Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
Like half the blog entries of 2008, this story starts with Barack Obama. I recently got the Fall 2008 issue of the Harvard Law Bulletin, an alumni publication, with the smiling face of Barack Obama ('91) on the cover, whose promise of leadership and excellence was realized so fully and wonderfully in the years after he graduated law school. Toward the back of the Bulletin is a small-type list of obits. I read these. Especially the ones of younger graduates. And that's how I learned the remarkable and disturbing story of the murder of Melissa Batten, of the class of 1997, shot dead by her husband eight days after she obtained an order of protection. Missy (the name she went by) was 36 when she was killed. She had worked at a large law firm in North Carolina after graduation, but then moved to the office of the Mecklenburg County Public Defender from 2000 to 2002, where she the Bulletin tells us, she "handled hundreds of cases and worked in domestic violence court." This is only one fact. But it tells you a lot about Missy Batten. Like Barack Obama, she had a law degree that would enable her to earn a lot of money. Like Barack Obama before and after graduation, she worked not to maximize her income, but for the public good. Public defenders are not uniformly saints. But like all public lawyers, they have made a decision to work for the public good. And while most members of the public don't know this, public defenders are generally paid less than their prosecutorial counterparts. They are putting their money where their passion is twice -- by taking a low paying job that serves a public interest, and by taking the job that pays less than prosecution. The simple fact is that Missy Batten made a choice to use her (monetarily very valuable) time to do something good. And Missy Batten worked in the area of domestic violence, which of course makes her death even more poignant. News items don't explain how or why she ended up working later for Microsoft, in Redmond, Washington, as a software developer for the Xbox game Banjo-Kazooie. She sounded enthusiastic and engaged when interviewed about that work. It makes me wonder if the work for the indigent burned her out on lawyering, if it was simply a matter of personal style -- her realizing that lawyering was not for her, was less fulfilling that trying to create -- or if it was something else altogether. Unknown. But the rest of the story is painful, and has a tragic inexorability, when read after the fact by the living. Apparently, she had an affair, her husband obtained a gun, and brandished it with the safety off at a restaurant, saying he'd kill himself. He broke into her workplace on July 16, and was caught and led away by security. On July 19 and 20, he called her thirty times and ordered her not to hang up. On July 21, she obtained an order of protection, which was served upon Joseph Batten, ordering him to stay more than 100 yards from her. On July 29, he confronted her in the parking lot of the Redmond apartments where she had moved, and took her life with eight shots from a 9 mm handgun, before dispatching himself with one. In parsing through accounts of what happened between the Battens, or to Missy Batten, there isn't a lot of wisdom or detail. You can learn that the murderer had worked most recently for the maker of Dungeons and Dragons, and had 46 Facebook friends. You can hear platitudinous journalistic tongue-clucking that the victim was a domestic violence lawyer whose knowledge couldn't save her, who put her faith in a piece of paper that couldn't save her. I'm sure that Missy Batten was a very, very smart woman who knew that she was acutely at risk, and knew that brains and paper weren't a cure-all. The most important general wisdom I saw in the many articles about her death was this: "a special shelter may be the only way to keep a woman...safe. Unfortunately, because of funding issues, there are more people in danger than there are safe places to house them." I wrote recently about the importance of bearing witness to suffering around us, especially in this holiday season, especially if we're ok. Barack Obama's election was personal to me, in part because of my pride in having attended his school, and my agreement with his values. Missy Batten's death is likewise meaningful to me: she tried to do good, and tried to create, two deeply important things. There are many, many people in danger of domestic violence, and not enough money, or lawyers, or paper, or jails, on the side of keeping them safe. So I gave today in her name, as Missy's Bulletin obit suggested, to the Eastside Domestic Violence Program (EDVP), working in the Seattle area to protect women in danger. Unlike Barack, Missy's face isn't on a magazine cover today. But she tried to make the world a better place, and gave of herself to help others. Giving to the EDVP, we can do those two things, things that we talked about so much in Campaign 2008. I hope you choose to give too.
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.
Thanks for sharing Missy's story with us, A-man. I share your outrage at the cranky comments in the press that essentially blamed Missy, then cavalierly knuckled in defeat at the enormity of the issue.
I don't have any money, but I have often sheltered friends who were being abused, and there is always personal risk involved. Sometimes police were helpful, sometimes not; same with the courts. I wish there had been help for Missy; she sounds like a gem of a woman.
Thank you for writing this post, Artie. I wish I had some money to spare so that I could give, too, but right now I'm kinda broke. However, I have a poem to share, hoping that it brings to light how good it feels to get away from an abusive relationship. I wish with all my heart that more women were able to do it.
The post got picked up in 08 by a leading law blog, and they (EDVP) made a bit of money out of it. The 15:1 ratio to number of beds needed to actual beds for victims of domestic violence is shocking and depressing. Maybe you could share the link with someone who has more money. I gave before and will again, for my part.