dagblog - Comments for "Obama to Name Financial Regulators" http://dagblog.com/link/obama-name-financial-regulators-10673 Comments for "Obama to Name Financial Regulators" en Is that it? Like keeping all http://dagblog.com/comment/124007#comment-124007 <a id="comment-124007"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123995#comment-123995">It does sort of become a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is that it?  Like keeping all or most of the Monica Goodling-vetted appointees to the DoJ; it's perplexing and irritating, I confess.  More 'bipartisanship for its own sake'?  Or worse?  When you go to his economic and military choices, it makes one wonder, no?</p></div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:01:12 +0000 we are stardust comment 124007 at http://dagblog.com An Internet X-file. ;o) http://dagblog.com/comment/124006#comment-124006 <a id="comment-124006"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123975#comment-123975">thanks for the correction,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>An Internet X-file.  ;o)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:59:07 +0000 we are stardust comment 124006 at http://dagblog.com It does sort of become a http://dagblog.com/comment/123995#comment-123995 <a id="comment-123995"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123969#comment-123969">Niiiiiice.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It does sort of become a "tell", at some point.  A presnit who doesn't exercise the low hanging fruit of administrative appointment really does not want power and should find a different line of work.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:38:25 +0000 jollyroger comment 123995 at http://dagblog.com thanks for the correction, http://dagblog.com/comment/123975#comment-123975 <a id="comment-123975"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123972#comment-123972">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thanks for the correction, don't know how I ended up doing that-bizzarro.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:57:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 123975 at http://dagblog.com http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0 http://dagblog.com/comment/123972#comment-123972 <a id="comment-123972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123968#comment-123968">Oopsie; the link went to a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/11/opinion/11nocera.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/11/opinion/11nocera.html?_r=1</a>  </p><p>"...who's fighting for them and who's not."  Yup.  Dithering...<em>will campaign season give him some...mettle?</em></p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:32:06 +0000 we are stardust comment 123972 at http://dagblog.com Niiiiiice. http://dagblog.com/comment/123969#comment-123969 <a id="comment-123969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123961#comment-123961">We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Niiiiiice.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:12:25 +0000 we are stardust comment 123969 at http://dagblog.com Oopsie; the link went to a http://dagblog.com/comment/123968#comment-123968 <a id="comment-123968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123957#comment-123957">Joe Nocera&#039;s column today</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oopsie; the link went to a Rubenfeld (?) column.  Errrr, he mentions the Thomas Drake prosecution.  Crap prosecution, brave and good Whistleblower.  Sure; this administration loves a fight, Joe...</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:10:44 +0000 we are stardust comment 123968 at http://dagblog.com Joe is late to the http://dagblog.com/comment/123962#comment-123962 <a id="comment-123962"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/123957#comment-123957">Joe Nocera&#039;s column today</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Joe is late to the party--that's been a widespread meme which Prez has studiously ignored, along with any other potentially galvanizing advice.  What a putz!</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:33:17 +0000 jollyroger comment 123962 at http://dagblog.com We don't need no stinkin' http://dagblog.com/comment/123961#comment-123961 <a id="comment-123961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obama-name-financial-regulators-10673">Obama to Name Financial Regulators</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><p><object width="425" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/VqomZQMZQCQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VqomZQMZQCQ" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VqomZQMZQCQ" /></object></p><p> </p><p>We don't need no stinkin' regulators...</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:31:08 +0000 jollyroger comment 123961 at http://dagblog.com Joe Nocera's column today http://dagblog.com/comment/123957#comment-123957 <a id="comment-123957"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obama-name-financial-regulators-10673">Obama to Name Financial Regulators</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/corruption-currents/2011/06/10/high-tide-from-thomas-drakes-guilty-plea-to-a-hospitalization/?mod=google_news_blog">Joe Nocera's column today</a> interestingly argues that the administration should welcome the partisan fight that nominating Warren would cause and not because she would win confirmation....</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:36:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 123957 at http://dagblog.com