dagblog - