saw her, defended herself when I got really pissed off by her saying racist stuff by saying she thought I'd relate since  I had been bullied myself at a predominantly black school as a kid. That was true but unlike her, that experience led to me becoming immersed in the culture and trying to understand it (and getting to the point where I work in the world of hip-hop).

    This writer, like her, seemed to have stepped foot in this predominantly black school with the presumption that these people were "others" - he never makes the connection that the reason they may have been so rude to him could have to do with his attitude to begin with.

    This is the reality, however, despite the election of Barack Obama. The tone of this essay is indicative of alot of people in this country, especially where he is from. I have been out east on several occasions in my life - black folks in the South are about as close to India's "untouchables" as you will get in the West. Many Southerners pride themselves on their lack of miscegenation and the free association of many skin colors that you get everywhere else is still pretty absent. (So much for all that "freedom" talk, right?)

    It's not really worth arguing with but it is important to be aware of. There is truth when this essayist says that most white people try to dance around racial issues - if they didn't, conservatism wouldn't sell to a country that is built on diversity. 

    Alot of conservative thought sounds a whole lot different once you take serious racial prejudice in to account - when applied to the real world, what these folks want to see implemented at best would be a cessation of funding towards non-white schools, at worst genocide. You hear, in much more hushed tones, this same sort of talk on the radio programs of conservatives like Dennis Prager - the presence of black guests and talk of "soft bigotry" a mask for flat bigotry.

    These people aren't thinking and it's really important to remember that.

    Comments

    This is typical lower Alabama crazy right world.  They know how bad their education system is because the power structure refuses to spend much money on it.  So instead they blame the kids for the poor results.  They just can't seem to face reality and try to live in a made up world.


    Sounds about right. The right wing of the political spectrum appeals alot to people who live in fantasy worlds - I know that from experience. Based on what you said, I would pay stuff like this no mind but based on right wing behavior during the Obama years and my own sister, who grew up in a very liberal environment, this sort of nonsense can appeal strongly to people who definitely know better.


    The deep South's problems with this lies in the what is called the Lost Cause Syndrome. The term comes from a book written in 1866 that has Lost Cause in it's title.  The author was Pollard, who was a journalist for a Richmond VA paper.  He wrote his view of what happened and why they lost.  Only it was because of all the aggression from the north.  People just suffered and lost so much that they had a hard time coming to terms with the mistake their states made. Then more books and history was written to make a hero out of the southern culture at a attempt to rewrite what really happened. The rest of the country it is just ignorance and media from the right feeds into racism.


    I think most people, at least after Civil Rights, of both the Left and Right didn't give those guys a second nod. Now, thanks to Ron Paul and his son, all that nonsense seems to be back - even if it's in stealth. Unfortunately, alot of people in libertarian fantasy world, which I definitely was in for a while, are buying in to it - thinking that they've discovered something no one else knows.


    No time to step into all this bullshit, but first:

    - many marginalized minorities often speak loud, funny, have unacceptable behavior... it's because they're minorities - they act different, whether blacks, gypsies, Mexicans or Salvadorans, Arabs, Indians, Vietnamese & Lao, etc. Try hanging out in Calcutta for a day and see if your head doesn't hurt - unless you're Bengali.

    - not the south again, please? The Lost Cause? Jesus Mother Mary, do you think whites are still sitting around playing little black sambo and re-enacting Pickett's Charge? Have you heard of any lynchings lately? Because there ain't been none. People are doing other shit. I had a nice talk with an Indian woman in Birmingham, worked as a nurse, might like to move back but was comfortable and her kids were too American at this point. Just 1 of hundreds of unremarkable conversations. It's not Escape from Manhattan set in a southern clime. Yeah, a lot of poor uneducated people say stupid shit and act uncontrolled. Last time I looked at a foreign public primary school, the situation was pretty much the same.

    - money in education - well, Mission High San Francisco has lost money because they don't focus on standardized tests - they think students thinking about what they write a lot is more important than multiple choice in math & English - graduation and college progression points this out even with a highly immigrant non-native English student body. And Bob Somerby keeps pointing out that even black test scores continue to rise impressively over the last 10 / 15 years - but everyone including liberals continue to ignore it.

    So really, just becaue someone had a bad time at a black school and wrote something reactive doesn't mean we need another blog post attacking the south, US education, whatever without actually saying something new and thoughtful?

