dagblog - Comments for "Laura enters my life" http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/laura-enters-my-life-1031 Comments for "Laura enters my life" en I'd jump right in with http://dagblog.com/comment/9764#comment-9764 <a id="comment-9764"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9758#comment-9758">Out of curiosity, what would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd jump right in with Lolita. If you decide you're not really a Nabokov fan, you'll at least have read a great book. Cleanse your palate with a few short stories if you like, but you're now probably primed to appreciate Pale Fire. If you haven't abandoned the program at that point, read Speak, Memory. Then everything else in whatever order you like, leaving Laura for very last.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:54:51 +0000 acanuck comment 9764 at http://dagblog.com Out of curiosity, what would http://dagblog.com/comment/9758#comment-9758 <a id="comment-9758"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9734#comment-9734">I might as well wrap this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Out of curiosity, what would you suggest as a starting point? I have my own suggestions, but would love to hear yours.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:56:14 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 9758 at http://dagblog.com I don't think so. I know http://dagblog.com/comment/9757#comment-9757 <a id="comment-9757"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9756#comment-9756">Is that a condition related</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't think so. I know another synaesthete who isn't anywhere near the autism/Asperger's spectrum. (She and Nabokov perceive individual letters of the alphabet as having their own colors.)</p> <p>FWIW, what Nabokov said to the interview question about what language he thought in was somthing to the effect that he thought in a surf of images, from which words churned up like foam. But he was very disingenuous with interviewers, so that should be taken with a good helping of salt.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:54:24 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 9757 at http://dagblog.com Is that a condition related http://dagblog.com/comment/9756#comment-9756 <a id="comment-9756"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9753#comment-9753">For what it&#039;s worth, Nabokov</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is that a condition related to autism? Do you think Nabokov had Asberger's?</p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:47:35 +0000 Orlando comment 9756 at http://dagblog.com For what it's worth, Nabokov http://dagblog.com/comment/9753#comment-9753 <a id="comment-9753"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9750#comment-9750">Dunno. That&#039;s what he said.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For what it's worth, Nabokov was a synesthete -- he perceived individual letters and numbers as specific colors. (There are a lot more people with this ability or affliction than most of us realize.) I'm not sure how that affected whether Nabokov thought in words or not.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:58:00 +0000 acanuck comment 9753 at http://dagblog.com Dunno. That's what he said. http://dagblog.com/comment/9750#comment-9750 <a id="comment-9750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9749#comment-9749">How can a writer not think in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dunno. That's what he said.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:26:55 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 9750 at http://dagblog.com How can a writer not think in http://dagblog.com/comment/9749#comment-9749 <a id="comment-9749"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9746#comment-9746">No, he didn&#039;t. He was asked</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">How can a writer not think in words?</div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:51:35 +0000 Orlando comment 9749 at http://dagblog.com No, he didn't. He was asked http://dagblog.com/comment/9746#comment-9746 <a id="comment-9746"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9675#comment-9675">Sure, but he thought it in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, he didn't. He was asked about this in interviews.</p> <p>Nabokov was raised trilingual. His first words were in English. He spoke English and Russian until he was five, when he began speaking French, too. (Most pre-Revolution Russian aristocrats were bilingual in French and Russian; VN's father was a devoted Anglophile who made sure his children were raised speaking English, too.)</p> <p>In interviews he claimed not to think in words at all, which is a stretch, but he does seem to have thought in a mishmash of the three languages. <i>Ada</i>, on one level, is his attempt to create a trilingual Anglo-Russo-Francophone world which would be his natural paradise.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:37:49 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 9746 at http://dagblog.com I might as well wrap this http://dagblog.com/comment/9734#comment-9734 <a id="comment-9734"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/laura-enters-my-life-1031">Laura enters my life</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I might as well wrap this post up with a mini-review. The Original of Laura is a letdown, clearly the work of a great writer in decline. Nabokov's subtitle was Dying Is Fun. The approach of death plays a major role in it, but it's not as much fun as advertised.</p> <p>I'd also dispute Dmitri's decision to call it "a novel in fragments." It is, at best, a fragment of a novel -- a short, disjointed fragment. I calculate it at about 15,000 words -- the length of a longish short story. But it doesn't work as a short story: it barely has time to introduce its characters, much less tell us a coherent story about them.</p> <p>I'm content to add the book to my library (even though it's much less than I had hoped). But I do worry about those for whom this will be their entry point to Nabokov: they are not going to feel driven to find out what the fuss is about his incomparable earlier work.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:26:47 +0000 acanuck comment 9734 at http://dagblog.com Maybe I've mentioned it http://dagblog.com/comment/9676#comment-9676 <a id="comment-9676"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9673#comment-9673">Which at least one Russian</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe I've mentioned it before, but you haven't seen Karate Kid II until you've seen it in the original German.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:54:34 +0000 Nebton comment 9676 at http://dagblog.com