The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age

    Republicans revert to the withdrawal method.

    Republicans seem only half there. In the three states where Santorum finally pierced the winner's circle, the overall effect was marred by low levels of participation. Rather than engage in a caucus with such a lackluster slate of candidates, Republican voters preferred to stay home and simply withdraw from the process. Republicans are making a classic mistake in military tactics which may result in further low turnout and other problems.  They are fighting the last war. The public has moved beyond many of the culture wars which Republicans have been able to exploit to their advantage for the last several decades.

    Anti-gay rhetoric is back firing. "Personhood" amendments have failed in several states, including the most conservative one, Mississippi. And Santorum's penchant for out-of-touch sexual mores is as removed from the common place as a Medieval Knight fitting out his wife with a chastity belt before galloping off to the Crusades. 

    Aside from fighting last year's culture wars, the G.O.P is unabashedly behind the curve relative to the public's perceptions about tax policy, crony capitalism and the deficit. By large numbers the public supports the Buffett rule, a minimum tax on the super wealthy. Also, eighty per cent of the populace feels that big business and big government are in bed together and gaming the system. As far as the deficit fight goes, the polls indicate that most voters, including Republicans, put the deficit issue at the bottom of their list of immediate concerns. 

    Yesterday Boehner appeared to be in his cups as he announced an act of Congress to restore freedom of religion following Obama's supposed assault on the Catholic Church over the funding of contraceptives in Catholic affiliated institutions like hospitals. In the last few days polling shows very little actual concern about this issue among the electorate. But Boehner and the Presidential candidates are still attempting to re-create the culture wars of yesteryear. 

    The contraceptive/Catholic Church/religious freedom flap is a red herring. Under the current healthcare program, churches and stand-alone religious institutions are already exempted, it's only the affiliated institutions which hire secular employees that would be affected---and in many states these institutions are already required to offer everyone the standard slate of benefits. No one is forcing anyone to have sex, use a birth control pill, pee into a cup (the Republican favorite),or submit to an examination. Odd, a picture just came to mind of Ron Paul as Merlin in a black robe stirring his cauldron, under threat of immediate death from returning Crusaders to find a remedy for yeast infections.

    Isn't it revealing that Republicans are withdrawing into last year's culture wars just now, when the economy is improving and Obama's approval ratings are rising correspondingly. And instead of focusing on the decay of our aging infrastructure they can't wait to start a war with Iran.. Santorum does not want to engage in recreational sex at home but will at the drop of a hat send young men and women off to die in a new war. That would certainly reduce sexual relations. 

    Romney wants to withdraw from programs which help the poor and feed hungry children---all of this reduction in size for the needy because we can't afford it. But at the same time Romney will give generously to a private "charity" which expends the money trying to convince gay people that there is a cure for their "gayness". As far as Gingrich is concerned, all the metaphors which come to mind are unprintable.

    There was a Revolutionary War General whose strategy was to skirmish with the British and then withdraw. The British would follow. After repeated skirmishes the British had been lured into indefensible terrain and were successfully attacked.  Republicans apparently are trying to imitate this strategy. They have successfully retreated from the economic field of battle but have quite possibly underestimated the degree of backlash from indignant women whose healthcare is being used as a pawn in a trumped up war about religious freedom.   

    The old white male pundits inside the beltway are positing the contraceptive ruling as a mistake on Obama's part. Perhaps so, but I rather think it's the other way around. In fighting last year's culture wars the Republicans, and particularly the candidates, are indelibly defining themselves as extremists---they are attempting to take away from women something regarded as a given, paid for contraception in the context of women's health. Even most Catholic women are against such an intrusion. As far as Romney and Santorum are concerned ,they have withdrawn from common sense as well as the general populace. I think the 2012 election will be payback time. Come the election in November, women in this country are simply not going to show up in the Republicans' camp.

     

    Comments

    Well I cannot find anything to disagree with here.

    I did read an argument that the ennui of the repubs mean nothing as far as the general election because the repubs hate our President with such vehemence and vitriol that nothing will keep them from the November ballot boxes.

    This birth control 'issue' (as if women are going to jump on the bandwagon on this one!) and the 9th Circuit decision only give repubs something to yell about during their town meetings and reality plays.

    Santorum is undersexed and uber-conservative.

    Mitt has a terrible voice.

    And Paul will always get 10% of the vote. hahahah

    There has been good news though.

    I mean Newt has been humiliated.

    the end


    Thanks, Richard. I think all the emphasis on yesterday's cultural wars is dead on arrival with most voters. Of course Romney is falling all over himself to be a real conservative, the whole group moving right. I think Romney's approval of the Konnen Foundation's decision not to fund Planned Parenthood is one of his biggest mistakes. 