    Rebel yell, y'all - need to go get some fried catfish & hush puppies now.


    So really, just because someone read a disturbing comment and wrote something reactive doesn't mean we need another long comment attacking the writer, sanctimonious Yankees, whatever without actually saying something new and thoughtful?

    Everyone knows that racism is over, so why do we have to read about it anymore? Enjoy the hush puppies.


    What Mike said. Look - by no means does this represent the majority of Southerners but I'm not taking old ghosts and projecting him here. This article was written in Dec. 2012 according to the source who sent it to me. It's been republished at all sorts of white supremacist websites like Stormfront. Despite what I may have said to his detrement, the writer is fairly articulate.

    Racism isn't "over." In Germany, people are constantly worried about neo-Nazis appealing to people who are disaffected for whatever reason. I don't think they think the Nazis will be the ruling part anymore but there is always the possibility that people who feel alienated will want to blame it on Jews, blacks, Gypsies, Muslims and other minorities.

    There is still at least a sizeable portion of the American population that nods their head at what was written in this article. That's just reality. People like this guy:

    If Mr. Butler had used a rope instead of a gun and had a couple other people help him out, it would have been a lynch mob. So congratulations on the southern progress, it seems racism has just been microsized!

    I could come up with material on this subject endlessly and power a post at least five times a day because this country, where racism apparently doesn't exist anymore, produces alot of racist material. I'm sorry if that reality doesn't mesh with your reality, Peracles. Maybe your reality isn't reality?


    If Mr. Butler had grown tits and painted his lips, he might have been a walk-on in a carney. I can play what-if games all day.

    Back in the day, the KKK had guns - they lynched people to send a message, to terrorize. They did it in groups to intimidate. It's not the same as 1 racist bastard with a gun.

    Your response fits with my thoughts about Michael's comment above - first comment on this thread was about typical lower Alabama racism [the author said he'd taught in a "Southeast US state" but since this re-print was on a Mobile blog, guess it had to be assumed Alabama. assuming that - Mobile? is that really the poster child for southern racism? Think not]

    The article quoted is pretty stupid, the author plainly would have trouble around anyone different than himself, wants to teach his college thesis to poor uninterested students. Could have made him watch "Blackboard Jungle" from 1955 or the reversed To Sir, With Love and saved him a lot of time. Is it even a real person, or just some penned letter to scare about black teen pregnancy and black-white dating, rail against school lunch programs...?

    Is this a new article from 2012? No, it's at least as old as 2009 tied to Marty Nemko & Christopher Jackson, though I found it pasted in comments from 2008, but I guess we can always dig it up for a new round. Hey, I just found this new doc at a rightwing site, "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" - let's discuss!

    Is it surprising that Tea Partiers would rally around such a dumb article - no, not really.

    Could there ever be a thought to how to improve the lot of the poorest parts of Alabama (including the "Black Belt") rather than another facile equation of "oh, bunch of racists" or "oh, dump money into education"? My note about Mission High SF is that our education "cures" of the last 2 decades don't cure or encourage to think - they try to indoctrinate and even there don't do well.

    Without some jobs to mix with education, all you do is get a few people to move away while the rest stagnate. And our testing-focused "education" may not prepare people to create jobs or give them the skills to go from 12th grade to some needed trade - IT or assembly or medical - so there's no pool of workers for a non-local company to come in and develop.

    Point being, liberal outrage & conservative outrage amount to about the same thing. I didn't say racism is "over". But the discussions are frequently as unilluminating as 10 or 20 years ago, sometimes even more retro. Wow, racism still exists in south, who woulda thunk it?

    Any idea how many people moved from Rust Belt to SunBelt since the 1970's, how many new Hispanic & Indian & other immigrants during that time (has been enough to cause a stir in Georgia), what the changes in technology (Atlanta?) and manufacturing mean for the region, how the high-tech regions in North Carolina affect things? What is changing, or do transplants merge into southern racist values?

    Here's Obama's white vote by state in 2008 - note North Carolina, Florida, Virginia, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee as all over 30%.

