dagblog - Comments for "Head of IMF Strauss-Kahn in Custody for Alleged Sexual Assault " http://dagblog.com/link/head-imf-strauss-kahn-custody-alleged-sexual-assault-10270 Comments for "Head of IMF Strauss-Kahn in Custody for Alleged Sexual Assault " en I guess running off to the http://dagblog.com/comment/120321#comment-120321 <a id="comment-120321"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/head-imf-strauss-kahn-custody-alleged-sexual-assault-10270">Head of IMF Strauss-Kahn in Custody for Alleged Sexual Assault </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I guess running off to the airport to leave the country isn't the best way to handle the situation, anyone in his position must be aware that he could be accused of abuse by any woman he was alone with in his 3k a night suite for even 5 minutes, he seemed to leave in an awfully big hurry.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 May 2011 02:09:31 +0000 NCD comment 120321 at http://dagblog.com Well, that "beats me" echoes http://dagblog.com/comment/120311#comment-120311 <a id="comment-120311"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120290#comment-120290">Looked at the comments list</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, that "beats me" echoes my opening line in this news post, ("Who knows the truth of this?").  I still will withold judgement as it seems like a stretch from an affair with a subordinate to the alleged incident in NYC.  do you think there could be significance to the fact that both of these sexual  "incidents" involving the senior Socialist Party member were exposed in the US? </p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 May 2011 01:39:47 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 120311 at http://dagblog.com Yes, I was aware of his http://dagblog.com/comment/120310#comment-120310 <a id="comment-120310"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120276#comment-120276">It seems Strauss-Kahn is well</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, I was aware of his reputation, although I think it's kind of a large leap to assume he morphed beyond this reputation to being a rapist.  It will be interesting to see how it plays out.  I suspect his political career will not likely survive the scandal regardless of the outcome of a court case.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 16 May 2011 01:33:25 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 120310 at http://dagblog.com Looked at the comments list http://dagblog.com/comment/120290#comment-120290 <a id="comment-120290"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/head-imf-strauss-kahn-custody-alleged-sexual-assault-10270">Head of IMF Strauss-Kahn in Custody for Alleged Sexual Assault </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Looked at the comments list on the news item at Naked Capitalism; out of 98, about 94 declared him guilty; wow.  One commenter left <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4972855.ece">this link from an alleged assault in</a> 2008.  Beats me.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 22:12:15 +0000 we are stardust comment 120290 at http://dagblog.com It seems Strauss-Kahn is well http://dagblog.com/comment/120276#comment-120276 <a id="comment-120276"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120219#comment-120219">Yeah, the problem with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It seems Strauss-Kahn is well known for this sort of thing, This from Gideon Rachman:</p><blockquote><p>(...) let’s acknowledge that it has been an open secret for years that – even by the standards of French politicians – Strauss-Kahn has a reputation as a womaniser.  I remember speaking to a European colleague of his, who was laughing with astonishment at the open lechery that Strauss-Kahn had displayed at an official dinner. Strauss-Kahn was also <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13402845">reprimanded by the IMF board </a>for a “serious error of judgment”, after an affair with a subordinate.</p></blockquote><p>This time he zigged when he should have zagged.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 20:43:01 +0000 David Seaton comment 120276 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, the problem with http://dagblog.com/comment/120219#comment-120219 <a id="comment-120219"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120216#comment-120216">&quot;...it raises the possibility</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, the problem with conspiracies is that they're so hard to prove, not that they don't exist.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 17:16:16 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 120219 at http://dagblog.com I was trying to remember the http://dagblog.com/comment/120218#comment-120218 <a id="comment-120218"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120216#comment-120216">&quot;...it raises the possibility</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was trying to remember the Client 9 you lent us, Lulu.  Google, and found this in a review:</p><p><em>“Client 9″ follows Spitzer’s meteoric rise, starting with his extremely productive years as New York State attorney general. His bold tactics consistently produced the results he wanted. However, his tough talk and harsh prosecutions also made a distressing number of powerful enemies — Ken Langone of Bank of America, Hank Greenberg of AIG and John Whitehead of Goldman Sachs — just to name a few. When he was elected governor, he made another enemy in Joe Bruno, the Republican majority leader of the state Senate."</em></p><p>I believe it.  Plus the film actually went to great lengths to portray him as an er...<em>egocentric asshole.  </em>Plus I hate the tar outta Hank Greenberg.<em>   ;o)<br /></em></p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 17:14:57 +0000 we are stardust comment 120218 at http://dagblog.com "...it raises the possibility http://dagblog.com/comment/120216#comment-120216 <a id="comment-120216"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120184#comment-120184">Yeah, not that it excuses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"...it raises the possibility of someone setting him up..."<br /><br /> Good thing you kept that "someone" as a  singular person. Two or more and you would be  suggesting a conspiracy and be banished to whaco-land where people wonder about the charges against Assange and Scott Ritter [young boys if I remember correctly] and others who annoy so many powerful people.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 17:09:02 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 120216 at http://dagblog.com There were some stories about http://dagblog.com/comment/120210#comment-120210 <a id="comment-120210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120198#comment-120198">Yeah, I almost mentioned</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There were some stories about connections between GOPers and the prostitute, but I can't remember the details, nor vouch for their veracity. It's a damn shame though, Spitzer would have been useful in a <em>real</em> job post '08...</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 17:00:12 +0000 Obey comment 120210 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I almost mentioned http://dagblog.com/comment/120198#comment-120198 <a id="comment-120198"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/120191#comment-120191">Sarkozy comes to mind. He got</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I almost mentioned Spitzer in my comment, even though there was a paper trail from his bank records leading to the prosecution, one wonders why/who in the bank triggered that particular investigation, (given that I've transferred similar amounts as did Spitzer from my own accounts, and it never resulted in a federal investigation of myself).</p></div></div></div> Sun, 15 May 2011 16:35:17 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 120198 at http://dagblog.com