dagblog - Comments for "A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/constitutional-analysis-national-debt-11090 Comments for "A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT" en Money faced Gregory is http://dagblog.com/comment/128408#comment-128408 <a id="comment-128408"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128405#comment-128405">Our forefathers ... (sigh)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Money faced Gregory is something aint he?</p> <p>I could take about four minutes and went back to the British Open.</p> <p>I would rather cheer on an Irishman than swear at some corporate frontman!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:45:08 +0000 Richard Day comment 128408 at http://dagblog.com Our forefathers ... (sigh) http://dagblog.com/comment/128405#comment-128405 <a id="comment-128405"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/constitutional-analysis-national-debt-11090">A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Our forefathers ... (sigh) ... were partisan idiots ever bit as much as we are today, they just pretended civility a lot better ... because they also had the option of dueling and killing the b*st*rds they disagreed with.  Now if I had the option to take Grover Norquist out to a cliff in New Jersey, and do an Aaron Burr on him and put a cap in *ss, I would do it in a heartbeat, wouldn't you?  Maybe, it's time we bring back personal dueling as a deterrent to idiotic partisan ranting.  We elect a bunch of sharpshooters in 2012 and then pass a dueling law, saying we are returning America to the ways of it's founding fathers.  Then, let the fun begin.   All those second amendment, NRA apologists won't be laughing so hard when our Democratic Top-Guns begin smacking them across the face with their gloves, and challenging them to duels for being intransigent on the budget talks. The party of no, will become the party of "OH NOOOO!" as Repugs clutch their chests after being shot.... Okay, did I just go a little bit too far? I did, didn't I?   I'M JUST KIDDING, of course.  My anger was just a bit revved up from watching Meet The Press and seeing that tool, David "Know Nothing" Gregory let his usual group of GOP talking points guests (with the usual one token Moderate Democrat to offer weak, and totally ignored by the others, rebuttal),  run roughshod over the truth.  Screaming at the TV on Sunday morning does strange things to one's mind and gets one thinking that violent insurrection might be the only option left.   Sorry. My head is now clearing and I see that what I wrote earlier is totally insane and I therefore disavow everything I have previous written in this comment. </p> <p>Thank you.  Remember kids, violence is never the answer.  Eat your vegetables and say your prayers ... and have a very nice day.  Oh, and God Bless America.  The End.   </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:53:05 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 128405 at http://dagblog.com hahaahahahaha Yeah what is a http://dagblog.com/comment/128383#comment-128383 <a id="comment-128383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128377#comment-128377">Thanks for the info on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahaahahahaha</p> <p>Yeah what is a decade compared to eternity?</p> <p>hahahaha</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 07:25:49 +0000 Richard Day comment 128383 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the info on http://dagblog.com/comment/128377#comment-128377 <a id="comment-128377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/constitutional-analysis-national-debt-11090">A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the info on article 5.  I plan to have some fun at my next quilt bee on Thursday.  There is a few quilters who have been saying a balanced budget amendment needs to be done before the debt ceiling is raised.  I will end it by asking if they would like to wait 10 years for their next SS check.  Hmm...time to research how long it took for the last few amendments.   </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 06:41:02 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 128377 at http://dagblog.com Gawd I despise Greenspan! http://dagblog.com/comment/128327#comment-128327 <a id="comment-128327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128300#comment-128300">Alan Greenspan, 2007, how</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gawd I despise Greenspan!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:32:49 +0000 Richard Day comment 128327 at http://dagblog.com hahaahhah http://dagblog.com/comment/128326#comment-128326 <a id="comment-128326"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/128307#comment-128307">To all those reasonable men</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahaahhah</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:31:38 +0000 Richard Day comment 128326 at http://dagblog.com To all those reasonable men http://dagblog.com/comment/128307#comment-128307 <a id="comment-128307"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/constitutional-analysis-national-debt-11090">A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To all those reasonable men who set the standard, I say: eat my knickers thou dankish, hedge-born ratsbane.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:48:05 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 128307 at http://dagblog.com Alan Greenspan, 2007, how http://dagblog.com/comment/128300#comment-128300 <a id="comment-128300"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/constitutional-analysis-national-debt-11090">A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20941413/page/4#">Alan Greenspan, 2007</a>, how George W. Bush and the Republicans bravely and valiantly avoided the imminent peril of Clintonian budget surpluses and elimination of the national debt!  The catastrophe of budget surpluses! Bush and the GOP met this challenge by giving large tax cut giveaways to the richest Americans, and, of course, wasting a trillion or two in unnecessary wars sold on lies and incompetently executed.</p> <p>It was all supposed to lead to a burgeoning economy and a permanent Republican majority, a Rovian Reich, an AEI foretold New American Century, but ended up crashing the economy and ending the American century before it even got started. An interview by Russert with the Ayn Rand 'free market' guru Greenspan:</p> <blockquote> <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 1.23; font-family: Times New Roman; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); position: relative; left: 0px;">Greenspan: 'The <strong>2001 tax cut was a very unusual tax cut in the sense<br /> that it confronted, for the first time in 150<br /> years, the possibility that we would actually<br /> eliminate the debt in the United States.</strong> And it<br /> was that concern which creates major<br /> problems with respect to accumulating assets.<br /> When you have $500 billion surpluses, when<br /> the debt is effectively zero, creates huge<br /> holdings of private assets by the federal<br /> government, and for reasons I express in the<br /> book, I think that’s very bad idea<strong>.</strong>...</span>'</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:44:09 +0000 NCD comment 128300 at http://dagblog.com