dagblog - Comments for "Obama Caves! (Was There a Doubt?)" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-caves-was-there-doubt-11455 Comments for "Obama Caves! (Was There a Doubt?)" en It's just as well. He talks http://dagblog.com/comment/133362#comment-133362 <a id="comment-133362"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-caves-was-there-doubt-11455">Obama Caves! (Was There a Doubt?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's just as well.</p> <p>He talks too  much per se, and in particular  compared to his "middle of the road" proposals. If the administration  had made any more of an issue of the date change  the  reaction  Thursday  would have been : Is <u>this</u><u> </u>why they had such a fight?  </p> <p>I'm not sure that these inadequate proposals have necessarily been wrong. Might  well have been all he could have gotten passed. But they're not worth provoking a constitutional confrontation.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:39:47 +0000 Flavius comment 133362 at http://dagblog.com required to tape record the http://dagblog.com/comment/133267#comment-133267 <a id="comment-133267"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-caves-was-there-doubt-11455">Obama Caves! (Was There a Doubt?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>required to tape record the game</em></p> <p>  As if...</p> <p>That was the <strong>original deal.   </strong>Then McConnell moved the goal posts (get it, heh heh) and now the network carrying the speech will show it as a split screen teeny tiny insert into the feed from the game.</p> <p>The other network will just show the game, period.</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:42:06 +0000 jollyroger comment 133267 at http://dagblog.com