dagblog - Comments for "Blogging While Female: Empowerment and Electronic Communication in a Civil Society"

I have two theories about

Donal — Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:34:13 +0000

In reply to @trope, I kind of love the

I have two theories about post-structuralism:

1 - If your beam sags, you put in another post.

2 - You build first, then design the structure to prove it will stand up.

Once you've shed the

bwakfat — Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:33:21 +0000

In reply to Once upon a time, Mudmen were

Once you've shed the arrogance of pretending to know everything, it's all amazing discovery.

(falls over in gleeful howls)

I have missed you you old such and such. I hope you are well.

I prefer klatch, as in

bwakfat — Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:28:47 +0000

In reply to Why gee Anonymous... great to

I prefer klatch, as in coffee. How utterly common to use clique, and I agree the anonymous is beyond chickenshit lame.

So sorry I didn't see your blog. I used to do official winnie-the-pooh merchandise for Target, (and it sold quite well, thank you) but I did get a bit soured on that stuffed-self-effacing-cute-silly-old-bear.

A rare affliction only known by me, some disney artists, and another hack artist from Hallmark.

Couldn't stand the taste of honey for some time after... but I digress....

Shorter Bwak: Old Spanish proverb: ...don't let the bastards grind yer balls

...dang double post. too much

Elusive Trope — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:11:31 +0000

In reply to @trope, I kind of love the

...dang double post. too much caffiene which leads to double clinking overload

well...to keep this response

Elusive Trope — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:07:33 +0000

In reply to @trope, I kind of love the

well...to keep this response to a minimum, i hope you check out my next blog which I hope to post soon (and by stating such, put the necessary pressure on my self to finish it)

You've always been the

we are stardust — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:58:41 +0000

In reply to Once upon a time, Mudmen were

You've always been the gentleman, and I've always appreciated it, though I was a little disapppointed you didn't make more of my shiny store teeth (above). Or notice I'd had the hair around my eyes cut and curled, all the better to see me you.

I do like your fringed cut-offs; Cameron Diaz is wearing some on the cover of one of the inserts in the Denver Post today, looking fresh as an apple standing in an alfalfa field. I've gotten simply too chubby to look good in those things.

But your poor goiter! Shouldn't you see somebody about that?

Once upon a time, Mudmen were

Desider — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:47:58 +0000

In reply to See, you go with his # 1

Once upon a time, Mudmen were the bomb. You'd just lather up in mud covering and wander the moonlit landscape exploring as if an alien intruder seeking out traits and qualities of a new planet. Or as a primitive people just simply trying to understand. Once you've shed the arrogance of pretending to know everything, it's all amazing discovery.

But if you need a living portrait of me to relate, here's my essence. I assume you'll be sensitive and tasteful in your comments, as I've always been to you.

See, you go with his # 1

we are stardust — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:41:43 +0000

In reply to Well, how the hell are we

See, you go with his # 1 first choice avatar, Missy Sippy; then you read the comment while imagining his Andy Devine vocalization. Then you comment on his clothes (or mud-covering). See? He keeps it simple, except for the second choice, of course.

Well, how the hell are we

Ramona — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:08:37 +0000

In reply to Well, in a blog on supposedly

Well, how the hell are we supposed to comment on your clothes if you don't even have an avatar? Jeeez.

Are we maybe losing site of

Michael Maiello — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:08:26 +0000

In reply to You know, Genghis, everything

Are we maybe losing site of the fact that this community mostly works, and, in my opinion, works better than most? Honestly, my problem with some, but not all, meta threads is that they leave the impression that some terrible things are happening around here with bullies and slanders and misrepresentations.

But that's mostly not what's happening. Now this particular "meta" thread, to the extent that even is meta, strikes me as very valuable. I know that I need to be reminded, as all writers do, that we should think more about our language choices. I didn't realize that tmccarthy0 is affected by certain language. So if that means I have to think a little before resorting to locker room talk then, hey... thinking is good!