dagblog - Comments for "One of the advantages" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/one-advantages-10258 Comments for "One of the advantages" en Yeah, nostalgia's overstating http://dagblog.com/comment/120116#comment-120116 <a id="comment-120116"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120064#comment-120064">Baker&#039;s pieces are all easily</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, nostalgia's overstating it.<em>Idly speculating about</em>  would be closer. As I idly speculate about your reaction occasionally to stuff I read in the Guardian or the FT</p><p>To be even more unrealistic I speculate about  how some of the dagbloggers would   respond to comments  appearing  on  the right wing blogs. For the first time in  5 years I checked out Just One Minute last week to see how it was  covering  the  Bin Laden affair. Answer: by essentially ignoring it.  But what particularly  struck me about JOM's one post on that affair were the  comments in response.Pretty similar to the ones here..</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 21:05:29 +0000 Flavius comment 120116 at http://dagblog.com I agree completely with the http://dagblog.com/comment/120047#comment-120047 <a id="comment-120047"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120034#comment-120034">I appreciate your point.But</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree completely with the last paragraph and appreciate the two above that.</p><p>As to the first paragraph I clearly caused confusion by joining an old  opinion of Baker's with a current one of Brittan's. .  It was my shorthand for saying  we  benefit of being exposed to people who know what they're talking about whether it's  a leftish Baker wisely  warning about an impending disaster or a conservative Brittan looking backwards.</p><p>We don't benefit from econowhores  being paid to say that the Administration is doing well or poorly.. </p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 20:22:25 +0000 Flavius comment 120047 at http://dagblog.com Maybe there is a simple http://dagblog.com/comment/120068#comment-120068 <a id="comment-120068"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120049#comment-120049">At the &quot;In The News&quot; section</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Maybe there is a simple solution</em></p><p>Click on "<a href="http://dagblog.com/in-the-news">more</a>" to get and use the full "In the News" page, rather than trying to access "In the News" from the little box on the front page, which is basically just a teaser menu.</p><p>(There's only so much any website can fit on a single page, sometimes you have to go to another section. A good example would be Reader Blogs<em></em> at TPMCafe. It did not feed on any main page, you had to go there. Here at least, Genghis has a global feed of all comments on the site which you can use to bounce around to dfifferent sections, all comments on the site being posted everywhere. At TPM, they got rid of that in like 2006, it was a bummer, mho.)</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 17:21:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 120068 at http://dagblog.com I like Krugman well enough, http://dagblog.com/comment/120065#comment-120065 <a id="comment-120065"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120044#comment-120044">I listen to Brad Delong and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I like Krugman well enough, but was never much of a fan of DeLong.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 16:57:46 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 120065 at http://dagblog.com Baker's pieces are all easily http://dagblog.com/comment/120064#comment-120064 <a id="comment-120064"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/one-advantages-10258">One of the advantages</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Baker's pieces are all easily accessed at either the CEPR site, <a href="http://www.cepr.net/">http://www.cepr.net/</a>, or at TPM Cafe.  Anyone can read one and then blog about it here.  So I see no need for nostalgia about anything.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 16:56:23 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 120064 at http://dagblog.com I seem to love looking like http://dagblog.com/comment/120054#comment-120054 <a id="comment-120054"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120048#comment-120048">The blogroll only shows on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I seem to love looking like an idiot, don't I?   ;o)</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 16:00:13 +0000 we are stardust comment 120054 at http://dagblog.com I like dagblog because it http://dagblog.com/comment/120051#comment-120051 <a id="comment-120051"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/one-advantages-10258">One of the advantages</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I like dagblog because it allows regular folks to write about topics and to draw on sources, some expert and some not, and to throw it into the mix.  I also like the way the creative stuff and the news are in separate sections.  I'm not sure how well it would work if experts were featured, because I think that draws in more folks and it becomes harder to do the fairly effective unregulated regulation that goes on here.  Of course, I wouldn't blame the powers that be if at some point they decided that maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to receive some compensation for the time they spend on this thing, and then of course that might cause things to change.  In the meantime, take your shoes off, post, schmooze, discuss, quibble, shout, and enjoy.  </p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 15:34:16 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 120051 at http://dagblog.com At the "In The News" section http://dagblog.com/comment/120049#comment-120049 <a id="comment-120049"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120033#comment-120033">You raise an interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>At the "In The News" section I can scroll across a topic with Firefox and get the pop-up window as well as a link  to/for comments. With Internet Explorer I get no pop-up and can only go to the original article and can only access comments at Dagblog by clicking on someone else's comment, if there is one in the comment section. Maybe there is a simple solution at Dagblog's end or at mine, Firefox solves the problem for me and I haven't persued it, but if others only use IE they may get less from ITN and therefore use it less.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 15:29:30 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 120049 at http://dagblog.com The blogroll only shows on http://dagblog.com/comment/120048#comment-120048 <a id="comment-120048"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120038#comment-120038">Oops; sorry; looks like the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The blogroll only shows on the home page.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 15:20:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 120048 at http://dagblog.com You could omit Cowen.Actually http://dagblog.com/comment/120045#comment-120045 <a id="comment-120045"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120040#comment-120040">Personally I think the In The</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You could omit Cowen.</p><p>Actually someone could scan  them and select the greatest and latest for the dagblogers.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 14:58:13 +0000 Flavius comment 120045 at http://dagblog.com