MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
We have heard a lot over the last four years on how those responsible for the economic/financial crisis of 2008-2009 have gotten away scot-free. That the policies of Bush have been not only replicated by Obama, but enhanced and refined.
How the same people in charge of the economy under Bush were kept on and that nothing has been done to prevent a repeat of these events. The right claiming too much regulation and calling the administration fascist or socialist or what not and the left accusing it of similar political evil. All of whom are in my opinion missing the boat.
The events of the last couple of decades suggest another explanation to what is going on. Some say since the Reagan administration and some say even Nixon.
Like a person with an incurable decease, when an empire begins to fall apart, it becomes desperate and is willing to try anything to forestall the inevitable. Rules and morals and ethics that were once sacrosanct, begin to be discarded and like Matt Taibbi and Ives Smith say, it begins to look and behave like an organized crime family.
BILL MOYERS: You're describing a corrupt financial and political system. And both of you in recent writings, your current article in "Rolling Stone," which is devastating on the scam that the "Wall Street learned from the Mafia," and a recent column you wrote about the mafia state, you're both using that metaphor to apply to our financial and political system. When I read your pieces, you're not playing with words there. You mean it.
YVES SMITH: Yeah.
BILL MOYERS: Why do you mean it?
YVES SMITH: Well, the mafia, when it gets to be big enough, first thing it has services that people feel they need if they're in a difficult situation. So, for example, loan sharking. If you really need money, they do have the money. And people enter into these loan shark deals even though they know it's going to be very difficult to pay 20 percent or more interest and they'll have their legs broken if they don't pay back.
And the banks actually behave very much in that manner when they find people who really need money. So you see this with credit cards, you know, that, or, and with mortgages. That if you hit-- it's not this if you hit any tripwire, that, you know, become in arrears, the banks basically act in this very extortionate manner and don't cut any breaks.
MATT TAIBBI: And I think that there's also this, they are the mafia because of their vast criminality in Wall Street now is that it's bribery, theft, fraud, bid rigging, price fixing, gambling, loan sharking. All of these things, it's all organized.
I mean, the story I just wrote about, which was about the systematic rigging of municipal bond auctions, which affected every community in every state in the country and all of the major banks were involved, including Chase.
They were rigging the auctions that were designed to create a fair rate of return on the investments that towns were getting on their-- the money they borrowed for municipal bonds. And this is not like something that the mafia does. This is what the mafia does. The mafia has historically, it's one of their staple businesses, is bid rigging for construction or garbage or, you know, street cleaning services, whatever it is.
They're doing exactly the same thing. The only thing that's different is there's no violence involved. But what their method of control is that they're ubiquitous. They have this incredible political power that the mafia never had.
YVES SMITH: And they also have what amounts to an oligopoly. I mean, for many of these services, you have a great deal of difficulty going beyond the five biggest banks, you know? This is-- it's the consequence of too big to fail is that when, you know, some of the smaller players, again, you know, like-- JPMorgan buying Bear Stearns.
In the crisis, when the smaller players got sick, they were merged into the bigger players. So now if you want-- for a lot of these services, there aren't that many players for you to go to. You really have no choice in-- other than to deal with the big banks.
Those with the most to lose begin stop playing by the old rules and begin to make up new ones to fit their current situation as Dmitry Orlov suggests in his Reinventing Collapse. What he did not expect, I think is that the government itself would fail to follow it's own rules and would - along with the corporate and financial sector - evolve into what is in a sense a criminal organization. Using national security as the primary pretext to ignoring or completely eliminating any law that proved to be in the way. Or the way this country "removes" bosses of other countries that prove to be "bad for business".
It wasn't long after the bank and corporate bail outs that article upon article began to appear in The Washington Post, The New York Times and even That Wall Street Journal stating or questioning whether capitalism was dead. Some very harshly indeed.
Now nearly all of those voices are resolutely silent on the subject and those that still speak out tip toe around it. Even as more and more evidence surfaces of the complicity of government in the criminal behavior of the financial and business sector.
After the fall of The Soviet Union, Russia and a number of its former states plunged into almost total lawlessness where anyone who could, got as much as they could and then left the people to fend for themselves. (A situation Putin has at least tried to correct, to his credit) We can see that happening here.
With less and less being done on the federal, state and local level to help those who are not part of the upper echelons of power. And with the treatment of those who challenge these powers - such as OWS - feeling the wrath of the "Dons" for daring to question them. The police behaving more like gangsters and protectors of the mob than anything else.
And you wind up with a multi faced economy. One official. One unofficial. Such as the underground economy here, which incidentally is valued in excess of 2 trillion dollars. I knew a fellow who up until recently lived in Moscow and he would tell my friends and I about this - unofficial economy.
The real tragedy and danger is that the government sees nothing wrong, the right still thinks that everyone will play by the rules - even though they plainly are not, and the left still thinks it can be saved or resurrected somehow. All of whom refuse to accept that the country is far beyond this.
