dagblog - Comments for "Libya - Was Obama Right?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/libya-was-obama-right-11384 Comments for "Libya - Was Obama Right?" en Meh. The whole exchange was a http://dagblog.com/comment/132456#comment-132456 <a id="comment-132456"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132453#comment-132453">I rate this comment a Type 3,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Meh. The whole exchange was a messy stool. No substance. Just another pungent load of fluff.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:25:52 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 132456 at http://dagblog.com I rate this comment a Type 3, http://dagblog.com/comment/132453#comment-132453 <a id="comment-132453"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132449#comment-132449">Isn&#039;t it obvious? Obama</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I rate this comment a Type 3, for the cracks in the surface.</p> <p>Try harder.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Oh wait... maybe not quite so hard. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:38:41 +0000 Qnonymous comment 132453 at http://dagblog.com Isn't it obvious? Obama http://dagblog.com/comment/132449#comment-132449 <a id="comment-132449"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132442#comment-132442">Always good to see quality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Isn't it obvious? Obama critics such as yourself are not allowed to compare a blog post to human feces, but Obama supporters are welcome, nay encouraged, to do so. It's all part of our master plan to destroy the American pro-worker populist movement from within. We would have gotten away with it too if it hadn't been for you meddling liberals.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:33:23 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 132449 at http://dagblog.com Wait.what? You want him to http://dagblog.com/comment/132445#comment-132445 <a id="comment-132445"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132439#comment-132439">Crap, I was afraid that this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Wait.what? You want him to take viagra to calm down? Is this some sort of side effect or are you relying on distraction? There are? OTHER pills are blue? Huh. Who knew? Carry on, then...</div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:00:47 +0000 jollyroger comment 132445 at http://dagblog.com Always good to see quality http://dagblog.com/comment/132442#comment-132442 <a id="comment-132442"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132435#comment-132435">See, A-man already jumped</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Always good to see quality turd-management procedures in place.</p> <p>P.S. Though it seems as if maybe you should post up a list of who can - and can't - voice their opinion that a blog is "crap" around here. Unless you decide instead to just follow the historic tide and not worry about such things. Which might be advisable.</p> <p>P.P.S. No need to be over-sensitive. So I said the blog was a "type 7 stool." Big deal. Blogs and ideas and comments and bloggers get called worse than that a dozen times a day round here. Same with the fact that I didn't like the way the blogger dealt with Destor. Ditto. I didn't. It's part of what made the blog a Type 7. But same as the other day - people are getting all twitchy. I'm sure NCD isn't crying too many tears over my dastardly comment and attached poo chart.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 02:16:00 +0000 Qnonymous comment 132442 at http://dagblog.com Ok, no Wrasslin. http://dagblog.com/comment/132440#comment-132440 <a id="comment-132440"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132439#comment-132439">Crap, I was afraid that this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Ok, no Wrasslin.</div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:30:48 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 132440 at http://dagblog.com Crap, I was afraid that this http://dagblog.com/comment/132439#comment-132439 <a id="comment-132439"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132437#comment-132437">I actually don&#039;t have any</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Crap, I was afraid that this might happen. Destor, it's time for you to take your blue pills. You don't want to the nice Genghis man to be upset with you, do you?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:29:11 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 132439 at http://dagblog.com I actually don't have any http://dagblog.com/comment/132437#comment-132437 <a id="comment-132437"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132435#comment-132435">See, A-man already jumped</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I actually don't have any problems with NCD (or anyone) quoting me, disagreeing with me, agreeing with me, prasing me, criticizing me or whatever.  I write to be read.  I'm flattered that NCD cares enough to read and cite what I've published either under my own name or my nomme de blogue...</p> <p>Whooo! The Nature Boy of Blogging.  Stylin'. Profilin'.  Kiss'n all the girls and makin' them cry.  NCD!  Whoo!  I'm Space Mountain, baby!  They line up as soon as the park opens.  To be the man, you've gotta outblog the man.  WHOOOOO!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:11:00 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 132437 at http://dagblog.com See, A-man already jumped http://dagblog.com/comment/132435#comment-132435 <a id="comment-132435"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132430#comment-132430">OMG, you&#039;re actually gonna</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>See, A-man already jumped into that discussion, and if destor isn't satisfied, I'm sure that he will let us know.</p> <p>But destor's satisfaction isn't your problem, nor is the policing of dagblog, though I thank you for your keen interest in helping us keep the bathroom pristine. (Great job with the flushing. It think that it almost went down this time.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:51:07 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 132435 at http://dagblog.com OMG, you're actually gonna http://dagblog.com/comment/132430#comment-132430 <a id="comment-132430"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/132427#comment-132427">Thank you, Quinn, for once</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OMG, you're actually gonna try and quality control this turdfest. A blog consisting of instant "Obama Got It Right" analysis, coming just weeks after "our guys" finished executing one of their own major leaders, and we don't even know who's where in Tripoli. Genius. Must be a full 40 words before the naming of other bloggers begins (hmmmm, I coulda sworn we ran into this issue..... whoops... memory erased....)... followed by really very nasty personal comments about Destor's <strong>REAL-LIFE </strong>work, past and present. Gee, if only I'd thought to go there earlier, eh? I can now smear pretty much anything Destor says apparently.  </p> <p>Look G, shit is shit - and damned if this piece can be tarted up. When a blog is bad enough, rank enough, it's a waste of time trying to lipstick it.</p> <p>It needs to be flushed.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:28:44 +0000 Qnonymous comment 132430 at http://dagblog.com