dagblog - Comments for "The Glory that was Gre.....America" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glory-was-greamerica-11242 Comments for "The Glory that was Gre.....America" en Story of my life http://dagblog.com/comment/130388#comment-130388 <a id="comment-130388"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130367#comment-130367">You messed up the punchline.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Story of my life</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:11:11 +0000 Flavius comment 130388 at http://dagblog.com You messed up the punchline. http://dagblog.com/comment/130367#comment-130367 <a id="comment-130367"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130355#comment-130355">Dan Since this post is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You messed up the punchline. The agreement is that whoever complains about the cooking gets the job. But no matter how badly he cooks, the other hunters carefully avoid any complaints. So to try to lose the job, Charlie starts adding moose turds into the recipe (The version I heard used moose piss). One guy tastes it and says, "Hey this tastes like moose turds ... but good."</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:12:00 +0000 Donal comment 130367 at http://dagblog.com Dan Since this post is http://dagblog.com/comment/130355#comment-130355 <a id="comment-130355"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130286#comment-130286">If some people are backward</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dan</p> <p> </p> <p>Since this post is about to  make a well deserved trip to oblivion let me first actually respond to your point..</p> <p>I completely agree that the Republicans  are an unsavory mix of what you accurately describe as troglodytes   and malevolent cynics. Roughly equivalent to the Tea Party and Fox. And it's pointless to "reason" with either.</p> <p>But they,the Dems and the Independents also contain actually nice reasonable neighborly people . You must know some. Most aren't political junkies, chances are they claim they vote for the person not the party and are quite capable of voting for  Bernie Sanders and -God help us- Sarah Palin.</p> <p>We/Obama need their votes.. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that requires a "high road" approach.</p> <p>Joke:</p> <p>Some guys are on a hunting trip.The agreement is that Charlie will do the cooking but if any one complains they have to take over.</p> <p>Charlie, really sick of the deal makes a particularly disgusting meal.</p> <p>Bill: What the hell is this ?</p> <p>Charlie (complacently) Moose Turd Pie</p> <p>Bill (red faced , shouting ) Moose Turd Pie.!.....(then remembers the deal).But Good .</p> <p> .</p> <p> </p> <p>The way Obama handles the trogs and mals will decide the election.. Maybe I'm wrong that a slashing attack  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2011 05:15:05 +0000 Flavius comment 130355 at http://dagblog.com Hate the sin but not the http://dagblog.com/comment/130301#comment-130301 <a id="comment-130301"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130286#comment-130286">If some people are backward</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hate the sin but not the sinner</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:25:18 +0000 Flavius comment 130301 at http://dagblog.com Arsonists shouldn't be http://dagblog.com/comment/130287#comment-130287 <a id="comment-130287"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130263#comment-130263">Hmn. I think the President</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Arsonists shouldn't be treated with civility.  They should be treated as arsonists.  Step one: they need to be publicly identified as arsonists.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:56:04 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 130287 at http://dagblog.com If some people are backward http://dagblog.com/comment/130286#comment-130286 <a id="comment-130286"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glory-was-greamerica-11242">The Glory that was Gre.....America</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If some people are backward and ignorant troglodytes driving the country into decline and impoverishment because they don't understand the world they live in, and those people are allied with malevolent cynics who are creating decline and impoverishment on purpose as a route to personal power, it will be very hard to resist their efforts if your own message is that these folks are actually nice, reasonable, neighborly people entitled to respect, and with whom one should work and negotiate in a spirit of compromise.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:54:05 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 130286 at http://dagblog.com The President has treated the http://dagblog.com/comment/130279#comment-130279 <a id="comment-130279"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130263#comment-130263">Hmn. I think the President</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The President has treated the GOPer's with courtesy above and beyond what would be considered necessary and polite. And I ask to please tell me how they have responded to the olive branch he has extended to them? While many Democrats weren't too happy with the Supreme Court overstepping their enumerated rights as defined in the Constitution with the Bu$h v. Gore vote count, at least they gave respect to the Office of the President and the person residing within. You can't say the GOPer's have responded in kind, can you? If civility is what one expects, then one should also expect it to cut both ways too ... which it hasn't. Obama kept his Party from publicly embarrassing the GOPer's when they had the opportunity because he believed in taking the higher road. Too bad he didn't know the high road he chose to follow had so many potholes that it has made the journey far more testing than what the lower road offered. As we all now know, the low road would have been easier to maneuver around obstacles and the expectations at the end more easier to work with simply because the problems encountered on the high road were brought there from the low road the GOPer's followed instead. So the Democrats missed an opportunity by playing nice and are paying a stiff price. The only way to break out will be to use the ever increasing interest payments being attached to the bonds that will take money away from other agencies, entitlements and so forth to satisfy what's being demanded because of the stunts the GOPer's are pulling. So the Democrats have a golden opportunity to rub the GOPer's noses in the shit they've created that's going to cost us more just because they wanted to be dicks.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:36:03 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 130279 at http://dagblog.com Hmn. I think the President http://dagblog.com/comment/130263#comment-130263 <a id="comment-130263"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130199#comment-130199">When Beetlejuice suggests</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmn. I think the President ought to treat all (well, most) Republican politicians with civility even tho few actually deserve it.</p> <p>Arsonists is a good word. When I think of Grover Norquist (which I try hard not to do) the phrase auto de fe seems to spring to my lips.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2011 00:37:03 +0000 Flavius comment 130263 at http://dagblog.com When Beetlejuice suggests http://dagblog.com/comment/130199#comment-130199 <a id="comment-130199"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130195#comment-130195">I know a number of Republican</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When Beetlejuice suggests rubbing Republicans' noses in their own shit, he is obviously talking about the party representatives and leaders. The idea being to discredit them in the eyes of voters who may have supported them until now.</p> <p>Your last sentence is, I think, wrong. Obama needs to be far<em> less </em>reverential to the arsonists on the right. He should be at least as angry as most of the country is.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:06:50 +0000 acanuck comment 130199 at http://dagblog.com I know a number of Republican http://dagblog.com/comment/130195#comment-130195 <a id="comment-130195"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130178#comment-130178">Dear Sir: I&#039;m sorry to be the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know a number of Republican voters who are good human beings. I expect you do too.</p> <p>They do the sort of things  suggested by that phrase: Push your car when you're stuck in the snow, keep an eye on your kids if you have to leave the house briefly.</p> <p>A couple are "first responders", cops or firemen. Like the doomed ones caught  in photos going up the World Trade Center when everyone else was fleeing.</p> <p>Or soldiers.</p> <p>Obama didn't and shouldn't rub their noses in the shit. He's their President and just as they owe him respect, he owes it to them.</p> <p>Doesn't mean he should endorse their plans. They want a particular sort of world , that's their right. We want a different one, our right. If he can he should try and explain why for example we want to ensure that every sick American gets the kind of treatment that every sick European  gets as a matter of course.</p> <p>Maybe some will be convinced. Probably not many, but more than if he ridicules them. No one was ever  convinced by being kicked in the shins.</p> <p>As for the Republican politicians., I won't argue  they are all  good people.Some clearly aren't. But the Army explained we were saluting the uniform not the officer wearing it , and that applies here. Even Darrel Issa represents the people who, sadly, elected him and they should be respected if not he. Sure I'd be secretly pleased to see him kicked in the shins or any other part of his anatomy. But that  would be un-presidential for Obama. And more to the point, would lose him a few votes.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:19:00 +0000 Flavius comment 130195 at http://dagblog.com