How this will all play out in the end is anybodies guess. It surely cannot continue as it is though. But expect it to get much worse before it gets better.
Comments
The video of the interview.
by cmaukonen on Sun, 06/24/2012 - 9:36pm
I appreciate you keeping us informed the way you do.
Keep up the good work.
by Resistance on Sun, 06/24/2012 - 9:41pm
Thanks.
I do think that with all the paranoid talk on the right and left of us winding up with some fascist/communist dictatorial model, that these have both been summarily discarded some time ago.
That the mafia model is the more likely interim situation as we can now see being implemented.
Especially when you see the "privatization" of so much with the resultant kick backs, bribes and out and out fraud involved.
The list is growing all the time. The FEC, SEC, CDC, Food and Drug, Education, Justice, FCC...the list is endless. And the criminalization of whistle blowing. HA they really do not like "wiseguys" and snitches.
by cmaukonen on Sun, 06/24/2012 - 11:26pm
Maybe even the ATF and the Border Patrol has become corrupted?
Isn't there a prohibition of guns in Mexico?
Al Capone found a way to make a buck, during our prohibition of liquor.
Remember the St Valentines day massacre; the victims were rounded up and commanded to turn around and lay down their weapons, by a man appearing to be a cop.
Are we now between a hard place and a rock?
Fear Al-Qaeda or the mob? Distrust both
Imagine what Capone could have done, with wiretapping capabilties, or drones.
by Resistance on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 4:44am
Thanks for this well-written piece. It depresses the heck out of me, but it's hard to deny that it is what's happening. So how long do you think it'll be before we reach the acceptance stage and give up?
P.S. I've always laughed at how the Right has been forced to embrace the delusion that given the option, people will always do the right thing. To them, it's why regulations are un-necessary. And no-one in the media even smirks at how ridiculous that is.
by MrSmith1 on Sun, 06/24/2012 - 11:27pm
Well I don't think it will be a case of acceptance or giving up. More like coming to the reality of the situation and living accordingly.
The biggest problem with having this king of situation is that it's not self sustaining. Unlike the mob - which was as dependent on the government as it was working outside of it - a country cannot maintain a criminal type organization by itself and will have to change or be changed or collapse entirely.
I brought up Orlov but do not completely agree with his assessment or rather his comparison with the former USSR because at the time of it's collapse and even after, it's envolvement with international finance and trade was minimal.
Where as our is very intertwined. So not only do our PTB have and interest to maintain the current situation, so do other countries. But they to are not in great shape for similar reasons.
We like to look at ourselves here as being some how separate from the rest of the world still, even though the vast percentage of our products come from over seas.
It is the the best interests of the rest of the world to maintain our economy for the present.
When this is no longer the case, we will be dropped like a hot potato. If the populace are paying attention, this will give us time to form appropriate measures to cope. If not, we're sunk.
As for the right, well you know they live in a kind of dream land where everything is beautiful and nothing hurts. What is pissing them off is that the real world is now invading their dream world.
by cmaukonen on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 12:24am
Societies of course never stand completely still. There is a constant unfolding as the various entities respond and respond to each other. Each day the complex adaptive system which is the global economic system becomes more complex. In this sense, no particular system is sustainable - there are too many non-linear interactions, which will force the system to keep morphing into something else.
On the other hand, particular elements, like the "crime bosses" with their network of influence through which they control the system could be sustainable for relatively long period of time.
Because of technology and the expansion of multi-national economic entities that are not controlled by any one single country, I believe we are embarking on a system which has no historical precedence. In other words, comparing it to single state examples, like Russia, has significant limitations. If the controlling entities operated outside the state system, the recourse for the people, even through street actions like OWS, are severely limited. Their own governments become powerless to alter the behavior of the global economic entities who operate outside their jurisdiction.
Yet because they are necessary - ie we can't just stop banking or importing manufacturing materials - the governments are basically forced to stand by and allow them to operate.
by Elusive Trope on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 3:37pm
Waddya talking about, it's really very simple--"they" plan out what's going to happen each year at the Bilderberg Group meeting!
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 3:43pm
The problem is that they can't get the Trilateral Commission to align its strategic plan with theirs. This creates for unpredictability and emergent features which they cannot contain. Moreover, they have not been able to fully suppress the trickster antics of the Club of Rome and the Illuminati.
by Elusive Trope on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 3:48pm
"Tear down this wall".
Imagine the "Combination" saying
The families can work together, we are not really that different.
We need to stop the gang wars, it's costing the families to much.
The Democrats will take New York and Chicago; the Republicans, Florida.
Each Don, will respect each others territory or sphere of influence.
Each of us will have a share in Afghanistan, for the opium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder,_Inc.
Known members
by Resistance on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 7:33pm
Works for me. Hey maybe we can get the garbage taken care of now.
by cmaukonen on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 7:39pm
That's Blackwaters job?
by Resistance on Mon, 06/25/2012 - 7:48pm