dagblog - Comments for "Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456 Comments for "Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal" en Roland Martin agrees with http://dagblog.com/comment/133319#comment-133319 <a id="comment-133319"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133244#comment-133244">Obviously, the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/09/02/martin.obama.power/index.html?hpt=hp_t2">Roland Martin agrees with you</a>. (The part about the drones was implied, I'm sure.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:16:54 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 133319 at http://dagblog.com Two words, Love it! http://dagblog.com/comment/133285#comment-133285 <a id="comment-133285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456">Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Two words, Love it!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:48:36 +0000 GotToBeMe comment 133285 at http://dagblog.com then see how fast they agree http://dagblog.com/comment/133269#comment-133269 <a id="comment-133269"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133244#comment-133244">Obviously, the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>then see how fast they agree to let him speak on whatever night he chooses.</em></p> <p>He has asserted his right to snuff at will...I thought he would <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/prezsigint-says-al-q-slam-dollar-default-daycantor-boehner-mcconnell-custody-material-a">put McConnell et al in thje slammer</a> over the debt ceiling hoorah, but , oh no, not <strong>our</strong> fearless leader...</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:03:08 +0000 jollyroger comment 133269 at http://dagblog.com those fans hankering for http://dagblog.com/comment/133268#comment-133268 <a id="comment-133268"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133251#comment-133251">I don&#039;t understand why the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>those fans hankering for football would care more about what he has to say than the republicans in congress</em></p> <p> </p> <p> Ya got that right...I'm thinkin maybe a flyover of the blue angels followed by a little skywriting of the speech text...</p> <p><em>. </em></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:55:40 +0000 jollyroger comment 133268 at http://dagblog.com I don't understand why the http://dagblog.com/comment/133251#comment-133251 <a id="comment-133251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456">Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't understand why the president didn't just schedule his jobs talk at Lambeau Field on Sept 8th in the first place.   My guess is that even those fans hankering for football would care more about what he has to say than the republicans in congress.  He could start a new precedent... pre-game presidential addresses.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:33:33 +0000 synchronicity comment 133251 at http://dagblog.com Obviously, the Republicans http://dagblog.com/comment/133244#comment-133244 <a id="comment-133244"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456">Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obviously, the Republicans don't fear Obama. He may have to ask the military to do a legislative 'surge' and start using drone technology on the Republicans in Congress.  It would give a whole new meaning to the term 'carpet bombing', if the drones set their sights on the Republican Senate caucus room.  A few drone attacks and then see how fast they agree to let him speak on whatever night he chooses.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:24:33 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 133244 at http://dagblog.com TEA PARTY OPPOSES EVERYTHING http://dagblog.com/comment/133233#comment-133233 <a id="comment-133233"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456">Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>TEA PARTY OPPOSES EVERYTHING OBAMA IS DOING!</p> <p><em>Tea party condemns Obama for not doing anything on vacation!</em></p> <p>From a recent McClatchy cartoon.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:46:06 +0000 NCD comment 133233 at http://dagblog.com Whatevs. Your ratings have no http://dagblog.com/comment/133232#comment-133232 <a id="comment-133232"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133228#comment-133228">Good one, G. This one was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Whatevs. Your ratings have no cred anyway. Everyone knows you were just looking for an excuse to screw me.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:44:17 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 133232 at http://dagblog.com I thought that your schtick http://dagblog.com/comment/133229#comment-133229 <a id="comment-133229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133227#comment-133227">Hey, this is my schtick,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought that your schtick was grinning, lying, and cutting brush.</p> <p>(Sorry to tread on your ranch. I was already almost finished when your post came through.)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:30:27 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 133229 at http://dagblog.com Good one, G. This one was http://dagblog.com/comment/133228#comment-133228 <a id="comment-133228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/republicans-reject-obama-boehner-speech-deal-11456">Republicans Reject Obama-Boehner Speech Deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good one, G.  This one was begging to be written, and you wrote it well. </p> <p>I'd have given it a  AAA rating if you hadn't taken a dig at Bernie--out there fighting the good fight (sorry, tmac, not meant literally in this case) along with Jan Schakowsky, Henry Waxman, John Lewis and a bunch of others.  Humorlessness at one's own expense being mandatory in the blogosphere. <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:17:25 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 133228 at http://dagblog.com