dagblog - Comments for "Prez to taxpayers:"Make my cash problem your friend--Crazy Barry's pay one year, get two, tax bonanza..""

Forget inductive or deductive

Richard Day — Wed, 18 May 2011 03:50:53 +0000

In reply to I suppose from a practical

Forget inductive or deductive reasoning.

I mean ontology is the answer.

WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW?

Ha! hahahahaha

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology

Well; there's the question.

we are stardust — Wed, 18 May 2011 03:50:52 +0000

In reply to It's hard to "follow the

Well; there's the question. It's a bad thing to take back for all concerned. G' night.

It's hard to "follow the

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 03:33:25 +0000

In reply to Do you mean 'is some entity

It's hard to "follow the money" What was wrong with the benign neglect/tolerance that was originally promised?

Do you mean 'is some entity

we are stardust — Wed, 18 May 2011 03:16:08 +0000

In reply to And to whose advantage?

Do you mean 'is some entity pushing Holder to federally prosecute employees, et.al.'? Raw Story has more on the 'et.al.'

And to whose advantage?

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 02:31:12 +0000

In reply to Add to it Obama's DoJ

And to whose advantage? Who's pushing on the other side?

Add to it Obama's DoJ

we are stardust — Wed, 18 May 2011 02:09:14 +0000

In reply to I suppose from a practical

Add to it Obama's DoJ reversals on states that have approved medical marijuana. Jaysus. My state is one; this is messed up trined.

I suppose from a practical

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 01:35:17 +0000

In reply to ...there are known "knowns."

I suppose from a practical viewpoint, a warrant may mean burning a snitch, so perhaps that's the real interest being vindicated here. Otherwise, if it really is only a matter of minutes, why not make the cops pin themselves down as to their probable cause story?

8-1...Did Breyer retire while

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 01:31:31 +0000

In reply to This Supreme CourtNot the

8-1...Did Breyer retire while I was away?

No shjit-it's just about how

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 01:30:09 +0000

In reply to ...there are known "knowns."

No shjit-it's just about how theyare going to call the close ones,. after the fact (at a suppression hearing), with almost infinite latitude to the officers who, not to put too fine a point on it, would be missing out on the 2 for 1 donut hour at Krispycreme if they call in for a warrant...

This Supreme CourtNot the

jollyroger — Wed, 18 May 2011 01:25:59 +0000

In reply to This is scary. Whats next;

This Supreme Court

Not the whole--after all, we'd expect Alito, Nino and Clarence to give the cops carte blanche--but Sotomayor? Kennedy? 8-1?