dagblog - Comments for "Disturbing Video: Hilda Solis on CNBC"

You might want to read this

cmaukonen — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:03:46 +0000

In reply to Supremely depressing that the

You might want to read this comment and the blog it goes to over at FDL sometime as well.

Supremely depressing that the

we are stardust — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:51:42 +0000

In reply to Dang me Stardust, that is a

Supremely depressing that the 'liberal' think tanks having been embracing other-than-progressive economics. Guess that's where the sponsor's money goes. A closing window to hear alternatives.

Actually they both suck but

cmaukonen — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:45:07 +0000

In reply to We seem to be talking apples

Actually they both suck but that's beside the point. If there is one.

We seem to be talking apples

EmmaZahn — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:40:00 +0000

In reply to Emma, I'm going to have to

We seem to be talking apples and oranges.

I was critiquing the interview performances of the Secretary and the 'reporters', not administration policy which is rather sucky.

Deer in headlights is a good

EmmaZahn — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:37:29 +0000

In reply to I'd disagree, Emma; she was a

Deer in headlights is a good description of her performance but pinning her performance on administration policies seems a stretch. Talking points; not policy are the arrows she needed in her quiver. But even the best arrows are of no use if you fail to use them.

The way the 'reporters' went after her, I would not be surprised if she was not set up. Still, anyone who has had any exposure to the media since the advent of gotcha jouornalism should anticipate being got.

Dang me Stardust, that is a

cmaukonen — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:29:43 +0000

In reply to Who would you suggest they

Dang me Stardust, that is a good read and no mistake.

Me, of course ...

Donal — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:13:16 +0000

In reply to Who would you suggest they

Me, of course ...

Who would you suggest they

we are stardust — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:11:56 +0000

In reply to Unfortunately, the jobless

Who would you suggest they vote FOR?

Please read Yves on the Incredibly Shrinking Overton Window of Faux-liberal economic policy. Can't even count on NewDeal 2.0 or the Roosevelt Instutue any longer.

Unfortunately, the jobless

Donal — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:57:30 +0000

In reply to Emma, I'm going to have to

Unfortunately, the jobless won't be taken seriously until they start a - voting, and b - voting for their own interests.

Emma, I'm going to have to

cmaukonen — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:47:15 +0000

In reply to That is disturbing. Someone

Emma, I'm going to have to agree with Stardust on this. Totally out of touch. The Malls here are like mausoleums and houses are sitting empty and little by little more and more businesses are closing.