Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
The tao that can be told
is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be named
is not the eternal Name.
The unnamable is the eternally real.
Naming is the origin
of all particular things.
Free from desire, you realize the mystery.
Caught in desire, you see only the manifestations.
Yet mystery and manifestations
arise from the same source.
This source is called darkness.
Darkness within darkness.
The gateway to all understanding.
As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns: the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult one."
More recently Brimelow—a former writer and editor for Forbes and National Review—founded VDARE, which Vandervoort offered the dubious praise of being “one of the most provocative web sites devoted to the immigration issue.” Named for Virginia Dare, the first child of English settlers in the New World, VDARE is described as a “white nationalist hate website” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. One of their writers, Marcus Epstein, who also worked for Pat Buchannan, pleaded guilty to randomly assaulting a black woman and calling her a racial epithet on the street in Washington, DC. A leaflet at the CPAC panel advertised a book available through the VDARE Foundation called America’s Half-Blood Prince: Barack Obama’s “Story of Race and Inheritance”, by Steve Sailer, whom Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting refers to as “a well-known promoter of racist and anti-immigrant theories.”
The panel generally stuck to arguments that do not directly address race or ethnicity in favor of making English the national language...
I was struck by some goings-on at CPAC last week that I did not see reported on basic cable news.
All these folks shaking hands and smiling and being extremely courteous in their demeanor.
Our friend Breitbart was there of course now that he is a a member of the celebrity cable club even though he is one of the lowest forms of dredge it has ever been my displeasure to view.
So The Nation and other mag/sites show up at these fascist activities and record what they see.
It is like seeing Buchanan finally dropped from MSNBC. It took years to get rid of that racist PRICK.
I shall never forget his appearances on Matthews' Hard Ball when Chris would discuss the nature of this fascist's latest book: How Come Hitler Was Not All That Bad (or some such) and then Chris would just break out laughing.
Then Pat would just break into the discussion with comments like:
Well that Holocaust thing all took place during the latter years of the war and Hitler knew nothing about it...
And I would shake my head and involuntarily respond to the screen:
I mean Pat Buchanan was intimating that Adolph the Meat Tenderizer had nothing to do with one of the most serious and satanic attacks upon humanity that had ever been witnessed by man.
Now lines are drawn in the sand and the tide erases these lines twice a day; usually depending upon where one makes one's stand upon the beach.
We have recently seen the conservatives; who at one time drew a line in the beach with regard to the issue of abortion. First it was funding of abortions through government programs. Then it became an issue of insurance companies ever funding abortions. Then it became an issue as to certain exceptions associated with the abortion issue including rape.
So conservatives are against abortion in all cases; even those cases where the woman experiences a pregnancy caused through RAPE.
And then conservatives began an assault on what is dubbed The Morning-After Pill
And now conservatives are actually taking us back half of a century and claiming that any form of birth control is against God's Law.
El Papa wins out in a nation conceived as anti-Papal?
Well at this CPAC debacle there were these panels of 'experts' feigning some think-tank-like professorial study group calling for English-only laws; calling for whites only immigration policies and explaining why women should not be in the military or even in the work work force.
I am not even getting to the obscenities witnessed at this fascist meeting of felons. I mean Coulter calls our President; Flavor Flav.
Steve King calls our President a racist and feels that he should be impeached?
Forget that Steve King brags about getting rid of all environmentally safe mechanisms like modern light bulbs, water saving shower heads and redesigned toilets. I assume this bastard would have been against paper drives in the 50's?
I am told that I should refrain from using the term 'fascist'.
Of course Beck and Limbaugh and others have just under-minded the original meaning of this term which originated really with Mussolini.
That is all I got right now.
CPAC and the Republican Candidates and the Republican Party have drawn new lines in the sand and I just hope the tides erase them as quickly as possible.
Maybe, just maybe, the elections coming this November will act as tides erasing this idiocy!
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.
Jeez. you beat me to it. Good one, Mr. Day. I was thinking along the lines of gluttony, and how CPAC was like MSG.
Oxy I have no sympathy for CPAC or the devil.
hahahahahahaha
You and I shall come upon greater subjects than this. hahahahahahah
Oh, now it makes sense. MSG literally makes me extremely ill, and after watching some of the CPAC debacle, I had the same symptoms!
hahahahahahah
I used to love Chinese take-out in Minneapolis.
Three wives actually loved it. hahahahahahah
Twenty or more frickin years. hahahahaha
I'm sorry.
Cannot stop laughing.
...three. Hmm.
huh. ummm. three...
wow.
What saddens many African-Americans is that Black Republicans can sit among the racist filth in the GOP and not complain. Romney's health care plan was little different than Obama's, but Obama is a "Socialist" in the eyes of Black Conservatives. Rev Jesse Lee Patterson has actually talked positively about Blacks being put on plantations if they don't agree with his rigid religious and political views. Allen west talked about sending fellow legislators out of the country for not agreeing to his narrow viewpoint. Any Republican victory encourages the crazy. Look at the buyers remorse going on in many states after Republican Governors were elected.
Black Republicans get ridiculed because they stand for the ridiculous.
I have contemplated this issue many times
And I am sure I have crossed the line so to speak.
But damn!
I mean you as an individual are offered hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars for representing a side you do not believe in?
Ending a sentence with a preposition is one thing; defending a racist tide is another!
I am not Black. I am not even Hispanic.
And yet whites will sell their souls for any amount of money.
Just ask all presently sanctioned attorneys!
I do not have an answer to this!
I really don't.
Justice Thomas is anathema to everything I have ever believed in my life; even when I was a church going Catholic for chrissakes.
Scalia, the Catholic, is anathema to every single doctrine I was ever taught as a church going Catholic.
Oh, I have lost my thought.
Thru anger I suppose. hahahahaha
I do not know!
Colin Powell, Condy, Bill Crosby, Justice Tommy, there are lots of smart black people who just happen to be Republicans. Getting mad at them is just racist.
ahhhhhhhhhhhh....Bill is a dem. Always has been. hahahahah
Bill never served in your administration.
Colin voted for Barry.
How's tricks?
And there's oft a huge chasm between being intelligent and exhibiting common sense in all ethnic groups. FYI - Powell voted for Obama, he has stated.
Something to calm you down, remember the big picture, that they are the big losers:
So actually, it makes more sense for them to be angry than you!
As you say: Hah!
hahahahahahahahaahah
I keep thinking back to 1955.
I have to admit it's getting better!