    SOUTH
    30.2
     
    Alabama
    10
    McCain
    Arkansas
    30
    McCain
    Florida
    42
    Obama
    Georgia
    23
    McCain
    Kentucky
    36
    McCain
    Louisiana
    14
    McCain
    Mississippi
    11
    McCain
    North Carolina
    35
    Obama
    Oklahoma
    29
    McCain
    South Carolina
    26
    McCain
    Tennessee
    34
    McCain
    Texas
    26
    McCain
    Virginia
    39
    Obama

    Obama improved from 10% to 15% of Alabama's white vote in 2012 despite Romney being a less decrepit candidate and the joblessness & wars & health care around Obama's neck - Obama did a bit worse in much of the South. What moved Alabama's vote? Is it something repeatable elsewhere?

    While I scoffed at money in education, as of last September 35 states had lower spending than in 2008 - Alabama's dropping $1318 per student since 2008. Living in poverty and ignorance does nothing good for moving away from racism - what is the economic status since 2008, and how does it affect all these Tea Party & intolerance issues?

    Here's a Birmingham mayor trying to defend schools despite the cuts - see, you stay on the "failed school list" if you're in the lowest 6%, even if you're improving. Here you can see some improvement in lower assualts and "met or exceeded standards for grade 10". A lot of the other measures are opaque to me, though I notice a high drugs & weapons problem. Anecdotes about a southern school are less interesting than the overall progress or decline, even though anecdotes can sometimes be useful in illustrating an issue (can sometimes be misleading as well)

    Enough from me.


    This comment has been deleted.

    Shorter version, I can talk about the South, but you can't talk about the South.


    This comment has been deleted.

    Please explain where I have "serious racism prejudice", thank you.

    What racism did I defend?


    Orion, you said I had a "serious racism prejudice".

    Why don't you tell me what you think that is, or simply retract it?

    Tell me where I use racial slurs in "in just the same manner". In fact show me a single fucking racial slur.

    (Tip for you: look at my comment just below where I talked about how well black students are doing, despite usual media libel to the contrary)

    Clock's ticking.


    This comment has been deleted.

    [ToS Warning]


    Shorter: never "went in to the same realm of alternative reality that DiCaprio's character did", never defended South African or US or Southern racism, or downplayed historical suffering of slavery or civil rights-era racism. Tried to discuss issues of Republican astroturfing/sock-puppetry and realistic evaluation of current situation - where better/worse/same including educational progress, budget issues, jobs prognosis, racial acceptance & social meshing (instead of just a mediocre "tolerance"), and Republican opportunism in the wake of rescinding the Voting Rights Act.

    Hope that's clear enough.

    PS - a little hope that kids are fixing the situation piece by piece


    Orion, I'm not entirely sure what you're implying, but I want to make to clear that we don't permit accusations of racism. If you feel that someone is violating the terms of service, you are welcome to bring your concerns to one of the moderators.

    And though I've directed this comment to Orion, let me add that there have been a number personal attacks in this thread (and a few others) from all sides. These attacks include accusations of blogging inappropriately. If they continue, we'll start issuing more suspensions and shutting more down threads.

    To reiterate what I've written many times, the reason we don't permit personal attacks is not because we're trying to protect people's feelings or stifle any ideas but because the escalation of tit-for-tat accusations can quickly poison a blog, as those of you who came from TPM should remember--as if this thread weren't evidence enough.

    Finally, let me add a personal request. Over the past few weeks, I've lost a lot time moderating. In my personal life, I'm overwhelmed with obligations and behind my deadline. Sorting out personal disputes at dagblog is the last thing I need to be spending my time on. So please, stick to the issues. If you see someone else veering from the issues, ignore it and stick to the issues.

    Thank you very much for your cooperation.


    Point taken, Mike. I removed my comment along with several others. It is very easy for me to lose my ball bearings on this issue, something that I am well aware of.


    It's certainly written with stereotypes in mind, i.e. "how many people think".

    It's 5 years old (notice the reference to Clinton, + can google key phrases)

    Despite talk of "drugs" there's no mention of what drugs - or whether smoked, snorted, popped or injected - but they were "addicted", black or white.

    The "drug dealer" had been locked up 4 times, but the teacher has to say "everyone knew it"? what was his rap sheet? how was he back in school? all sounds like someone wrote it without being there.

    Black kids do poorly - he guesses they drag out a C-, but can't give examples from his classes? He really thought he'd teach Tyrtaeus to one of these kids? (whoever the hell that is). What a moron.

    And it really doesn't address much. There are poor people in Alabama, education is low in rural areas, black out-of-wedlock pregnancy is high, and BTW, kids in public schools aren't as well-mannered as in Harvard or your typical prep school, and hey - black kids have accents. Who knew?

