dagblog - Comments for "Paks to prez: get yourself a new bitch, you terrorist scumbag." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/paks-prez-get-yourself-new-bitch-you-terrorist-scumbag-10268 Comments for "Paks to prez: get yourself a new bitch, you terrorist scumbag." en Pakistan does not, it would http://dagblog.com/comment/120962#comment-120962 <a id="comment-120962"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120923#comment-120923">WikiLeaks: Pakistan Asked for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pakistan does not, it would appear, speak with one voice...</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 May 2011 21:52:55 +0000 jollyroger comment 120962 at http://dagblog.com WikiLeaks: Pakistan Asked for http://dagblog.com/comment/120923#comment-120923 <a id="comment-120923"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/paks-prez-get-yourself-new-bitch-you-terrorist-scumbag-10268">Paks to prez: get yourself a new bitch, you terrorist scumbag.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>WikiLeaks: Pakistan Asked for More, Not Fewer Drones<br /><br /><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wikileaks-pakistan-asked-more-not-fewer-drones-10348">http://dagblog.com/link/wikileaks-pakistan-asked-more-not-fewer-drones-1...</a></p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 May 2011 18:43:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 120923 at http://dagblog.com Its my belief that India has http://dagblog.com/comment/120159#comment-120159 <a id="comment-120159"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120147#comment-120147"> billions in aid and the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Its my belief that India has a better handle on the continent they live than we do. We can leave and let them mind them store. Also, Pak nukes may most likely be a danger to Pak, as the myriad of nuts there, if they got hold of one, seem to have short tempers, lots of local grudges and itchy trigger fingers.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 05:36:16 +0000 NCD comment 120159 at http://dagblog.com  theatre for the peopleTo be http://dagblog.com/comment/120148#comment-120148 <a id="comment-120148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120142#comment-120142">I am convinced that the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em> theatre for the people</em></p><p>To be sure.  But is  the patience and the credulity of the people without limit?</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 02:39:42 +0000 jollyroger comment 120148 at http://dagblog.com  billions in aid and the http://dagblog.com/comment/120147#comment-120147 <a id="comment-120147"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120143#comment-120143">Dream on. Pak will never end</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em> billions in aid and the billions</em></p><p><em>pace</em>, Carl  Sagan....</p><p>I fear you have correctly identified the operative verb  ("you may say that I'm a dreamer..".)</p><p>Still, the  squeeze from the top may raise the pressure in the cooker (there's a mangled metaphor for you), and sooner or later the acronym that is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan">Pakistan</a> will blow up.</p><p>Leaving the Pashtuns to unite, erasing the Durand Line once and for all.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 02:34:50 +0000 jollyroger comment 120147 at http://dagblog.com I am convinced that the http://dagblog.com/comment/120142#comment-120142 <a id="comment-120142"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120141#comment-120141">May we not profitably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am convinced that the yellin' about drones is the same as the yellin' about the Osama op. Much kabuki theatre for the people and their representatives, sturm and drang signifying not much.</p><p>Here <a href="http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=5999&amp;Cat=13&amp;dt=5/15/2011">from Pakistan's 'The News' it's <em>oh ok, whatever you say, sahib, </em>note the qualifier<em> provided the government orders it to do so.</em></a> The CAS is basically just sayin' there--oh I see what you want me to say--we are your great military, we can do anything to protect the country's sovereignity (<em>sotte voce</em>: not that we can do it or are going to do it or want to do it.)<em><br /></em></p><p><span>They can <em>and have</em> used the U.S. drones to get people they want  to see gone via their intel input to us. It's convenient for them sometimes, having the evil imperialist do it. (Cost saving too!)<br /></span></p><p><span>I used to be open minded about my suspicions of duplicity. Ain't no more after the reading available since the Osama op, am now convinced. You can't trust a single thing anyone in power in Pakistan says for public consumption. They like having us, our money, <em>and our drones </em>there when we do what they want done and don't like it when they haven't managed to manipulate us into doing what they want done. When the latter happens, it's never bad enough for them to want to see us go, they're like "oh well, they hit one of the guys we wanted to protect this week, we'll figure out something else."  Ask any Talib or </span>Lashkar-e-Taiba member,<span> they can't trust em  from one day to the other, either.<br /></span></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 01:15:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 120142 at http://dagblog.com Dream on. Pak will never end http://dagblog.com/comment/120143#comment-120143 <a id="comment-120143"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/paks-prez-get-yourself-new-bitch-you-terrorist-scumbag-10268">Paks to prez: get yourself a new bitch, you terrorist scumbag.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dream on. Pak will never end our 'excellent Afghan adventure', it is the gift that keeps on giving. The US has to end it, on our own.</p><p>The Pak Army and ISI are just jousting to get more $$$, or no cut$ and less strings attached (demands like: 'don't arm and support the Haqquani Taliban who cross into Afghanistan and kill people').</p><p>The billions in aid and the billions spent every month on the war by the US are too big a bonanza to end. Plus, if the US leaves the  mountain tribes will be looking for new targets, in Pak. Anyway a few score dead in the tribal regions is no reason to stop the $$ gravy train.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 01:13:18 +0000 NCD comment 120143 at http://dagblog.com May we not profitably http://dagblog.com/comment/120141#comment-120141 <a id="comment-120141"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120139#comment-120139">P.S. I have just put on my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>May we not profitably distinguish the arguably "surgical" Osama Op from the crudity of "death from above" via unmanned drone?</p><p>Albeit both raise sovereignty issues, only drones kill in square yardage quanta.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 23:52:15 +0000 jollyroger comment 120141 at http://dagblog.com the "bitch" part is played by http://dagblog.com/comment/120140#comment-120140 <a id="comment-120140"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120138#comment-120138">Er but:The former US official</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>the "bitch" part is played by a golddigger;</em></p><p> </p><p>Mais oui-comme toujours, n'est-ce pas?</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 23:49:02 +0000 jollyroger comment 120140 at http://dagblog.com P.S. I have just put on my http://dagblog.com/comment/120139#comment-120139 <a id="comment-120139"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120138#comment-120138">Er but:The former US official</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. I have just put on my Pakistan thread <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/pakistan-under-interrogation-lights-10142#comment-120100">a report by Pakistani reporter on what went on in the 'top secret' ISI meeting with Parliament today</a>; might be of interest.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 14 May 2011 23:47:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 120139 at http://dagblog.com