dagblog - Comments for "Capitalism FAIL" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/capitalism-fail-10623 Comments for "Capitalism FAIL" en It's not the workers' http://dagblog.com/comment/123616#comment-123616 <a id="comment-123616"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123507#comment-123507">Too much kool-aid, destor. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's not  the  workers' headcount  that supports social security, it's the economy. If we grow the economy by 5%/year it will support social security whether that's done by increasing the work force or increasing the output per capita. .</p><p>Some economists are consisent on this point. But manyproject healthy growth rates for the economy and simultaneously moan that ss won't be affordable because of the declining  ratio of workers vs retirees.Tilt.. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:42:31 +0000 Flavius comment 123616 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for posting this http://dagblog.com/comment/123542#comment-123542 <a id="comment-123542"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123502#comment-123502">Not very good at forming</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for posting this article. This is a question I've wondered about many a time.</p><p>One reason is... our population is growing, so we need more jobs for more people. The other point may be that an organization has to grow or it will start to die away. He not busy born is busy dying kind of thing.</p><p>And then there's the thought that the economy is always moving, never standing still: new inventions, new products, new ways of doing things, new tastes mean that existing companies need to keep adapting--growing, if you will--to stave off obsolescence and death.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:47:59 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 123542 at http://dagblog.com Yes, assuming all those http://dagblog.com/comment/123541#comment-123541 <a id="comment-123541"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123500#comment-123500">I already posted a news</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, assuming all those immigrants can get jobs. Otherwise, it becomes its own kind of bomb--masses of unemployed young people.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:41:38 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 123541 at http://dagblog.com I agree with you, Emma. http://dagblog.com/comment/123510#comment-123510 <a id="comment-123510"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123507#comment-123507">Too much kool-aid, destor. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree with you, Emma.  Though I do think the more the merrier.  I support open borders for a lot of econonomic and cultural reasons.  The U.S. frankly needs a huge social shake-up.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:20:31 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 123510 at http://dagblog.com Back To Paying More Taxes http://dagblog.com/comment/123508#comment-123508 <a id="comment-123508"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123491#comment-123491">I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the system</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Back To Paying More Taxes Abroad Than To Uncle Sam; Someone Say Jobs, Repatriation, Fair Trade <a class="twitter-timeline-link" title="http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2011/06/back_to_paying_more_taxes_abroad_than_to_uncle_sam_someone_say_jobs_repatriation_fair_trade.html/" rel="nofollow" href="http://buswk.co/j0xQTH" target="_blank">http://buswk.co/j0xQTH</a></p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:17:54 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 123508 at http://dagblog.com Too much kool-aid, destor. http://dagblog.com/comment/123507#comment-123507 <a id="comment-123507"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123503#comment-123503">The social safety net</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Too much kool-aid, destor.  </p><p>Safety nets do not help people who are under them, e.g. the unemployed.  Besides they are by definition full of holes.  </p><p>Adding more people to the mix with open borders does not seem like a workable solution. AND, Social Security is not broke.   It does not need fixing.</p><p>Say it over and over and over and over.  Just like the opposition repeats their points.  </p><p>SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT BROKE.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:16:18 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 123507 at http://dagblog.com Trade tariffs only result in http://dagblog.com/comment/123504#comment-123504 <a id="comment-123504"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/capitalism-fail-10623">Capitalism FAIL</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Trade tariffs only result in trade wars and eventually shooting wars.</p></blockquote><p>FWIW Keynes argued the opposite..According to Skidelsky</p><blockquote><p>That free trade combined with the intrnational mobility of capital was more likely to provoke war than keep peace</p></blockquote><p>In the first decade of the 20th century the conventional wisdom was that there could never be another war because of the growing interntional trade links.He'd seen that disproven. And then seen the Great Depression.By 1933 in an address in Dublin he said</p><blockquote><p>But let goods be homespun whenever.....possible and above all let finance be primarily local.</p></blockquote><p>If the US imposed stiff tariffs it would solve our unemployment problem. If we returned to Ike's tax laws we'd solve our growing inequality problem and probably our deficit one It's not that Capitalism can't work, it's the way we have implemented it that can't work.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:09:00 +0000 Flavius comment 123504 at http://dagblog.com Not very good at forming http://dagblog.com/comment/123502#comment-123502 <a id="comment-123502"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123493#comment-123493">I read a quippy little post</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not very good at forming sentences this morning but your comment reminded me of something I just read yesterday.  </p><p>Reuters op-ed editor James Ledbetter poses the question, "Must we always try to grow the economy?" <a class="twitter-timeline-link" title="http://blogs.reuters.com/macroscope/2011/06/07/must-we-always-try-to-grow-the-economy/" rel="nofollow" href="http://t.co/VMJAUNL" target="_blank">http://t.co/VMJAUNL</a></p><p>and this as well</p><p>Bill Clinton: universal health coverage saves money <a class="twitter-timeline-link" title="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/07/us-healthcare-clinton-idUSTRE7566U520110607/" rel="nofollow" href="http://t.co/0W7dmHR" target="_blank">http://t.co/0W7dmHR</a></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:01:57 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 123502 at http://dagblog.com The social safety net http://dagblog.com/comment/123503#comment-123503 <a id="comment-123503"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123501#comment-123501">I think it will pay off</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The social safety net problems are demographic, right?  Not enough workers supporting too many retirees... so bring in more workers.  More workers leads to more demand which leads to more demand for workers and the tax base is sufficiently broadened so that Social Security and Medicare are paid for by all of these new taxpayers.  If you combined open borders with good, progressive taxation aimed at making sure the middle class gets a rising share of income, you're golden.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:58:47 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 123503 at http://dagblog.com I think it will pay off http://dagblog.com/comment/123501#comment-123501 <a id="comment-123501"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123493#comment-123493">I read a quippy little post</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>I think it will pay off hugely for us in 50 years.</p></blockquote> <p>We should take a risk for some pie in the sky future? "Hey you downtrodden American workers it will get better in 50 years"</p> <p>What have you been smoking, because something has affected your thinking?</p> <p>I'd could go along with your plan, if you first strengthen the Social safety net and those of us already grandfathered in;  would retire early and then we could allow the corporations to have all kinds of growth by allowing them more worker (wage slaves)</p> <p>Why should we allow only the corporations the ability to have a good life by using wage slaves .</p> <p>I am not so sure your morality is any better than Weiners?</p> <p>Corporations: "Come all you on the other side of the border, come and satisfy your materialistic desires" "Help us defeat the American workers outlandish demands for an improved standard of living, clean air and water is too heavy a price so eliminate them and watch us grow.</p> <p>Corporations:  Who cares that while you immigrants will defintiely see the benefits, your American counterpart will just have to accept less. In 50 years you'll go through the same hell.</p> <p>"But hey 50 years is a long time,so dont worry, you'll soon discover Destor didnt know what he was talking about; besides he's been gone for years."</p> <p>50 years from now some new Open borders crowd advocate, will try to convince Americans</p> <p>Open the Borders, so Coporations can grow.  </p> <p>The working class trampled, becoming the fertilizerfor this new growth.</p> <p>Hey Destor, they say I have this growth on my arm, caused by the sun. Growth is good right?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:54:02 +0000 Resistance comment 123501 at http://dagblog.com