    I'd guess it was written by James O'Keefe or one of his acolytes. He even touched on the welfare queen and Zimbabwe farmers and black-girls-have-fat-butts.

    But if you actually care about black education, here Bob Somerby notes a recent test showing black 17-year-olds being 2 years ahead of their 1970's peers. And that both black & Hispanics are making even better progress at 9 & 13-year-old level. And despite the Atlanta cheating scandal, in the 2011 tests blacks were doing well there too - though Somerby notes that Atlanta black students may be more affluent than Lower Alabama students - might have those advantages of say middle-class upbringing. In another article, Somerby notes that black Massachusetts youngsters outscored their Finnish peers - usually considered the gold standard of comparison (coming from a highly wealthy and homogenous non-immigrant culture)

    But according to this anonymous clown Jackson, you just can't use those white education tricks on black kids - they just refuse to learn.

    And here, the reaction is to shoot down Jackson as being racist, along with the whole south: "black folks in the South are about as close to India's "untouchables" as you will get in the West. Many Southerners pride themselves on their lack of miscegenation and the free association of many skin colors that you get everywhere else is still pretty absent."

    Atlanta with a string of black mayors is ruling over a land of "untouchables" - with a rising number of interracial marriages, with 79% in the south now approving of interracial marriage- and 97% of all 18-29-year-olds,  we're still in 1839!!!

    Here's a NY Times article about growing interracial populations in the South. But I guess nothing's changed if blacks are untouchables.


    Uh, the next time you complain about someone going off topic, come back and read what you posted here.


    The post was about racist teachers in the south (likely a GOP sock puppet), the South being the "land of untouchables", and the need for money in education, among other items such as it being an old recycled article. I rather addressed all of these. (I looked at the referenced URL as well)

    Please let me know which topic I discussed didn't belong. I'll consider removing it.

    Note - "thorough" doesn't mean "irrelevant". I didn't launch into my favorite themes of national black unemployment or the Afghanistan War or government surveillance for example, and left out any analogies to George Zimmerman for you to feed on.


    As long as it makes sense to you.


    The South may have changed, but it has not changed enough. If you looked at the map of states that fell under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, you basically have at map of the Confederacy. Likewise if you look at areas that got bailed into review by violating Section 3 of the VRA, you are looking in the South. Section 3 requires discovery of intentional discrimination to suppress votes.


    Think debating the VRA here is largely off-topic. Start a thread & I'll comment.


    You are hilarious. 


    That too is off-topic. But I was serious.


    I know you were that is what's hilarious look at the initial response to your post


    The gutting of the Voting Rights Act is a demonstration of how racism has changed. In the 2.0 version we merely pretend that racism no longer exists. In the case of VRA, we say that there is no discrimination in voting patterns. The Justices were fully aware of what they were doing.


    The author of this essay worked in one black school and now assumes he knows what all of the tens of thousands of black schools and all black children are like. This is the very definition of prejudice. There's no effort at all to see if his school is unique when just five minutes of searching youtube will get you dozens of videos of bright articulate well behaved black children in wonderful classrooms.

    Such a colossal error and evidence of prejudice calls into question every word he's posted about his experience in that one school. He has discredited himself and therefore everything in his story of his school is questionable to say the least.

    I suppose there's some small value in reading this essay as a way of understanding the mind of a racist. Just as reading Mein Kampf might give one some insight into the mind of Hitler or reading the Elders of Zion might give one insight into the mind set of  the Klu Klux Klan. Other than that I can't see wasting time with his essay.


    We can laugh at the bigoted schoolteacher who expected and expects Black students to do poorly. The post suggests that the sentiment expressed is not uncommon. Abigail Fisher was rejected by UT-Austin. There were a variety of reasons that Fisher could have been rejected. The rejection had to be due to UT-Austin accepting inferior Black students. She stated this in a televised interview her lawyers made sure that Fisher became an example of racial victimization. Fisher could not believe that she was not qualified. The teacher and Fisher both presume superiority of Blacks. Fisher got support from a Conservative willing to fund her lawsuit.

    Just  as Conservatives have people who are willing to challenge climate science and ignore scientific findings, but allowing Conservative to quote papers or articles to support their opposition to change. For example Rasmussen, one of the the worst performing poll in the recent Presidential election according to Nate Silver, put out a report suggesting that Blacks are more racist than Whites. The study is flawed, but for the target audience, facts don't matter. The red meat has been given to the bigots. Rasmussen's work has been done.

