dagblog - Comments for "Obama Thinks Worker Skills Are The Problem?" http://dagblog.com/link/obama-thinks-worker-skills-are-problem-10631 Comments for "Obama Thinks Worker Skills Are The Problem?" en 100 years from now economic http://dagblog.com/comment/123845#comment-123845 <a id="comment-123845"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123841#comment-123841">Sure, they live in the same</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>100 years from now economic historians will look back on our Free Trade philosophy and think we were out of our minds.</p><p>How could we even  have contemplated  exposing our own citizens to competition from the subsistence level wages available as each developing country reaches a stage of  political stability that makes it an attractive production site. ? Doesn't that inevitably point towards our developing our own under class of unemployed ,under educated, under serviced "proles". ?</p><p>Madness. </p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:28:02 +0000 Flavius comment 123845 at http://dagblog.com breath. I don't spel so good. http://dagblog.com/comment/123844#comment-123844 <a id="comment-123844"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123838#comment-123838">What is my &#039;breat&#039;, and how</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>breath</p><p>. I don't spel so good.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:17:55 +0000 Flavius comment 123844 at http://dagblog.com Sure, they live in the same http://dagblog.com/comment/123841#comment-123841 <a id="comment-123841"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123775#comment-123775">Yes. I agree. You have a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure, they live in the same WTO world. That doesn't mean they mirror our free trade policies or align the regulatory and taxation incentives in the direction of encouraging corporations to move their work force's employment to third-world economies.</p><p>Their manufacturing may be competitive ... but comparatively, their CEO compensation sucks ass.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:00:47 +0000 kgb999 comment 123841 at http://dagblog.com What is my 'breat', and how http://dagblog.com/comment/123838#comment-123838 <a id="comment-123838"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123830#comment-123830">I don&#039;t argue that no country</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What is my 'breat', and how do you know I was holding it...? Is this more of that sexual innuendo I'm not understanding...?</p><p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">and if so, is this webcam on or something...grumble grumble</span></p><p>Note to self: change pseudonym. </p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:03:06 +0000 Cho comment 123838 at http://dagblog.com I don't argue that no country http://dagblog.com/comment/123830#comment-123830 <a id="comment-123830"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123775#comment-123775">Yes. I agree. You have a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't argue that no country anywhere will ever resist the impeccable capitalistic  logic which  dictates whenever  possible outsourcing  production to subsistence-wage venues. Just don't hold your breat.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:34:02 +0000 Flavius comment 123830 at http://dagblog.com Germany and Japan were http://dagblog.com/comment/123784#comment-123784 <a id="comment-123784"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123775#comment-123775">Yes. I agree. You have a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Germany and Japan were completely modernized after the war; giving them an advantage.  </p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:18:00 +0000 Resistance comment 123784 at http://dagblog.com Yes. I agree. You have a http://dagblog.com/comment/123775#comment-123775 <a id="comment-123775"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123767#comment-123767">Hourly compensation rates in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes. I agree. You have a wonderful theory that OUR WORLD SADLY WON'T LIVE UP TO.</p><p>I'm sure there's a wonderful world out there where it does apply. I hope you find it.</p><p>;0)</p><p>Again. Germany. Japan. Competitive manufacturing. They live in the same WTO world as the US. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:39:57 +0000 Cho comment 123775 at http://dagblog.com Hourly compensation rates in http://dagblog.com/comment/123767#comment-123767 <a id="comment-123767"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123739#comment-123739">High unemployment is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hourly compensation rates in 2007</p><p>US<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>30.56,Korea 18.36,Singapore 15.43,Taiwan 8.15,Mexico 3.91..</p><p>Combine these rates with  the  container ship- and it follows that manufacturers must  out source internationally to remain competitive. Unless we accept Keynes advice to</p><blockquote><p>"let  goods be homespun whenever it is...possible"..</p></blockquote><p>How to make that happen </p><blockquote><p>The virtue of protection is that it does the trick</p></blockquote><p>According to Skidelsky Keynes view was that "Free trade policy was part of an .....argument....... in which employment would always be distributed in line with comparative  advantage." But </p><blockquote><p>          ......most modern mass-production pocesses can be perfomed in most countries and climates with almost equal efficiency</p></blockquote><p>i.e.it's not efficient to make things in Seoul and ship them to be used in Detroit instead of just making them in Detroit. </p><p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:12:43 +0000 Flavius comment 123767 at http://dagblog.com High unemployment is the http://dagblog.com/comment/123739#comment-123739 <a id="comment-123739"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123734#comment-123734">High unemployment is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>High unemployment is the result of  free trade.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&amp;language=en&amp;pcode=teilm020&amp;tableSelection=1&amp;plugin=1">Germany unemployment: 6.1%</a></p><p><a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&amp;language=en&amp;pcode=teilm020&amp;tableSelection=1&amp;plugin=1">Japan unemployment (pre Tsunami): 4.6%</a></p><p><a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&amp;language=en&amp;pcode=teilm020&amp;tableSelection=1&amp;plugin=1">Netherlands unemployment: 4.2%</a></p><p>etc.</p><p>I don't think free-trade is an adequate explanation. Labor market can do alot.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:14:39 +0000 Cho comment 123739 at http://dagblog.com High unemployment is the http://dagblog.com/comment/123734#comment-123734 <a id="comment-123734"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obama-thinks-worker-skills-are-problem-10631">Obama Thinks Worker Skills Are The Problem?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>High unemployment is the result of  free trade.And there are no steps Obama or anyone else can take to restore full employment as long as corporations have to choose between a $20/hour American worker or a $5/hour East Asian.</p><blockquote><p>The thing about tariffs is....they do the trick</p></blockquote><p>Keynes</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:04:24 +0000 Flavius comment 123734 at http://dagblog.com