dagblog - Comments for "Obama Bows Again!" http://dagblog.com/politics/obama-bows-again-1021 Comments for "Obama Bows Again!" en Yes, I suppose the Bernie http://dagblog.com/comment/9581#comment-9581 <a id="comment-9581"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9580#comment-9580">I was playing with G&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, I suppose the Bernie Madoff reference should've made that clear. I'm trying to come up with something clever based off "balls of Stiehl", but I'm getting nothin'.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:40:34 +0000 Nebton comment 9581 at http://dagblog.com I was playing with G's http://dagblog.com/comment/9580#comment-9580 <a id="comment-9580"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9577#comment-9577">Must … fight … inner spelling</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was playing with G's spelling.  I'm sure he meant to type "steel."</p></div></div></div> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:19:30 +0000 DF comment 9580 at http://dagblog.com Oops. Freudian mispelling. http://dagblog.com/comment/9578#comment-9578 <a id="comment-9578"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9577#comment-9577">Must … fight … inner spelling</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oops. Freudian mispelling.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:36:15 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 9578 at http://dagblog.com Must … fight … inner spelling http://dagblog.com/comment/9577#comment-9577 <a id="comment-9577"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9571#comment-9571">Presidents, currency,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Must … fight … inner spelling Nazi …</p> <p>*fails*</p> <p>I was going to let it slide when Genghis said "balls of steal[sic]", but letting it slide twice is beyond my capabilities. Unless we're talking about theft, the word y'all are looking for is "steel".</p></div></div></div> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:31:44 +0000 Nebton comment 9577 at http://dagblog.com Presidents, currency, http://dagblog.com/comment/9571#comment-9571 <a id="comment-9571"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9559#comment-9559">Yes, well you&#039;re not the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Presidents, currency, sodium.  What <i>won't</i> those Asians manipulate?</p> <p>As far as balls of steal go, I'd say they belong to either Hank Paulson or, perhaps to a lesser extent, Bernie Madoff.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:38:12 +0000 DF comment 9571 at http://dagblog.com Don't be stupid. You can't http://dagblog.com/comment/9566#comment-9566 <a id="comment-9566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9564#comment-9564">Would you look deep into</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't be stupid. You can't see souls. You smell 'em. Soul juice is excreted through the pits.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:26:39 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 9566 at http://dagblog.com Would you look deep into http://dagblog.com/comment/9564#comment-9564 <a id="comment-9564"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9559#comment-9559">Yes, well you&#039;re not the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Would you look deep into their eyes to see their souls?</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:13:40 +0000 Orlando comment 9564 at http://dagblog.com Yes, well you're not the http://dagblog.com/comment/9559#comment-9559 <a id="comment-9559"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9556#comment-9556">The tradition of bowing in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, well you're not the president of the U.S. are you? Those Asians are only trying to manipulate him into bowing by bowing first. Obama must have non-bowing balls of steal. If I were president, I wouldn't even shake foreign leaders' hands. They're just not on my level. If they were lucky, I'd wink at 'em.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:21:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 9559 at http://dagblog.com The tradition of bowing in http://dagblog.com/comment/9556#comment-9556 <a id="comment-9556"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/obama-bows-again-1021">Obama Bows Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The tradition of bowing in some Asian countries is akin to a handshake here. Everybody does it. When I lived in Korea, I bowed all the time. Not, multiple times in one meeting, like they do in Japan, but once, when you initially come into contact with someone, as is tradition in Korea. I didn't bow because I was showing my willingness to be subservient. I bowed because people bowed to me first, and, just as it's very difficult to refuse a handshake under all but the most extreme circumstances, it's hard not to return a gesture of respect when it is offered. Once you've got the hang of it, you sort of forget who's bowing first and you just do it, as you would a handshake.</p> <p>I am pretty sure that Drudge and his minions at Fox can grasp this concept. But I'm less certain that a portion of their viewers, who have little to no knowledge of or interest in foreign culture, can understand it. So, as usual, the conservative media is manipulating their followers to score empty political points against a Democratic opponent. Or in other words, they're being assholes. What else is new?</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:06:07 +0000 Orlando comment 9556 at http://dagblog.com