dagblog - Comments for "What Tools Does Obama Have Left?" http://dagblog.com/politics/what-tools-does-obama-have-left-11257 Comments for "What Tools Does Obama Have Left?" en Good question, Doc, but I http://dagblog.com/comment/130776#comment-130776 <a id="comment-130776"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130620#comment-130620">Good question, Doc, but I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p jquery1312991624301="9">Good question, Doc, but I think that you're running down the wrong path.</p> </blockquote> <p jquery1312991624301="9">I think Doc is raising a critical, not to mention welcome!--question, of how the White House intends to try to govern and get things done between now and the election.  I don't think that can be disentangled from the need to give people positive reasons to vote for him and for Democrats next fall.  Both the optics--does Obama look as though he is busy and doing things rather than low energy and maybe depressed by the weight of what he's up against?--and the substance of what he's able to get done matter a great deal, I believe, for the chances for successful presidential, and inevitably Congressional, campaigns. </p> <p jquery1312991624301="9">In part this disagreement may be one of semantics, because I see proposing legislation the Republicans will block, especially as we get closer to the election, as part of both governing and campaigning.  (elaborated on in a comment on your current thread on Why Vote for Obama?)  Proposing and fighting for legislation that will be blocked I see as part of governing because governing effectiveness depends critically on how you are perceived by the public, your congressional supporters, and your adversaries, and those in turn depend on what they see as your values and what you are trying to do.  If you're too vague and too ambiguous and too mushy on who you are and what you're trying to do, that can hurt as well as help, and I think it is on balance probably hurting Obama at this point.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:06:51 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 130776 at http://dagblog.com Let's face the matter http://dagblog.com/comment/130722#comment-130722 <a id="comment-130722"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130507#comment-130507">I&#039;ll comment at 1am Wednesday</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Let's face the matter squarely.</p> <p>As a commercial people should</p> <p>We've learned no end of a lesson</p> <p>It will do us no end of good.</p> <p>Kipling</p> <p> </p> <p>Wisconsin is a gut check. The country is <u>not </u>hungering for a strong liberal lead from Obama ....... but it's not ready to endorse the Tea Party. Yet.</p> <p>This will be unpopular here, but Obama should just keep on being Obama. If he now recasts himself as a tribune of the people, rather then generating additional votes (from whom?) it will be seen as a desperate, and insincere, change of policy. His strong suit is being an "adult" no drama Obama. It's too near the election to recast himself as LBJ so he's got to continue being Barack Obama. Which is fine with me.</p> <p>Replace Geithner, yes. He is only popular with people who wouldn't consider voting democratic. Don't worry about getting senate approval, no one will whom we ought to want in that position. And we don't want Geithner there. Give him several fulsome attaboys and throw him under the bus. Leave the Department under the nominal leadership of whomever is Geithner's highest ranking subordinate.</p> <p>But appoint Brad Delong as a special assistant to the president to actually run it. The President is entitled to direct the Treasury and if Mitch McConnell intends to abuse the Senate's right to advise and consent, Obama is entitled to make an end run around it.</p> <p>Maybe I'll write more elsewhere, this is enough for a comment in someone else's blog.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:36:00 +0000 Flavius comment 130722 at http://dagblog.com Bearing in mind that I never http://dagblog.com/comment/130632#comment-130632 <a id="comment-130632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130567#comment-130567">Yeah, I agree on that, VA. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bearing in mind that I never heard anyone but a black person use the expression, (which does not, per se, exclude the possibility that it is a racist slur directed at white people), I will cheerfully revise and retract, in the spirit of good fellowship, and substitute "punk", which is more evocative and more closely tracks my opinion of the esteemed occupant of 1600 Pa. Ave.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:13:40 +0000 jollyroger comment 130632 at http://dagblog.com Obey/Cho, please comment http://dagblog.com/comment/130622#comment-130622 <a id="comment-130622"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130618#comment-130618">Obama could offer the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obey/Cho, please comment under a consistent username. Thank you.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:16:24 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 130622 at http://dagblog.com Good question, Doc, but I http://dagblog.com/comment/130620#comment-130620 <a id="comment-130620"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-tools-does-obama-have-left-11257">What Tools Does Obama Have Left?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good question, Doc, but I think that you're running down the wrong path.</p> <p>It's August 2011. The election is just over a year away. The Republican primaries will begin in a few months. Even a president with a sterner backbone and a less dysfunctional congress wouldn't get much done at this point.</p> <p>Obama will employ the tools at his disposal to try to get re-elected and to try to get a few more Democrats elected.</p> <p>And that's where the bully pulpit comes in. It's not about weekly radio addresses. It's about giving people a reason to vote for him and for other Democrats.</p> <p>My original comment went on to address the reason, but I decided to turn it into a post: <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/why-should-you-vote-obama-11272">http://dagblog.com/politics/why-should-you-vote-obama-11272</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:11:56 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 130620 at http://dagblog.com Obama could offer the http://dagblog.com/comment/130618#comment-130618 <a id="comment-130618"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-tools-does-obama-have-left-11257">What Tools Does Obama Have Left?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama could offer the Republicans their cherished repatriation tax holiday in exchange for an extension of the payroll tax cut, unemployment insurance, and 100 billion in funds for Jared Bernstein's <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/fast-again-and-the-debt-ray-from-outer-space/">FAST proposal</a> (fixing, retrofitting public schools).</p> <p>It's a compromise that is hard to swallow, since the repatriation holiday is going to hurt revenue long-term, but it is probably the only thing that will bring the GOP to the table. And it is the only thing that will help avoid another painful recession.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:41:50 +0000 J. Bauers comment 130618 at http://dagblog.com Wow, really, Oreo? I'll tell http://dagblog.com/comment/130570#comment-130570 <a id="comment-130570"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130549#comment-130549">Disagreement is in the eye of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, really, Oreo? I'll tell you something jollyroger, what you wrote there is nothing more than any run of the mill racist would write.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:03:20 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 130570 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I agree on that, VA. http://dagblog.com/comment/130567#comment-130567 <a id="comment-130567"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130566#comment-130566">&quot;oreo&quot;? o_O I know you&#039;re not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I agree on that, VA.  Jolly, I hope you'll consider retracting that part of it.  You're funny as hell w/o crossing lines like that.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:42:29 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 130567 at http://dagblog.com "oreo"? o_O I know you're not http://dagblog.com/comment/130566#comment-130566 <a id="comment-130566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130549#comment-130549">Disagreement is in the eye of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"oreo"? o_O</p> <p>I know you're not one to stand on formality or anything, but even for your particularly relaxed style of writing that feels like crossing a line...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:29:38 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 130566 at http://dagblog.com You two--jolly and AT, the http://dagblog.com/comment/130560#comment-130560 <a id="comment-130560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/130549#comment-130549">Disagreement is in the eye of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You two--jolly and AT, the Sultan of Style and the Nabob of Nuance--crack me up.  I have an image of you two as Felix and Oscar-like (from the old TV show and movie "The Odd Couple") roommates from awhile back.  If there is ever a FTF gathering of dagbloggers, I bet you two could pull off a hysterically funny comedic gig. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:00:18 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 130560 at http://dagblog.com