Donal's picture

    Green Stuff


     
    I found a blog called Triple Pundit - People, Planet, Profit - which purports to discuss sustainable business practices. As a reflection of the difficulty of practicing both sustainability and profitability, some articles impress me and some depress me.
     
    After attending a presentation by BMW’s Manuel Sattig at Opportunity Green 2011, a guest author rethinks some reservations TriplePundit has expressed about other EVs in The BMW i3: Advancing Automotive Sustainability

    It turns out that among auto manufacturers, BMW is one of the most sustainable in the world. It was ranked as the second most sustainable global vehicle manufacturer by Newsweek this year, and is the only car company that has been ranked on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index every year since the index’s inception. Now BMW is using it’s expansion into the electric vehicle business as an opportunity to question and rethink their entire business. According to Sattig, BMW is pursing “electro-mobility,” a concept that goes beyond just producing greener cars by redefining the meaning of personal mobility.
    ...
    BMW’s first mass produced electric vehicle will be the BMW i3 which is scheduled for release in 2013, and will be followed by a sporty plug-in hybrid, the i8 in 2014. In designing these two vehicles, BMW looked at its entire value chain to identify ways to reduce its environmental impacts. To address the issue of raw materials sourcing, the company replaced 80 percent of the aluminum and 25 percent of the plastics used in the car with either recycled material or new material produced using renewable energy. BMW worked with the SGL Group for the cars’ carbon fiber components which are manufactured using hydropower, reducing the associated carbon emissions by 50 percent. Both cars will be produced in BMW’s Leipzig plant in Germany using 100 percent renewable energy. This plant has the leanest production system in the European auto industry. As part of the expansion of the factory, BMW improved the space as a working environment by incorporating more natural light and reduced sound levels 50 percent by eliminating the need for a steel press.
    ...
    Instead of taking a car and simply swamping out the combustion engine for an electric drive system, BMW has rethought and redesigned the entire vehicle for its most promising application – as an emission-free urban mode of transport that’s just as innovative and intelligent as its owner is likely to be.

    BMW's cradle-to-cradle efforts sound laudable - like Passiv Haus - but are out of sync with comments by BMW's North American CEO Jim O'Donnell, reported by Detroit News, and blogged by TP in April:

    O’Donnell disagrees with Renault-Nissan CEO, Carlos Ghosn’s prediction that 10% of vehicles will be electric by 2020. I think O’Donnell’s might be a reasonable position, especially if we look to the adoption rate of hybrids as a proxy for the adoption rate of EV technology. ...
     
    O’Donnell [asserts] that EVs won’t work for 90% of the population based on battery range. Since he works for the company that has field tested EVs via the Mini E brand (which BMW owns), I wonder to what extent he has drawn this conclusion from his company’s own data?

    My reaction is that perhaps BMW sees EVs as part of a niche, but a very lucrative niche, and suspects that greenwashing alone won't win over that group of customers. 
     
    But in June, another TP article, Why Sustainability Needs a Makeover, asserted that sustainability has to be more than a niche strategy:  


    Half of Americans think green products are targeted to rich elitist snobs or crunchy hippies. These are not particularly appealing archetypes, especially for something that needs a critical mass. If we want sustainability to reach the mainstream, we need to stop with the niche marketing. As OgilvyEarth’s Freya Williams says, we need to be Bud Light, not Stella Artois. A return to Marketing 101, with a goal of mass appeal, would rely on the fact that humans have a herd mentality and the majority of us just want to fit in. OPower embraces this and influences people to reduce their energy use by comparing them to their neighbors.
     
    82% of respondents said going green “is more feminine than masculine.” Sustainability emblems include tote bags, hemp clothes and smaller cars. No wonder green skews female. The new ad featuring a polar bear thanking a man for driving a Nissan Leaf is a good example of how messaging for this electric car doesn’t match up to what appeals to males in conventional car ads. Tesla Motors, the electric answer to the Porsche, is an excellent example of bridging the gap.
     
    The words “green” and “sustainability” have been stigmatized. It’s in our best interest to drop these terms if we want to bring new people to the table. Method is a great example of a successful sustainable company that doesn’t position itself as “green.”
     
