Okay, Rand Paul is basically unloved around here.
But I like that he's using the talking filibuster to make his point about Obama's drone policies. That, rather than procedural games, requires some physical, mental and emotional sacrifice. It i in keeping with the spirit of passionate argument and debate, rather than parliamentary trickery.
Also, his demand: that Obama clarify whether or not a weaponized drone can be used against an American and for what purpose, sounds totally reasonable to me.