    When I saw the Boehner clip on the news yesterday, I wondered how many drinks did Cantor and the Bishop lobby had to buy to get him to say that. You are right the country has moved on. Every 30 or 40 years this country goes through a generational change in politics. The GOP certainly in the weeds and out of touch.

    Boehner seemed drunk or totally embarrassed, or both, to be elevating this faux fight about religious liberty. Or maybe it reflects the fact that Cantor is ready to stick the knife in if he doesn't do what he's told by the social conservatives who took over the party in 2010. 


    Ah, while I am anti-war in the traditional sense, now that it seems important socio-economic/culture issues have been tethered with misnomers (IMO) of WAR in efforts to rally their troops, I'll gladly put my 'boots on the ground' and even engage in non-physical combat to help dismantle their weapons/blather/intent to create societal mass destruction.

    Come the election in November, women in this country are just simply not going to show up in the Republicans' camp.

    Sadly Oxy, too many women subscribe to the perverted processes birthed by males of their species.   Begs the query, which of these two groups are the most disturbing?

    Excellent blog.  Appreciate.  


    Thanks, Aunt Sam. You would think the younger women, particularly independents, would be appalled by the culture war talk of the Republicans, especially women's health care. Many of the moderate Republican women I know actually support organizations like Planned Parenthood. 

    Pundits like Chris Matthews tonight, continue to question why Obama's people didn't see this backlash coming and prevent it through some kind of mediation. I think Republicans are getting desperate to gin up their base, seeing their enthusiasm numbers stagnate while the Democrats' are rising. The low turnout in the Caucasus and primaries must be alarming to them. 


    In revisiting this debacle, I am of the assumption that all of their entities that have employees are non-profit.  If this is erroneous, please advise.

    By the current controversy arguments, wouldn't the same exemption to the rules apply to the Mormons or any other religious organization's holdings that have employees apply? 

    I'm not sure what the current law states about if the secular religious exemptions apply to what is termed a subsidiary of a church's organization that conducts business open to the general public and employing individuals who are not members and participants of the sect.

    However, it was reported earlier that a 'fix' may be for the government to reimburse the church for any expenses incurred for those employees (of course not catholics, because it's a certainty that no catholic would ever violate the Pope's mandate) who utilize the contraception coverage provision.

    I say bull shit no way.

    This is a slippery slope.  And I believe with every fiber of my being (dramatic emphasis) that if the Obama administration capitulates on this, there will be a tidal wave of negativity that will be far problematic for all than the current hoopla.  This, (IMHO) would be an action that would empower the far right conservatives to power on!

    This is a perfect example of why there needs/has to be adherence to separation of church and state, for sure when dealing with commercial business practices.


    I think the dividing line is whether the employees are already subject to such things as requirements for workers compensation insurance. I think most are non-profits, not sure whether C corps would make a difference.

    As to the fix, I think there will be a token accommodation to the Bishops, without denying coverage to the women employees. In the process I think Republicans are further branded as extremists and against women's healthcare. But of course, I could be all wet on that. 


    I think the fix is an excellent idea. As Oxy and others have pointed out, those extra expenses would actually be negative, so that would just mean more money for the government coffers!


    O'Donnell has had a couple of good segments on this. Apparently, the requirements in some of those states, 28 not 40, have "exemptions" of a kind---the institution has to provide this drug benefit if they offer an overall drug benefit. The "out" is they can simply drop the overall drug benefit. So the O team based their rationale of blanket requirements in these states without understanding that exemptions did exist---if they dropped the drug benefit itself.  


    The low turnout in the Caucasus

    I dunno--true, the Chechens stayed home, but the numbers from Ingushettya weren't that bad.

    And, of course, the Georgians voted twice each.

     


    Thanks, very funny. If only we could relocate Missouri over there. But we do need a new term for "red states".


    Dinosaurs didn't use birth control and they died off anyway when things changed.

    Of course, republicans don't believe in dinosaurs.


    Ps excellent piece, oxy.


    Thanks, Erica. I'm never sure when I've crossed the line. But writing is about risk taking. 


    They are behind on everything. The government, society, the economy and foreign policy. Everything.

    They really do believe they can bring back those glorious days of yore. The cold war 1950s if only they just tried hard enough to get their message across.

    Good diary.

     


    Thanks. Watching some of the snippets coming out of the CPAC I don't even recognize this country. 


    There is a terrific article by Andrew Sullivan on the Daily Beast site, "How Obama set a Contraception Trap for the Far Right".