dagblog - Comments for "Advice to Democrats: Divide and Conquer" http://dagblog.com/politics/advice-democrats-divide-and-conquer-11169 Comments for "Advice to Democrats: Divide and Conquer" en Yeah, they have some problems http://dagblog.com/comment/129475#comment-129475 <a id="comment-129475"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129440#comment-129440">Oleeb, your history is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, they have some problems and I wish it were possible to actually split them but it just isn't gonna happen and even if it were within reach the Democrats, particularly under Obama, are so weak and inept they couldn't manage to exploit that weakness.  It is sad, but all too true that as disgraceful and reprehensible as the Republicans are, the Democrats match them in terms of incompetence and cowardly weakness.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:57:27 +0000 oleeb comment 129475 at http://dagblog.com I've always tried to live http://dagblog.com/comment/129470#comment-129470 <a id="comment-129470"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129417#comment-129417">I, for one, welcome the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've always tried to live there, jolly.  You'll note that I decided Obama wasn't going to benefit from my meager political largesse a little more than a year after he took office.  It was clear to me by that time he wasn't going to fight our fight in any meaningful way.  That said, I still think he'll win in 2012, and I hold out some hope that we'll look back on his presidency, if not with pride, at least with the knowledge that it was the transitional political moment that pushed the John Birch wing of our politics back into the corner they scurried out of when right-thinking folks were blinded by the genial folksiness of Ronald Reagan.</p> <p>And, are you really sure you;re the best person to be assessing the "good mental health" of others? ;) </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:02:14 +0000 brewmn comment 129470 at http://dagblog.com Oleeb, your history is http://dagblog.com/comment/129440#comment-129440 <a id="comment-129440"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129415#comment-129415">It would be nice if what you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oleeb, your history is completely right. The Republican established their impressive unity by purging liberals like Mathias, and I don't want to underestimate their ability to stand together.</p> <p>But there is also something different this year. Gingrich and DeLay fostered the young right-wing reps and used them like stormtroopers to push their agenda.</p> <p>Boehner, by contrast, is not in control of the right wing, which has an even larger presence than in Gingrich and DeLay's time. The Tea Party Republicans don't owe him anything and do not offer him allegiance. They've been virtually out of control on this debt thing.</p> <p>Political conflict is driven not only by issues but also by personalities and factional loyalties. This Republican coalition is more socially unstable than at any point since the early 90s when moderates led by Dole and faced off against Gingrich's conservatives.</p> <p>(That said, I don't really disagree about your prescriptions for Dems, who need to recover some kind of core principles.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:29:31 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 129440 at http://dagblog.com I understand the frustration, http://dagblog.com/comment/129424#comment-129424 <a id="comment-129424"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129423#comment-129423">You do know though, that if</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I understand the frustration, and don't have any easy answers. However, Republicans are as likely to tell you not to vote for Bernie because you don't want to hurt the Democrats as Democrats are to tell you not to vote for Bachmann/Palin because you don't want to hurt the Republicans. I.e., most Republicans would <em>love</em> for you to vote for Sanders. (The only ones that wouldn't be the ones who would be afraid he might actually win, just as with Democrats and Bachmann/Palin. That said, I think Bachmann/Palin are more likely than Sanders, as frightening as that sounds.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:11:31 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 129424 at http://dagblog.com You do know though, that if http://dagblog.com/comment/129423#comment-129423 <a id="comment-129423"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129400#comment-129400">Bernie: http://www.youtube.co</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You do know though, that if we push for Bernie; some will accuse us of undermining the Democrats chances in upcoming elections?</p> <p>We are told "Some day the Democrats will all think like Bernie".  Win the Future, don't vote for Bernie Now, do it in the future.</p> <p>Some Democrats and Republicans would tell us "You wouldn't want to hurt the Democrats, by voting your conscience now. Wait and keep waiting; we should take baby steps for the good of the Democratic Party"  </p> <p>Bernie speaks up in defense of many. The Democrats give lip service, "Win The Future"</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:01:44 +0000 Resistance comment 129423 at http://dagblog.com I, for one, welcome the http://dagblog.com/comment/129417#comment-129417 <a id="comment-129417"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129404#comment-129404">I can think of a few folks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I, for one, welcome the Brewman to Reality City, and look forward to his evolution towards good mental health...