dagblog - Comments for "GOP in the HOR - Renewable Energy is Anti-Energy! Whaaaat????" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/gop-hor-renewable-energy-anti-energy-whaaaat-10665 Comments for "GOP in the HOR - Renewable Energy is Anti-Energy! Whaaaat????" en We are being outspent by http://dagblog.com/comment/123886#comment-123886 <a id="comment-123886"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123880#comment-123880">They ain&#039;t after your sanity,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We are being outspent by China by the EEU and so many other nations in the area of renewable energies.  But we the people are allowing it to happen, people would rather center on Weiner's weiner rather than the real issues that impact the entire nation and the world. How many blogs and columns talk about Weiner, how many people know that the HOR Republicans want to kill NREL? Everywhere I go, now on Gawker I expect the main topic to be Weiner's weiner, but unfortunately it it everywhere. Certainly news organizations by and large are not covering this topic, I sure don't see it at FDL, KOS, or msnbc, cnn, nbc news, abc news or cbs news. But you know what they are covering today, Sarah Palin's emails. Okay, now I am officially being driven crazy.... </p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:38:58 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 123886 at http://dagblog.com Open Secrets tracks some of http://dagblog.com/comment/123883#comment-123883 <a id="comment-123883"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123876#comment-123876">Why sell your soul for such a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Open Secrets tracks some of these things Dick, that is where I obtained the information. We know why they do it though, don't we, that money helps them get reelected for the rest of their lives. And I would not have an argument against that if they voted in the best interest of the population, as opposed to voting and crafting legislation that benefits those particular industries. Strike that, those industries are allowed to craft legislation now, soooooooo... given that fact, maybe there should a movement to outlaw lobbyists from crafting and contributing to crafting legislation.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:26:00 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 123883 at http://dagblog.com They ain't after your sanity, http://dagblog.com/comment/123880#comment-123880 <a id="comment-123880"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123877#comment-123877">@Jollyroger, I might agree</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They ain't after <strong>your</strong> sanity, nor mine.  We are collateral damage...<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/business/09subsidies.html?src=me&amp;ref=business">#the price of madness</a></p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:17:13 +0000 jollyroger comment 123880 at http://dagblog.com I am now going to apparently http://dagblog.com/comment/123879#comment-123879 <a id="comment-123879"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123875#comment-123875">I am a big believer in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am now going to apparently contradict the above. We need to pursue these alternative forms of energy for this reason.</p><p>The only reason that oil and gas are still viable is because they can still be retrieved in massive quantities. Once this is no longer the case, their economic viability decreases markedly.  It is not practical from a financial point of view to retrieve either in small quantities since the initial costs and over head of doing so keeps going up. And this will happen far sooner than the oil and gas itself will be used up.</p><p>And atomic energy has already reached this point. Believe me the power companies have been paying very close attention to what has been going on with the TEPCO plants in Japan. Which is why they have been shying away themselves from atomic power.  It's simply far too expensive to build them in a manner that is safe enough to prevent an accident and the financial consequence of an accident make them very unattractive.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:11:19 +0000 cmaukonen comment 123879 at http://dagblog.com @Jollyroger, I might agree http://dagblog.com/comment/123877#comment-123877 <a id="comment-123877"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123874#comment-123874">Those whom the gods would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>@Jollyroger, I might agree with you, but I don't let them drive me mad. By writing and informing people about some of the other issues out there that matter I not only feel better, but I think maybe at least one or two people might take that information and pass it on and take some action themselves and that is how we make change, by being active. At least that is what I think.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:05:51 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 123877 at http://dagblog.com Why sell your soul for such a http://dagblog.com/comment/123876#comment-123876 <a id="comment-123876"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/gop-hor-renewable-energy-anti-energy-whaaaat-10665">GOP in the HOR - Renewable Energy is Anti-Energy! Whaaaat????</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why sell your soul for such a small amount of money?</p><p>And you supposedly would not even pocket the money since it goes into a campaign chest.</p><p>Unless your wife or son is receiving some executive job worth a million?</p><p>Or two years later you quit and join the 'firm'?</p><p>Does anybody track these things?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:57:39 +0000 Richard Day comment 123876 at http://dagblog.com I am a big believer in http://dagblog.com/comment/123875#comment-123875 <a id="comment-123875"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/gop-hor-renewable-energy-anti-energy-whaaaat-10665">GOP in the HOR - Renewable Energy is Anti-Energy! Whaaaat????</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am a big believer in alternative energy. Especially since <strong>I HATE POWER UTILITIES</strong> nearly as much as I hate banks.</p><p>The biggest problem with alternative energy though, is efficiency. Photovoltaics as you can see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PVeff%28rev110408U%29.jpg">in this chart</a> have a maximum efficiency of around 48% not bad. But look at the <a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3434">spectrum utilization</a>. We still do not have potovoltaic cells that work well in the ultraviolet region. Necessary for cloudy and overcast days.</p><p>The other problem is with transmission, which with our current system of high voltage 60Hz is very inefficient for most forms of alternative power.You have to convert the DC power that you get with photovoltaics to this AC power and that waists energy in the form a heat and magnetic losses - heat again.</p><p>Of course you can have individual alternative power sources but you still have the same problems since all our electronic, heating, cooling, cooking etc. is designed for 120/240 volt 60Hz power.</p><p>You either have to convert the DC or redesign the devices themselves. Then you also need batteries. The most economical of which are still lead acid types which require maintenance. And periodic replacement which means what to to with the acid and the lead.</p><p>Their are other batteries being developed that are more efficient and smaller but they too use materials that need to be disposed of or recycled carefully.</p><p>It will eventually happen but the big factor is the time needed to make it affordable to the masses, not just those that are well fixed. </p><p>Consider the automobile. It was available for a long time but did not take off until Henry Ford and others made it affordable to the masses.</p><p>Wind power is great but it has it's problems as well. Like turning our feathered friends into to puree of feathered friends. You also need wind and it does not always blow. They are also noisy. All stuff that makes them less attractive.</p><p>There was great interest in fuel cells a while back but that has faded as the reality of acquiring the hydrogen necessary is energy intensive. Plus storage and the hazards there of.</p><p>In short there ain't no free lunch. All these need to be explored further but will take time to mature.</p><p>Just a heads up.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:50:26 +0000 cmaukonen comment 123875 at http://dagblog.com Those whom the gods would http://dagblog.com/comment/123874#comment-123874 <a id="comment-123874"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/gop-hor-renewable-energy-anti-energy-whaaaat-10665">GOP in the HOR - Renewable Energy is Anti-Energy! Whaaaat????</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Those whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad...</p></div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0000 jollyroger comment 123874 at http://dagblog.com