dagblog - Comments for "Day of the Dead: The Hit Man as Hero "

Good catch. I think

brewmn — Thu, 05 May 2011 03:18:18 +0000

In reply to Day of the Dead: The Hit Man as Hero

Good catch. I think "progressives" should work double-or-triple time in the service of making the case that Obama is a war criminal guilty of "shooting of an unarmed man in the head."

Could you restate that for

A Guy Called LULU — Wed, 04 May 2011 22:17:00 +0000

In reply to I'm not buying it. That story

Could you restate that for me? I do not understand what you mean. What is it you don't buy into? My idea whch is clearly speculation as is so much when the information we are given keeps changing or the governments story? Or very possibly both?

I'm not buying it. That story

kgb999 — Wed, 04 May 2011 20:30:48 +0000

In reply to There is a very plausible

I'm not buying it. That story was far too exactly-what-we-would-dream-would-happen-to-give-us-the-precise-narrative-we'd-prefer to accept anything but an intentional fabrication. This was a Big Lie game. They know that 90% of Americans are going to take whatever Obama said in his speech and do with it the exact same thing they did with Bush's WMDs.

To me it really looks like an intergal part of this operation was psyops to manipulate the media response - carried out by none other than the POTUS himself (I'm sure under the guise of "reducing backlash" or some other self-justification).

There is a very plausible

A Guy Called LULU — Wed, 04 May 2011 19:43:11 +0000

In reply to Day of the Dead: The Hit Man as Hero

There is a very plausible reason/explanation, why one early lie about how the shooting of Ossama came down was quickly rolled back. After saying that he was cowering behind his wife with a gun in his hand when he was shot they realized that there were live action recordings taken by the Seal who popped an unarmed Ossama in the head. Whoops, better tell the truth on that one, everybody will still cheer.