dagblog - Comments for "Will Barack Obama Work For GE?" http://dagblog.com/politics/does-barack-obama-work-ge-10812 Comments for "Will Barack Obama Work For GE?" en Wish you could run it, http://dagblog.com/comment/125564#comment-125564 <a id="comment-125564"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125548#comment-125548">Yeah, I&#039;m all for an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wish you could run it, Destor.  You'd whip that puppy into line!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:31:54 +0000 we are stardust comment 125564 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I'm all for an http://dagblog.com/comment/125548#comment-125548 <a id="comment-125548"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125543#comment-125543">Destor, it seems there&#039;s some</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I'm all for an infrastructure bank, but it has to be independently run and accountable to the public, not run by the same bankers running the finance industry!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:46:58 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 125548 at http://dagblog.com Destor, it seems there's some http://dagblog.com/comment/125543#comment-125543 <a id="comment-125543"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/does-barack-obama-work-ge-10812">Will Barack Obama Work For GE?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Destor, it seems there's some news concerning the Repatriation Tax Holiday.  Now Shumer is for it, as are Apple, Pfizer, Duke Energy are reviving the idea, saying that the revenue (5%? of the trillion) could be used to fund an infrastructure bank.</p><p>Okay.  But this news about the small business <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57453.html">lending fund </a>($30 billion) <em>hasn't lent out a dime </em>in the nine months since its birth.  It was to be channeled through the banks, and the numbers make it look like not just small banks, and that 'small businesses' may even be the faux small businesses that folks like the Koch Bros. qualify as.  Hard to say.</p><p>But I worry that eve now that Obama is up for the idea, <strong>and the SEIU, </strong>strangely enough, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-23/former-union-leader-says-obama-ultimately-may-ease-tax-rule.html">according to Stern.</a>  What worries me is if the same Treasury Dept. will be in charge, and money again gets funneled through big banks to big concerns that have already been given tons of the stim money for say...highway paving again.  I mean there are loads of smaller projects, and more efficient ones, that would constitute as 'infrastructure'  <strong>and </strong>put Americans to work with minimal new skills to learn.  Unless it's just another way to thrust money up the economic ladder.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:24:11 +0000 we are stardust comment 125543 at http://dagblog.com OTOH. The Treasury Dept. also http://dagblog.com/comment/125438#comment-125438 <a id="comment-125438"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125327#comment-125327">Destor, I apologize for the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OTOH. The Treasury Dept. also <a href="http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2010/08/05/bush-tax-cuts-which-side-are-you-on/">came out against</a> extending the top-end Bush tax cuts. So, by that token Obama is not The Treasury Department either.</p><p>Jeff Immelt, of course, would never comment publicly either way. Not asserting I have any idea what he has or has not advised Obama, but a lack of public statements as criteria is somewhat absurd.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:09:40 +0000 kgb999 comment 125438 at http://dagblog.com It's just ONE of the things http://dagblog.com/comment/125385#comment-125385 <a id="comment-125385"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125383#comment-125383">They could set up an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's just ONE of the things Obama/Treasury could do to help.  When I was hunting for the remaining HAMP and TARP money residues, I found so many hard stories; <a href="http://www.nclr.org/index.php/about_us/news/blog/time_to_move_on_families_facing_foreclosure_need_better_solutions_than_hamp/">this from La Raza</a> damned near broke my heart.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:41:28 +0000 we are stardust comment 125385 at http://dagblog.com I remember Ezra Klein asking http://dagblog.com/comment/125384#comment-125384 <a id="comment-125384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125367#comment-125367">What reason(s) do they give</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I remember Ezra Klein asking a Treasury official about this and getting the answer that they just didn't know which homeowners to help and who to let sink.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:33:04 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 125384 at http://dagblog.com They could set up an http://dagblog.com/comment/125383#comment-125383 <a id="comment-125383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125366#comment-125366">I really thought the Dems or</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They could set up an infrastructure bank, outside of the control or even consent of Congress tomorrow if they treated it like any banking institution: let the Federal Reserve make a zero interest, non-recourse loan of $50 billion to any group of people Obama chooses and... presto.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:31:49 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 125383 at http://dagblog.com What reason(s) do they give http://dagblog.com/comment/125367#comment-125367 <a id="comment-125367"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125361#comment-125361">I don&#039;t trust these people</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What reason(s) do they give for not deploying this money?</p></div></div></div> Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:46:13 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 125367 at http://dagblog.com I really thought the Dems or http://dagblog.com/comment/125366#comment-125366 <a id="comment-125366"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125361#comment-125361">I don&#039;t trust these people</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I really thought the Dems or the White House had already traded the remaining TARP funds for some part of a deal, maybe unemployment compensaation a few months ago, and it went back into the general fund to help offset it, but I couldn't find a link the other day when I tried (in a hurry as usual).</p><p>The nations <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/under-new-pressure-from-mayors-on-spending-biden-to-rev-up-deficit-reduction-talks.php">Mayors are livid </a>(why wouldn't they be?), and the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/white-house-lawmakers-speed-up-debt-reduction-talks/2011/06/20/AGUKtZdH_story.html">debt ceiling talks</a> are looking hideous for us.  As of today, polls show a majority of Americans want us out of Afghanistan as soon as possible; Obama's about to announce cuts higher than Gates and Petraeus want, but leave out the pre-surge surge of 30,000 troops which will make it all look more like 'he fought the Generals and kicked some ass, boy, howdy'.  Feh. </p><p>Wonder how fast they could put together an Infrastructure Bank if they wanted to?  Do <em>some things to help out!</em></p></div></div></div> Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:43:46 +0000 we are stardust comment 125366 at http://dagblog.com I don't trust these people http://dagblog.com/comment/125361#comment-125361 <a id="comment-125361"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/125358#comment-125358">Well, I would go with those</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't trust these people either.  Which is why I'm often led by my skepticism.  The mere fact that this, of all things, is a topic for reasonable consideration while there's still unspent TARP money that could end the foreclosure crisis, is sickening.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:26:10 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 125361 at http://dagblog.com