dagblog - Comments for "Republican Semantics" http://dagblog.com/politics/republican-semantics-10570 Comments for "Republican Semantics" en As long as the accepted truth http://dagblog.com/comment/123106#comment-123106 <a id="comment-123106"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123017#comment-123017">Yeah, I looked at that and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As long as the accepted truth includes that Newt is an intellectual genius, Romney could "run the US as a successful business," and other similar BS, we have to conclude that the republicans are doing a pretty good job of controlling the message.</p><p> </p><p>However, I don't think that even they are winning the semantic war that their only intention is "TO SAVE MEDICARE!"   Even those who usually swallow their other nonsense realize that this is an attack on the middle class.  However, since they continue to vote against common sense, they may do the same come November 2012.  </p><p> </p><p>I do think the Wisconsin, Ohio, and Florida horror shows may wake some people up.  Who knows?</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:24:01 +0000 CVille Dem comment 123106 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I looked at that and http://dagblog.com/comment/123017#comment-123017 <a id="comment-123017"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/122980#comment-122980">Misspelling &quot;grammatical?&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I looked at that and thought about the double M, but spell check didn't pick it up and I was too lazy to double check. My bad. :)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jun 2011 00:08:29 +0000 Orlando comment 123017 at http://dagblog.com Sham on you, quine! http://dagblog.com/comment/122998#comment-122998 <a id="comment-122998"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/122980#comment-122980">Misspelling &quot;grammatical?&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sham on you, quine!</p></div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:55:58 +0000 CVille Dem comment 122998 at http://dagblog.com Misspelling "grammatical?" http://dagblog.com/comment/122980#comment-122980 <a id="comment-122980"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/republican-semantics-10570">Republican Semantics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Misspelling "grammatical?" ;-)</div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:31:10 +0000 quinn esq comment 122980 at http://dagblog.com Bullies are bullies because http://dagblog.com/comment/122976#comment-122976 <a id="comment-122976"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/republican-semantics-10570">Republican Semantics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bullies are bullies because they know they can get away with doing as they damn well please and those that do haul them on the carpet really can't and won't do much to stop them.</p><p>As in the case of the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">voucher</span> saving Medicare bill introduced by Ryan, call it whatever you wish, but the more Democrats identify it as a voucher, with supporting facts it is not a savings solution as claimed, the more riled their base will get and end up standing toe-to-toe against a perceived liberal onslaught to discredit the efforts of their Senators and Representatives to fix the mistakes of past Democrat administrations.</p><p>So long as Obama thinks bipartisanship will eventually triumph, the GOper's have a free hand in twisting and manipulating their efforts to undermine both the Administration and the current law of the land to bring about the changes their Party desires, regardless of what the larger public expects of them.</p><p>The only way the political bullies can be controlled would be for Obama to use the bully pulpit of his office to make GOPer's and tea-baggers sorry their mother's gave birth to them.</p><p>I'm not holding my breath.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:11:38 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 122976 at http://dagblog.com Well... I am not saying that http://dagblog.com/comment/122969#comment-122969 <a id="comment-122969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/republican-semantics-10570">Republican Semantics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well... I am not saying that this applies to 'all' republicans but...</p> <p>stupid is as stupid does.</p> <p>You can get blood from a turnip... etc.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:39:34 +0000 synchronicity comment 122969 at http://dagblog.com Not as easy at sounds...for http://dagblog.com/comment/122962#comment-122962 <a id="comment-122962"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/republican-semantics-10570">Republican Semantics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not as easy at sounds...for them.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:10:32 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 122962 at http://dagblog.com