    Guilt-provoking messages don’t inspire behavior change. Sustainability should be framed through fun experiences, not sacrificing oneself for the greater good. Research shows that people are motivated by doing things they enjoy and not by righteousness.

    Frankly the idea of people targeting green products at me creeps me out in a way that BMW's approach does not - even though I'll never be able to afford a Bimmer. Creepier still is another article, Green as a Status Symbol: Why Increased Prices May Increase Sales, suggesting that high prices may be a motivation to buy green: 


    It seems the simple answer would be to find a way to make green products cheaper [but] consumers are willing to purchase green products, even those seen as inferior to traditional products in quality, at a higher price, but not when the price is lowered.
     
    Why? Because of the social status associated with the sacrifice of paying a higher product for the good of the environment. The research indicates that this status motive declines when the price of the green product is lowered because the element of sacrifice no longer applies. These results are not only interesting, they also provide some very valuable insight into consumer behavior that could, in theory, be used to promote the sustainability movement and increase demand for green goods.
    Topics: 

    Comments

    All these posts about electric cars and nothing about recently in-the-news Tesla Motors Model S 

    Tesla’s Musk Says Model S Sold Out; Profit Likely in 2013 - Bloomberg:

    "Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA), a U.S. maker of electric cars, is sold out of next year’s production of its new Model S sedan and should earn a profit in 2013, Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk said in a Bloomberg Television interview.
     

    The company has orders for “more than 6,500” units of Model S to be built next year, Musk said. The premium electric sedan will retail for as little as about $50,000, half the price of Tesla’s current Roadster sports car, he said."

    Also, from 2007 the Senate Finance Committee Testimony of Martin Eberhard CEO and Co-Founder of Tesla Motors Inc. about electric vehicles and battery technologies.

    FYI.


    The Model S sounds cool, but I won't be dropping a $5,000 deposit. This fellow did, and got a 90 second test ride. Range varies from claimed 160 miles in the base model to claimed 230 or 300 miles with battery upgrades in the Signature series. Even if I could justify a $50K car, a 160 mile range wouldn't work for me now, as my usual bi-weekly trips are 150 miles each way. That's cutting it too close.


    Former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe has started an American-made EV company, too:

    On Friday, McAuliffe’s McLean-based GreenTech Automotive unveiled its latest design for the MyCar, an all-electric vehicle that will be built entirely by U.S. workers at a new plant in Mississippi.

    The MyCar is a so-called Neighborhood Electric Vehicle with models that will range in cost between $10,000 and $17,000 depending on the size of the lithium ion battery pack.

    The MyCar has a range of between 40 and 100 miles and a top speed of 45 mph. Future versions will be certified for highway use.

    “It’s a perfect … utility car,” McAuliffe said. “Eighty percent of Americans drive less than 40 miles a day.”

    There are already decent NEVs out there, like GEM, though. People demean them as glorified golf carts, but street legal NEVs always seem to cost as much as a Fit or Yaris. If we knew there were going to be gas lines, both cheap and expensive EVs would sell like hotcakes. But it seems just as likely that recession again will stifle demand for fuel.


    As someone whose daily round-trip commute is about 8 miles (and will be about half of that if they ever open up the Meadowcreek Parkway), I'd consider one of these NEVs as a second car. My wife and I currently have just the one car, and there are times that it's inconvenient. Of course, it's most likely more environmentally friendly (and cheaper) to just have the one car, even if it's not an EV.


    Interesting.  McAuliffe may have the political connections needed to get glorified golf carts certified for highway use.  Still need more information before I would seriously consider one.  How much would insurance be on road-rage bait?  And how is its range affected by traffic jams.  I still burn gas just sitting in traffic in my small, fuel-efficient car but as I understand it, the engine running keeps my battery charged.  How will NEVs do that?  Do they need to.  Maybe they will have one of those kinetic converters but how will those work just sitting still?

    Wow, there sure are lots of things to consider.  


    No lie about road rage bait. This morning I drove down the hill to the light rail on a narrow, windy 25 mph road. I was doing 35 and an SUV with his brights on was still glued to my tail. We turned on to a two lane stretch and he screeched past, running the red light. 

    EVs use less power the slower you go, unless you're running the heating or cooling.



    Latest Comments