dagblog - Comments for "is the norquist tax pledge constitutional?"

I agree. Please help

Mark C — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:10:42 +0000

In reply to is the norquist tax pledge constitutional?

I agree. Please help eliminate Norquist's influence by signing and forwarding this pledge:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/make-grover-norquists-tax-pledge-is/

Whoa and shut the front door!

Oxy Mora — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:57:48 +0000

Whoa and shut the front door! I like it. The little house is worried and hanging on for dear life. I'm seeing a deck of cards.

College tuition.

Roads and Bridges.

Medical Research.

And a game called, "Go Cut"

A friend drew this for me

MrSmith1 — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:16:54 +0000

In reply to Thanks, Tuxedocat. The money

A friend drew this for me after I explained the concept. The dollar sign on the moneybag is backwards, but so is the economy.

That's where the tea party is

Oxy Mora — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:02:58 +0000

In reply to It all goes back to original

That's where the tea party is headed. First, they have to fight the civil war over again, which is why Rick Perry is announcing his run at the birth place of the Secession.

Thanks, Tuxedocat. The money

Oxy Mora — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:54:01 +0000

In reply to Isn't a legislators

Thanks, Tuxedocat. The money conned from foreign interests needs to be put into the equation. I didn't know that Norquist switched from Indian tribes in the U.S. to tribes in the Middle East.

Re constituents, legislators should be confronted with,for example, poll numbers from their own districts showing the support for taxes on those making over $250K, which nationally is about 70%.

It all goes back to original

Verified Atheist — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:28:28 +0000

In reply to Isn't a legislators

It all goes back to original intent. See, when the founding fathers wrote the Constitution, people was understood to mean "white men with land".

Isn't a legislators

tuxedocat — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:43:16 +0000

In reply to is the norquist tax pledge constitutional?

Isn't a legislators responsibility to his/her constituents, we the people, and not to some guy and his foreign friends? I would posit that Norquist's outside interests (mainly in Saudi Arabia), and the republicans loyalty to those interests (via the pledge), hedges very near what I would call treason.

Ha! I think you're right.

Oxy Mora — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:16:40 +0000

In reply to I was under the impression

Ha! I think you're right.

I was under the impression

Verified Atheist — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:59:32 +0000

In reply to Now Peracles, don't go

I was under the impression that they'd already f$@ked it.

Bravo. The SeeSaw effect.

Oxy Mora — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:29:20 +0000

In reply to Perhaps linking lowering

Bravo. The SeeSaw effect. That cuts ice. In fact, the Tea Party is really the SeeSaw Party.