dagblog - Comments for "Alan Krueger Appointment: It&#039;s about the public spectacle, stupid!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/alan-krueger-appointment-its-about-public-spectacle-stupid-11437 Comments for "Alan Krueger Appointment: It's about the public spectacle, stupid!" en Dan, I agree with what you're http://dagblog.com/comment/133106#comment-133106 <a id="comment-133106"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133102#comment-133102">I agree it&#039;s not too late. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Dan, I agree with what you're saying, and very well put. If Obama doesn't come out with something really significant in a jobs program, he is going to be dead in the water. I think he has an opportunity to regroup and I hope he does. We'll know shortly.</span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:25:41 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 133106 at http://dagblog.com I agree it's not too late. http://dagblog.com/comment/133102#comment-133102 <a id="comment-133102"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133094#comment-133094">I agree that the headlines</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree it's not too late.  But it will be too late if Obama talks himself into ineffective half-measures and quarter-measures, designed more to massage the headlines than change the direction of the country.</p> <p>I don't know how he adjusts politically to a situation in which he and the Republican Congress have collectively driven us in the wrong direction for well over a year.  How does he chart a new course?  Because if he just stays the course, we're sunk - and so is he.</p> <p>Frankly, I think we're likely just to get some 9/11 anniversary "come together" falderal, which might give Obama a few new slogans to run on next year, but won't keep us out of another recession.</p> <p>Somehow, he just doesn't seem to get it.  He has convinced himself since at least January 2010 that prosperity is just around the corner, and refuses to identify and address things that are profoundly broken.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:52:15 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 133102 at http://dagblog.com Ha! No, just couldn't think http://dagblog.com/comment/133099#comment-133099 <a id="comment-133099"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133096#comment-133096">&quot;Now that&#039;s what I&#039;m talking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Ha! No, just couldn't think of the right word--for a vehicle abreast of one on the highway. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">But I do have my eye on my neighbor's dually since he's a hankerin' to buy a new one. Where I hang out in the country, if you aint got no dually, you aint got no respect. </span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:56:59 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 133099 at http://dagblog.com "Now that's what I'm talking http://dagblog.com/comment/133096#comment-133096 <a id="comment-133096"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133080#comment-133080">Thanks, Flavius. That was a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Now that's what I'm talking about!" to an adjoining Ford 250 dually with a four wheeler in it's truck bed.</p> <p>Being towed to the shop?</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:31:55 +0000 Resistance comment 133096 at http://dagblog.com I agree that the headlines http://dagblog.com/comment/133094#comment-133094 <a id="comment-133094"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133093#comment-133093">Obama&#039;s in gigantic</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">I agree that the headlines look terrible. Friday's job numbers will probably be so bad it will tank the market again. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">On the other hand, I can not subscribe to a philosophy which says "it is too late" for this or that. There is always hope. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Right now the hard numbers for June and July on such things as consumer spending, durable goods orders, etc., are surprising analysts to the upside. There was also a small increase in the price of home sales today. So there is a discrepancy between hard numbers and surveys. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">It is of course to Republicans' advantage to keep the hang dog narrative about the economy alive.</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:22:24 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 133094 at http://dagblog.com Obama's in gigantic http://dagblog.com/comment/133093#comment-133093 <a id="comment-133093"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/alan-krueger-appointment-its-about-public-spectacle-stupid-11437">Alan Krueger Appointment: It&#039;s about the public spectacle, stupid!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama's in gigantic trouble.</p> <p><a href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/08/achuthan-too-late-for-obama-on-jobs.html">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/08/achuthan-too-late-for-obama-on-jobs.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:48:47 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 133093 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, Flavius. That was a http://dagblog.com/comment/133080#comment-133080 <a id="comment-133080"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133070#comment-133070">Here&#039;s Krugman, via Brad</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks, Flavius. That was a short and crisp post by Krugman. It seems Krueger could easily replace Geithner when the occasion arises. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">I</span><span style="font-size: 14px"> must admit that when I first heard the announcement on my car radio I "heard" Krugman not Krueger, hit my fist on the dash, rolled down my driver's window in Texas and shouted, "Now that's what I'm talking about!" to an adjoining Ford 250 dually with a four wheeler in it's truck bed. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">As far as tax credits for jobs, I think that's the best idea out there. As the owner of a small company, I would definitely take advantage of it, depending of course on the amount of the credit. I think it would have to be 40 or 50% in the first year to motivate an employer who was on the fence about a new hire. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Despite the flippant title of my post, I think this is a serious move by Obama..He may in fact wring something out of this Congress. If not this appointment is important in setting  the agenda for America going into the 2012 election. Obama needs to clearly spell out the role of government for long term economic growth and unemployment, and Krueger will be a central part of that narrative. </span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:19:39 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 133080 at http://dagblog.com Here's Krugman, via Brad http://dagblog.com/comment/133070#comment-133070 <a id="comment-133070"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/alan-krueger-appointment-its-about-public-spectacle-stupid-11437">Alan Krueger Appointment: It&#039;s about the public spectacle, stupid!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><font color="#0000ff">Here's Krugman, via Brad Delong</font></p> <p> </p> <p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/"><font color="#0000ff">Economics and Politics</font></a>: [W]hile the battery lasts: Alan is a fine choice as chief economic adviser. He’s done excellent work, he’s a really good guy, whom I know pretty well, since we keep getting each others’ mail. Now the question is whether anyone in the administration listens to him….</p> <p>Alan may write about labor markets, but he knows macro and is pretty salt-water and activist by inclination, as far as I know. His advocacy of job tax credits comes from an attempt to work within political constraints, not lack of interest in more decisive solutions. And I think the administration was looking for a high-profile, first-rate economist willing to take the job, rather than tilting toward a particular field.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:01:02 +0000 Flavius comment 133070 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, Dan. Didn't mean to http://dagblog.com/comment/133036#comment-133036 <a id="comment-133036"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133033#comment-133033">The primary reason 15% of the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks, Dan. Didn't mean to underestimate the severity of the unemployment problem or propose networking as a panacea. Just that the typical economist has no interest in something so un-ivory-towerish as how a working stiff goes about getting a job,and which gives me some comfort that this guy is a somewhat different cut than his predecessors. On the other hand, I do know  a couple of family members who are not conducting very effective searches--particularly in the all important area of making the case for their own "transferable skills". I can also tell you from personal experience that looking at ads, etc., is almost pointless. </span></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:26:32 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 133036 at http://dagblog.com The primary reason 15% of the http://dagblog.com/comment/133033#comment-133033 <a id="comment-133033"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/alan-krueger-appointment-its-about-public-spectacle-stupid-11437">Alan Krueger Appointment: It&#039;s about the public spectacle, stupid!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The primary reason 15% of the country is unemployed is not that there are all kinds of great jobs out there but folks just don't know how to find them.  We are not facing a crisis of deficient networking.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:45:41 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 133033 at http://dagblog.com