dagblog - Comments for " ‘Reckless Endangerment’ Authors Interviewed" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/morgensen-and-rosner-interview-reckless-endangerment-10477 Comments for " ‘Reckless Endangerment’ Authors Interviewed" en Here's another one going http://dagblog.com/comment/122147#comment-122147 <a id="comment-122147"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/morgensen-and-rosner-interview-reckless-endangerment-10477"> ‘Reckless Endangerment’ Authors Interviewed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's another one going through that revolving door now; Judd Gregg to Goldman Sucks.</p><p><a href="http://www.www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5188930/judd-gregg-to-serve-as-international-advisor-to-goldman-sachs">http://www.www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5188930/judd-gregg-to-ser...</a></p></div></div></div> Sat, 28 May 2011 02:04:24 +0000 we are stardust comment 122147 at http://dagblog.com You got it, Dick. That Dems http://dagblog.com/comment/122107#comment-122107 <a id="comment-122107"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/122083#comment-122083">This really underlines</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You got it, Dick.  That Dems are as complicit, and  that a Democrat in the WH doesn't have his DoJ running investigations and prosecution is something we have to GET to help change it. </p><p>Pretty bleak assessment of fin-regs they made; they seem to be tracking the additions that the regulators were to have made.  Arrggh. </p><p>I sure agree about the fines they've levied here and there; not any disincentive.  Jail might be, eh?  I guess the DoJ was letting the different banks know if they were about to be looked at, which gave them time and space to arrange a bit of a fine <em>to pre-empt investigation and prosecution.  </em></p></div></div></div> Fri, 27 May 2011 20:54:14 +0000 we are stardust comment 122107 at http://dagblog.com This really underlines http://dagblog.com/comment/122083#comment-122083 <a id="comment-122083"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/morgensen-and-rosner-interview-reckless-endangerment-10477"> ‘Reckless Endangerment’ Authors Interviewed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This really underlines reasons for the lack of prosecution of these criminals doesn't it?</p><p><em>Revolving door</em> is such a quaint term.</p><p>And the dems are involved as much as the repubs.</p><p>Although as has been pointed out in other blogs and sites it looks like there will be prosecutions as a result of the Levin Report and state actions.</p><p>The joke is that although fining the companies might take care of some partial losses by the public, management will just continue to pay themselves billions in bonuses.</p><p>Great links and great blog!</p></div></div></div> Fri, 27 May 2011 17:19:29 +0000 Richard Day comment 122083 at http://dagblog.com From Bloomberg:Off-topic, http://dagblog.com/comment/122081#comment-122081 <a id="comment-122081"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/morgensen-and-rosner-interview-reckless-endangerment-10477"> ‘Reckless Endangerment’ Authors Interviewed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From Bloomberg:</p><p><object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/W8eytu0JQs8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"><param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W8eytu0JQs8" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W8eytu0JQs8" /></object></p><p>Off-topic, washingtonsblog has a piece up called <em><a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/are-our-leaders-incompetent-or-just.html">Are Our Leaders Incompetent..</a>.Or Just Pretending?  </em>In one section he mentions some of this administration's financial policies:</p><p><em>Obama's Economic Incompetence</em></p> <p><em>Obama - like Bush before him - also appears to be totally incompetent with regard to the economy. He hasn't been able to rein in the giant banks or significantly lower unemployment. Obama is following disproven models, and has appointed economists who either helped cause the crisis in the first place, or who have drunk the kool-aid of <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/01/economists-fall-back-into-neoclassical.html">failed economic theory</a>.</em></p> <p><em>But Obama has actually been serving "his constituency": Goldman Sachs and the other <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/03/82-of-americans-clamp-down-on-wall.html">Wall Street giants which funded his campaign</a>.</em></p> <p><em>And as I <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/did-fed-economist-slam-bloggers-for.html">pointed out</a> last year, top economists running the Fed and advising Obama don't miss the dangers to the economy due to negligence, but because they are rewarded for doing so...(and there's more)<br /></em></p><p><em><br /></em></p></div></div></div> Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:06 +0000 we are stardust comment 122081 at http://dagblog.com