dagblog - Comments for "OSAMA DEAD: DONALD DEMANDS DEATH CERTIFICATE" http://dagblog.com/arts/osama-dead-donald-demands-death-certificate-10048 Comments for "OSAMA DEAD: DONALD DEMANDS DEATH CERTIFICATE" en hahahhaOkay, so there are at http://dagblog.com/comment/118354#comment-118354 <a id="comment-118354"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118347#comment-118347">Some people say there are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahahha</p><p>Okay, so there are at least 360 'sides' for any one issue.</p><p>And of course, I am a Gemini so I always see two!</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2011 19:59:14 +0000 Richard Day comment 118354 at http://dagblog.com Some people say there are http://dagblog.com/comment/118347#comment-118347 <a id="comment-118347"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118332#comment-118332">It is not that I want more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Some people say there are always two sides to every story. Some people say there are not always two sides to every story. Which side are you on? Personaly I am of two minds on this issue. The meds do help though.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2011 19:35:40 +0000 LarryH comment 118347 at http://dagblog.com It is not that I want more http://dagblog.com/comment/118332#comment-118332 <a id="comment-118332"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118330#comment-118330">And I want Trump to release</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It is not that I want more legalese in this universe, but I sure the hell wish MSM would adopt some burden of proof standard.</p><p>You show your drivers license and the burden of proof as to your identity shifts to the bastard to questions its authenticity.</p><p>You deliver a birth certificate and the burden of proof shifts to the person who would like to question your birth date and your birth place.</p><p>Unless you can come up with something more than speculation, you are forbidden from bringing up this crap on the air!</p><p>There are not two sides to every issue. And if MSM had some standards, the nut cases would not get any air time.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2011 18:39:42 +0000 Richard Day comment 118332 at http://dagblog.com And I want Trump to release http://dagblog.com/comment/118330#comment-118330 <a id="comment-118330"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/osama-dead-donald-demands-death-certificate-10048">OSAMA DEAD: DONALD DEMANDS DEATH CERTIFICATE</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And I want Trump to release a certificate showing the results of an independently done DNA test on his hair concluding that it is real.</p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2011 18:30:41 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 118330 at http://dagblog.com Related to  the latter, Juan http://dagblog.com/comment/118329#comment-118329 <a id="comment-118329"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/117982#comment-117982">Over the years, especially</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Related to  the latter, <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2011/05/birth-certificate-silliness-really-looks-petty-now.html">Juan Cole has a nice illustration up:</a></p></blockquote> <p>Yes, I think this makes the birth certificate thing--and those who have made a thing out of it--look completely ridiculous. </p> <p>If one were to have identified last week a single event that could happen that would make it look completely ridiculous, this was it. </p> <p>Nothing terribly surprising to me in these reported results of this early NYT/CBS News public opinion survey:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html?hp">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html?hp</a></p> <p>I told a friend yesterday I thought Obama might get up to between 60 and 65 percent approval over this, and that how high they go and how long they stay there may tell us something about the public's more durable expectations of Obama on the jobs issue in particular.  We'll see if his numbers rise further.</p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2011 18:28:08 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 118329 at http://dagblog.com Killing Bin Laden and pushing http://dagblog.com/comment/118160#comment-118160 <a id="comment-118160"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118143#comment-118143">The Bush administration were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Killing Bin Laden and pushing Pakistan to confront its terrorist problem is an effort to do just that.</p><p> </p><p>I see such a strong Pakistani element here; in all of this.</p><p>It is so difficult for the peasants, like me to understand because we do not have the entire file.</p><p>And this Administration is indeed treating Pakistan a lot differently and that was foreshadowed in the 2008 campaigns.</p><p>This is turning out to be extremely interesting and should be good for Obama because Pakistan will stay in the news throughout this year and next.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2011 22:58:14 +0000 Richard Day comment 118160 at http://dagblog.com The Bush administration were http://dagblog.com/comment/118143#comment-118143 <a id="comment-118143"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/117982#comment-117982">Over the years, especially</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Bush administration were all masters of obfuscation, misdirection of inquiry, blocking inquiry, goosing terror alerts before elections, changing the subject or changing the war, overt lies and other chicanery mostly for self serving political reasons.</p><p>Osama was perceived by Bushies as a useful boogeyman to call up to scare the voters, to keep us in line, or raise the defense budget, it seems likely he was worth more to George W. Bush alive than dead. Bringing Osama out of mothballs around elections was always a good ploy for the national security party, the GOP.  Why else did Bush not pursue him? There is no evidence Bush ever did anything to make the world 'safer'. Killing Bin Laden and pushing Pakistan to confront its terrorist problem is an effort to do just that.</p><p>I don't blame bloggers for doubting almost anything that came down while Bush was in office, specifically doubting whether Osama was still alive at any point of time after 2001.</p><p>Nice picture at Juan Cole!</p></div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2011 22:27:00 +0000 NCD comment 118143 at http://dagblog.com Same as my TV show: Escalator http://dagblog.com/comment/118130#comment-118130 <a id="comment-118130"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118108#comment-118108">Yeah, but your six hit</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Same as my TV show: Escalator to the Stars!</p><p>All twenty viewers purchased car insurance! ha</p></div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2011 20:36:10 +0000 Richard Day comment 118130 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, but your six hit http://dagblog.com/comment/118108#comment-118108 <a id="comment-118108"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/117984#comment-117984">well thanks kgb, that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, but your six hit <em><strong>HARD.</strong></em></p><p>His hits wear gloves. Featherweight hits.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2011 18:59:43 +0000 quinn esq comment 118108 at http://dagblog.com We met in a board room; no http://dagblog.com/comment/118088#comment-118088 <a id="comment-118088"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/118086#comment-118086">Funny!  I noticed you didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We met in a board room; no cameras allowed.</p><p>One thing about his head. A woman came in every five minutes and combed his hair.</p><p>And his aide kept pointing a gun at me! hahahah</p></div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2011 15:59:04 +0000 Richard Day comment 118088 at http://dagblog.com