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:45:57 +0000 jollyroger comment 129417 at http://dagblog.com It would be nice if what you http://dagblog.com/comment/129415#comment-129415 <a id="comment-129415"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/advice-democrats-divide-and-conquer-11169">Advice to Democrats: Divide and Conquer</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It would be nice if what you are recommending was something that will work but unfortunately it is not.  Republicans are in essential agreement on every major issue and most minor issues.  They also understand that when they stick together they achieve more favorable outcomes.  No temporary fissure in that rock solid unity will have any lasting effect whatsoever on the Republicans.</p> <p>In contrast, Republicans exploit pre-existing structural and permanent divisions among those who call themselves Democrats.  The Blue Dog group of Democrats fundamentally disagree with the mainstream thinking of the Democratic Party and openly favor corporate interests over those of the common people.  These so-called centrist Democrats routinely depart from the mainstream of the Democratic Party and undermine the basic agenda the majority of Democrats seek to implement. In other words, the "centrists" are not really Democrats at all but politicians who have aligned themselves much closer tothe interests of their major corporate donors than to their constituency back home.</p> <p>The internal dynamicsof the Republican Party used to be somewhat similar to the situation found in the Democratic Parrty.  However, since 1980, right wing Republicans have driven nearly every moderate voice in the party from office.  I had dinner with Sen. Charles Mathias, a famous and well regarded Republican Senator back in the mid 80's prior to his retirement.  I was in graduate school and he was a dinner guest of our program. He stated quite unequivocally that the right wing extremists, then called "the new right" were blunt in communicating their message to Republicans like him and the message was "we don't have room for you in our party any longer: get out!"  Their efforts have been quite successful.</p> <p>Because there is really no fundamental disagreement within the Republican Party on issues, the idea that Democrats could help open up a split and exploit for anything other than this one moment of division is a nice, but impractical notion.  The only way to defeatthe Republicans is to fight them, take them head on, denounce them as the extremists they are and for Democrats to start standing for something other than their own re-election. </p> <p>Democrats in Washington from Obama on down are so craven, calculating and unprincipled that they repel voters as much as the Republicans do albeit in very different ways.  But there's no way they can either fight them or divide them if Democrats don't start standing for something.  It used to be that one knew that when all was said and done you could count on Democrats to defend Social Security, Medicare, and the interests of the common people.  Now with Obama's assault on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid he has made the message to America very clear that the people can no longer count on Democrats to be the guardians of their interests, thus making the Republicans' point for them and severely weakening every Democrat running for office in America no matter how high or low.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:17:57 +0000 oleeb comment 129415 at http://dagblog.com I can think of a few folks http://dagblog.com/comment/129404#comment-129404 <a id="comment-129404"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129334#comment-129334">Just a note from a confirmed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I can think of a few folks around here who would be surprised, and pleasantly so, to hear of this.  Of course they might just think you're cheap.  <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:37:52 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 129404 at http://dagblog.com Bernie: http://www.youtube.co http://dagblog.com/comment/129400#comment-129400 <a id="comment-129400"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/129326#comment-129326">Likewise, thanks for sharing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bernie:</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If_1T4Os270&amp;feature=player_profilepage">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If_1T4Os270&amp;feature=player_profilepage</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:15:09 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 129400 at http://dagblog.com I love this blog and agree http://dagblog.com/comment/129377#comment-129377 <a id="comment-129377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/advice-democrats-divide-and-conquer-11169">Advice to Democrats: Divide and Conquer</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I love this blog and agree with yor sentiment 100%.</div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:44:44 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 129377 at http://dagblog.com