    The schoolteacher is one of many waiting to be fed.


    The schoolteacher is likely fictitious, a James O'Keefe pimp invention.

    Reading Goethe peacefully to the white students while the black hordes wait outside.

    It's sock puppetry, just hasn't made it to Snopes yet.


    You may be correct about the teacher.Abigail Fisher and the Rasmussen poll are real

    The Supreme Court in gutting the Voting Rights Act ruled that racism was no longer a problem as far as voting was concerned ignoring a recent Congressional review that revealed ongoing problems. The actions in North Carolina and Texas in moving to enact laws that are discriminatory against minorities are real. The Supreme Court allowed the discriminatory laws to be given a green light by denying the racism that sill exists in the voting system  Colbert did a great takedown of the decision

    There had to be public outcry for charges to be brought against George Zimmerman in the murder of an unarmed teen, Trayvon Martin. Sanford, Florida, the city where the murder occurred has its own sad history of racial bias. One pundit blamed the death on Martin.Martin wore a hoodie. The pundit later apologized

    The mayor of NYC defends his "Stop and Frisk" policy by saying too few Blacks have been stopped by the program. At least his term is ending. 

    In Racism 2.0 the argument is that racism doesn't exist, a hoodie is a threat, and Blacks should feel safer by being submitted to pat downs. The post noted the essay and the writer's experience with people who displayed the same sentiment noted in the essay, Overt racism can be confronted. Covert racism is much harder to combat.


    None of these are issues Orion discussed in his diary.

    Wrong thread.


    Let me set things straight. You are taking a privilege that I do not grant.You do not tell me what or what not to post. You have no authority over my posting.If you don't like I post, ignore it.Do not dare tell me what I can post.

    I noted that the person who created the post found your initial post all over the map and thought that you were lost. Thanks again for providing humor to start my day. Your request is denied. I will post as I wish. You are free to ignore or refrain from commenting.You should deal with your own off topic post, rather than giving me posting instructions. 

    Now that I think of it ,I'll show your initial post, the response it got and then your use of some presumed privilege to tell me what I can post.You are a laugh riot.


    Tell you what you stop telling me what to post and I won't ask the administrators  to review your decision to decide become a self-appointed moderator. You should look at the response to your post before advising others.


    Why don't you just look at the topics discussed and discuss them?

    You wrote your own post the other day - it was a fine place to discuss those other issues.

    I personally get tired of every time I make a comment no matter what, your response turns into a discussion of Zimmerman or voting rights or Congress won't do its job.

    So it's not even just a problem for the person who wrote the diary - I end us discussing stupid rehash shit with you no matter what I said originally. Look at this comment thread above - can't you see how you just went off on a tangent from my sock puppet comment? In what bizarro-land do you think that's okay behavior?

    I welcomed you to tell me where my responses above deviated from Orion's original posted topics (or his 1st comment) and I would delete the irrelevant part. Accusing and being fact are 2 different things.


    You need to review the response your post received. Clean your own house. The post deals with racism In all it's manifestations.If you don't like it, ignore the post.when someone says something about the South we know that you will come in with some off the wall comment. If I am predictable so are you. I'll continue to post what I choose.Make life easy on yourself and ignore the post.

    Stop avoiding the response your all over the map post received from the person who created the post. You cannot divert attention from that critique as much as want to try.

    I'm going to make post about the Texas ID law.Close your eyes.


    Texas has decided to enact voter ID laws. Because the state has a history of discrimination, the law may be illegal under Section 3 of the voting Rights Act. Discrimination is how a prejudiced mind gets to enforce a bias. It is the heart of racism


    There is a mindset of superiority in some quarters Attempts to dance around it cause you to trip. Take for example, the close Congressional aide to Senator Rand Paul, Jack Hunter. Hunter co- wrote  ex Senator Jim DeMint's book "The Tea Party Goes To Washington". Hunter was the chairman of the Charleston, S.C. branch of a pro-secessionist group, the League of the South, prior to becoming a Paul staffer. The group is described as implicitly racism by the Anti-Defamation League. He wrote that Lincoln's assassins' "Heart was in the right place." He openly expressed his secessionist views as recently as 2009.

    The prejudiced mindset is alive and well and even reaches into the floors of the Senate

    (Edited:  corrected book author to Jim Demint. Originally credited Rand Paul)


    Latest Comments