dagblog - Comments for "Obama Brand Has Lost Its Mojo" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-brand-has-lost-its-mojo-10774 Comments for "Obama Brand Has Lost Its Mojo" en Barth has a good blog going, http://dagblog.com/comment/124991#comment-124991 <a id="comment-124991"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124990#comment-124990">That was such an overhyped</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Barth has a good blog going, <strong><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">A Republic, If you can keep it</span></strong>  I just listened to Rachel and Cenk (young Turks)</p> <p>Read the article from Krugman</p> <p>If you get a chance I would definitely recommend.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:18:18 +0000 Resistance comment 124991 at http://dagblog.com That was such an overhyped http://dagblog.com/comment/124990#comment-124990 <a id="comment-124990"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124974#comment-124974">Do they still get a night in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That was such an overhyped scandal. A good number of the stays were school friends of Chelsea Clinton.</p><p>Versus W pretending that Enron stayed with Clinton (he phrased it for that misinterpretation - they stayed with Bush Sr.)</p><p>Press asleep or abetting as usual.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:12:16 +0000 Desider comment 124990 at http://dagblog.com Do they still get a night in http://dagblog.com/comment/124974#comment-124974 <a id="comment-124974"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124961#comment-124961">The win-a-date-with-Barack</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Do they still get a night in the Lincoln Bedroom?</p> <p>Maybe for a few dollars I could pitch a tent on the lawn?</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:06:28 +0000 Resistance comment 124974 at http://dagblog.com I gotta say, this one almost http://dagblog.com/comment/124972#comment-124972 <a id="comment-124972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124961#comment-124961">The win-a-date-with-Barack</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I gotta say, this one almost makes me physically ill. I just can't get over the fact that if you donate big money, you DEFINITELY get to have dinner with Obama. No lottery, no names from hats - you're just plain IN.</p><p>"Own a piece of the campaign" feels more like "buy a share" - when you know a few folks own 10,000,000 shares each.</p><p>Retch.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:55:44 +0000 quinn esq comment 124972 at http://dagblog.com Your local food bank will put http://dagblog.com/comment/124967#comment-124967 <a id="comment-124967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124961#comment-124961">The win-a-date-with-Barack</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your local food bank will put the $75 to better use.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:02:47 +0000 NCD comment 124967 at http://dagblog.com The win-a-date-with-Barack http://dagblog.com/comment/124961#comment-124961 <a id="comment-124961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-brand-has-lost-its-mojo-10774">Obama Brand Has Lost Its Mojo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The win-a-date-with-Barack contest is still in full swing!  And how are they able to run a swell contest like this, you ask?  It's because they <em>aren't like </em>other campaigns!!!  They don't suck up to Wall Street big shots, no sir.  It's all based on the nickels and dimes - well, OK, the $75 checks - from John and Jane Q. Public:</p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000;"><em>Dan --</em></span><br /><br /><span style="color: #000000;"><em> Since we launched our "Dinner with Barack" contest on Wednesday, we've been getting asked a lot: "Is this for real?"</em></span><br /><br /><span style="color: #000000;"><em> Yes, it is.</em></span><br /><br /><span style="color: #000000;"><em> President Obama is really going to sit down with four supporters for dinner. And if you donate to support this campaign before 11:59 p.m. on June 30th, you'll be automatically entered for the chance to be one of those guests.</em></span><br /><br /><span style="color: #000000;"><em> Make a $75 donation today:</em></span><br /><br /><em>donate.barackobama.com/Dinner-with-Barack<br /><br />We're able to put on a contest like this because this campaign isn't like other campaigns.<br /><br /> The organization we're building across the country is for supporters like you to help shape. And unlike ones that count on special-interest PACs and Washington lobbyists to foot their bills, we rely on support from grassroots donors like you. So I'm asking you to own a piece of the campaign -- and when you do, you'll get a shot at a once-in-lifetime opportunity to have dinner with the President:<br /></em></p><p><em>donate.barackobama.com/Dinner-with-Barack<br /><br /> Thanks,<br /><br /> Rufus<br /><br /> Rufus Gifford<br /> National Finance Director<br /> Obama for America</em></p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:00:08 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 124961 at http://dagblog.com Here's what he can run on. http://dagblog.com/comment/124960#comment-124960 <a id="comment-124960"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124943#comment-124943">He will probably placate the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's what he can run on.  It could have been better, but y'know, the damn system is really broken, in case you have not noticed:</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#42924888">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#42924888</a></p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:57:08 +0000 Barth comment 124960 at http://dagblog.com He doesn't have to run http://dagblog.com/comment/124957#comment-124957 <a id="comment-124957"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124955#comment-124955">That&#039;s what I&#039;d like to see,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He doesn't have to run against the things he has done.   The main problem progressives have with him lies with all the things he hasn't done, and hasn't even tried to do.  He can adopt a new progressive agenda during the cmapiagn, and then pretend it was his idea all along.</p><p>Franlkly, I think once he gets out in public pressing the flesh, as long as his consigliores let him outside the cone of silence Presidents have to live in, he's going to be shocked when he hears about the struggles of people all across this country, and will finally get why so many people think his administration is turning into such a turd.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:38:03 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 124957 at http://dagblog.com That's what I'd like to see, http://dagblog.com/comment/124955#comment-124955 <a id="comment-124955"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124951#comment-124951">We&#039;re a long way from the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's what I'd like to see, but he can't run against his own record.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:31:02 +0000 Rootman comment 124955 at http://dagblog.com We're a long way from the http://dagblog.com/comment/124951#comment-124951 <a id="comment-124951"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/124912#comment-124912">This is the problem with so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We're a long way from the election.  You can't expect people who are extremely pissed off and disappointed not to express their feelings when contacted by campaign voluteers and political operatives.   That's part of democracy - giving your leaders and their foot soldiers an earful when they ask your opinion.</p><p>And if they keep expressing their disappointment and frustration, that might finally move Obama to change his approach and positions.  So I hope they keep letting him hear the anger until he gets his ass in gear.  Maybe shame and embarrassment is the only thing that will move him.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:06:25 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 124951 at http://dagblog.com