dagblog - Comments for "On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don&#039;t Make Me Do This Again." http://dagblog.com/politics/having-defend-michele-bachmann-dont-make-me-do-again-11439 Comments for "On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don't Make Me Do This Again." en Well, that explains her http://dagblog.com/comment/134099#comment-134099 <a id="comment-134099"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133047#comment-133047">This just proves how people</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, that explains her displeasure over Perry's decision on the HPV virus.</p> <p>PROTECT THE WART PEOPLE!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:45:00 +0000 Anonymous comment 134099 at http://dagblog.com Are you sure she's not http://dagblog.com/comment/133110#comment-133110 <a id="comment-133110"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/having-defend-michele-bachmann-dont-make-me-do-again-11439">On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don&#039;t Make Me Do This Again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Are you sure she's not talking about Mexican migrant workers?  As in: "Who doesn't like wet-backs?"  (Just kidding)  I agree we have enough legitimate material from her, we don't need to fake any. (Besides, do we know for sure that the faking was not part of a misinformation campaign by Bachmann's own staff to discredit some of the other true gaffes?  Just wondering.  <br /><br /> As for Christ's middle name, I believe if you check the Dead Sea scrolls you'll find that in ancient Hebrew, the word 'the' was often pronounced, 'fuh',  and that instead of his middle name,  the people in that time period would have been more likely to include his title, 'The King' when saying his name, thus,  Jesus "Fuh-King" Christ ...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 31 Aug 2011 03:27:02 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 133110 at http://dagblog.com Well Michele (my belle) has http://dagblog.com/comment/133091#comment-133091 <a id="comment-133091"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/having-defend-michele-bachmann-dont-make-me-do-again-11439">On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don&#039;t Make Me Do This Again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well Michele (my belle) has spent the last decade misquoting other people or just making up quotes out of thin air.</p> <p>It is a funny misquote though. hahahahaha</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:29:06 +0000 Richard Day comment 133091 at http://dagblog.com Flip Wilson and Geraldine. http://dagblog.com/comment/133084#comment-133084 <a id="comment-133084"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133076#comment-133076">The Post Office has been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Flip Wilson and Geraldine.  They were funny! </p> <p>Bachmann is crazy like a fox.  She's a master panderer and while we're having great fun with her, she's building a fortress behind her.  That's the genius of those people.  They know which buttons to push, which weaknesses to exploit.  Onward, Christian Soldiers! </p> <p>  If she can convince the Christian Right that they're under attack she gets them on her side.  The problem is, the rest of the candidates see it, too.  They're all going to try to out-Christian the others.  That leaves Romney out, of course, since the Religious Right doesn't include Mormons.  But in the meantime we're in for God talk like we've never seen before. </p> <p>It's making me crazy but so far I'm not hearing voices.  At least I don't think I am.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:28:36 +0000 Ramona comment 133084 at http://dagblog.com Damn! http://dagblog.com/comment/133082#comment-133082 <a id="comment-133082"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133078#comment-133078">Ha! Joke&#039;s on you! Emerson</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Damn! </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:51:35 +0000 Ramona comment 133082 at http://dagblog.com Ha! Joke's on you! Emerson http://dagblog.com/comment/133078#comment-133078 <a id="comment-133078"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133067#comment-133067">Okay, okay! Etcetera is back</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ha! Joke's on you! Emerson got you to utilize "utilize" not just once, but twice!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:29:23 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 133078 at http://dagblog.com The Post Office has been http://dagblog.com/comment/133076#comment-133076 <a id="comment-133076"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/having-defend-michele-bachmann-dont-make-me-do-again-11439">On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don&#039;t Make Me Do This Again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Post Office has been stolen.</p> <p>And the mail box is locked.</p> <p>An <b>auditory hallucination</b>, or <b>paracusia</b>,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-0"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditory_hallucination#cite_note-0"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a></sup> is a form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination" title="Hallucination">hallucination</a> that involves perceiving sounds without auditory <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulus_%28physiology%29" title="Stimulus (physiology)">stimulus</a>. A common form involves hearing one or more talking voices. This may be associated with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis" title="Psychosis">psychotic</a> disorders such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia" title="Schizophrenia">schizophrenia</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mania" title="Mania">mania</a>, and holds special significance in diagnosing these conditions. There are three main categories into which the condition can fall: a person hearing a voice speak one's thoughts, a person hearing one or more voices arguing, or a person hearing a voice narrating his/her own actions.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-1"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditory_hallucination#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a></sup> However, individuals may hear voices without suffering from diagnosable <a class="mw-redirect" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_illness" title="Mental illness">mental illness</a>.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-2"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditory_hallucination#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a></sup> The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearing_Voices_Movement" title="Hearing Voices Movement">Hearing Voices Movement</a> is a support and advocacy group for people who hallucinate voices, but do not otherwise show signs of mental illness or impairment.</p> <p>GOD TOLD HER TO DO IT!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="345px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="345px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5kaiLcwHXB4" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:51:22 +0000 Richard Day comment 133076 at http://dagblog.com That's easy. None of the http://dagblog.com/comment/133071#comment-133071 <a id="comment-133071"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133069#comment-133069">Wow, is the crazed and dazed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's easy.  None of the above.  One fool is just a fool.  No harm there.  But while we're laughing at that fool, her hundreds of thousands of followers have a chance to make fools of us all. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:05:03 +0000 Ramona comment 133071 at http://dagblog.com Wow, is the crazed and dazed http://dagblog.com/comment/133069#comment-133069 <a id="comment-133069"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/having-defend-michele-bachmann-dont-make-me-do-again-11439">On having to defend Michele Bachmann. Don&#039;t Make Me Do This Again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, is the crazed and dazed Bachmann now a reverend, she can take her place next to the other flakes like Jim Jones, Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggart, (all silly jimmy’s), Ted Haggard, John Hagee, Oral Roberts, Jerry Falwell, Franklin Gramham (son of Billy), and we can’t forget the rev. Mike Huckabee. Maybe she is just channeling the fruity Pat Robertson. Isn't she suppose to be helping her husband in some "pray the gay away sessions" so he can get some of that evil "Federal Money", thats she is always railing about, hypocrite, both of them!</p> <p> </p> <p>But alas we probably will hear more or the same lies that we heard today. So who is the bigger fool, Bachmann or her followers?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:46:25 +0000 Montana comment 133069 at http://dagblog.com Okay, okay! Etcetera is back http://dagblog.com/comment/133067#comment-133067 <a id="comment-133067"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133066#comment-133066">Oh, no. Ramona. You can never</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay, okay! Etcetera is back in.  But you can't make me use "utilize".  I won't!</p> <p>This is the year for nightmares.  I blame it on Bachmann, Perry, Boehner, McConnell and now Cheney.  Sweet dreams.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:17:32 +0000 Ramona comment 133067 at http://dagblog.com