dagblog - Comments for "Obama walks out of Debt Meeting" http://dagblog.com/link/obama-walks-out-debt-meeting-11059 Comments for "Obama walks out of Debt Meeting" en Reich is likely correct. The http://dagblog.com/comment/128088#comment-128088 <a id="comment-128088"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127930#comment-127930">I tend to go with Robert</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reich is likely correct. The McConnell plan is pure <strong>G</strong>et <strong>O</strong>bama <strong>P</strong>arty boilerplate. No solutions, not even baby steps in the right direction, scare the bejeezus out of everyone, juice up the rhetoric, do nothing at all that is necessary or good for the country, lie, and make partisan Kool-Aid for the next election. Gotta give the rubes a cause to get out and vote.  If all the nation's problems were on track to be solved The Base would stay home.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:18:12 +0000 NCD comment 128088 at http://dagblog.com Of course not. I think the http://dagblog.com/comment/128020#comment-128020 <a id="comment-128020"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128015#comment-128015">And so the position of a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course not.  I think the deal is sensible on many levels and solves more problems than it will create -- or at least in terms of governance, or what passes for governance in this country. </p> <p>But, politically, in terms of its potential for dicey voter messaging from our Republican friends, it stinks.  As I said before, I'm of two minds about it.   I think that's allowed, isn't it?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:33:11 +0000 anna am comment 128020 at http://dagblog.com And so the position of a http://dagblog.com/comment/128015#comment-128015 <a id="comment-128015"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128014#comment-128014">I get what you and Ghenghis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And so the position of a Democratic president should be that he is not going to let the Republicans give up until they force him to cut entitlements?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:02:48 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 128015 at http://dagblog.com I get what you and Ghenghis http://dagblog.com/comment/128014#comment-128014 <a id="comment-128014"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127985#comment-127985">If McConnell&#039;s proposal is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I get what you and Ghenghis are saying and you're right absolutely in the short term, and in the flat narrative.  But spin happens, and when it does it's anybody's guess what the public will forget:  it's just as likely that what will go out of their heads is the current spectacular Republican failure, along with Mitch McConnell's hand in this deal. </p> <p>He's up to no good.  And the plan is to turn this against Obama and the Democrats, which time will easily allow.  McConnell's even said as much. </p> <p>As has been pointed out time an again, US voters don't really care about the debt limit.  It's an unreal issue to them. </p> <p>But spin gets through to them. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:50:28 +0000 anna am comment 128014 at http://dagblog.com http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://dagblog.com/comment/128012#comment-128012 <a id="comment-128012"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127980#comment-127980">Didn&#039;t I hear you say you&#039;d</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnuijDieOvY">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnuijDieOvY</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:39:37 +0000 Resistance comment 128012 at http://dagblog.com Me too. http://dagblog.com/comment/128009#comment-128009 <a id="comment-128009"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127938#comment-127938">?Obama lit him up. Cantor sat</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Me too.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:07:09 +0000 anna am comment 128009 at http://dagblog.com We don't have to pay up. http://dagblog.com/comment/128001#comment-128001 <a id="comment-128001"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127996#comment-127996">Your story line sounds good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We don't have to pay up.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:50:15 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 128001 at http://dagblog.com Interesting comment. A http://dagblog.com/comment/127999#comment-127999 <a id="comment-127999"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127976#comment-127976">I really don&#039;t like it when</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting comment.</p> <p>A slightly different way to look at it is that it's demeaning to  lose perspective. Some portion of what's going must be  pure theater. And some may represent a tacit -or even overt- agreement between the negotiators.  </p> <p>Maybe  in private Cantor's a good human being who helps old ladies across the street.And we've just seen that Anthony Weiner combined impeccable positions with improper  internet flirtations...</p> <p>The first couple of times I heard worrying rumors about a candidate for whom I was working I rejected them as too much in conflict with his public positions. And was wrong.Ted Kennedy did disgrace himself at Chappaquidick; Gene McCarthy abandoned his supporters in Chicago.</p> <p>Now I just tune that stuff out and work  for the schmuck who'll vote right. Churchill in June 41::</p> <blockquote> <p>"If Hitler invaded hell , I'd at least make a favorable reference to the devil in the House of Commons". </p> <p> </p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:32:25 +0000 Flavius comment 127999 at http://dagblog.com This is straight out of "The http://dagblog.com/comment/127998#comment-127998 <a id="comment-127998"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obama-walks-out-debt-meeting-11059">Obama walks out of Debt Meeting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is straight out of "The Art of War" by Uncle Remus.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:45 +0000 Rootman comment 127998 at http://dagblog.com Your story line sounds good http://dagblog.com/comment/127996#comment-127996 <a id="comment-127996"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/127985#comment-127985">If McConnell&#039;s proposal is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your story line sounds good if it was true, but it isn't.</p> <p>We were sold into slavery. our<strike> predecessors </strike>we borrowed the money and now it's time to pay up.</p> <p>D :"For a hamburger today I'll gladly pay you Tuesday.</p> <p>R: well sorry Wimpy but you've been telling me, you'd pay me Tuesday, and it's been over 40 years now, besides I think you've been stringing me along,   I don't think you ever have any intention of paying me back, you just want to take and take and you think you don't have to pay it back. Sorry it doesn't work that way, so don't play dumb now you knew I'd expect my money.</p> <p>D: Well you have all kinds of money your rich and you can just print some up; besides if you hadn't have squandered it on wars, you might have forgotten I owed  you.</p> <p>R: Remember;  you authorized me to spend on the wars, you signed the promissory notes when you wanted the new cars and the new appliances, and you knew that someday I would want to settle our debt.  </p> <p>D: Yeah I know, but just this time again......; could you spare me some more money for a hamburger today I'll gladly pay you Tuesday</p> <p>R: No Wimpy I cant, you've borrowed so much money from me over the years, I cant pay back those I borrowed from.</p> <p>I tell my creditors,  Wimpy's good for it, but they don't believe me, they tell me I'm being blind, they ask me has Wimpy ever paid off the debt he owes you? They tell me whatever money you should have paid me back you continued to ignore your promise and instead it's reported you've been seen hanging out at the bars, running up a large tab, womanizing, running up a large tab and bumming cigarettes; smoking like theirs no tomorrow.</p> <p>You've been bumming cigarettes like you've been bumming hamburgers , and some people are sick of the way you borrow and borrow, but you never want to pay it back. Wimpy, you've gotten fat and I'm going broke supporting you  </p> <p>D: Yeah I know, but just this time again ......could you spare me some more money for a hamburger today, I'll gladly pay you Tuesday.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:05:56 +0000 Resistance comment 127996 at http://dagblog.com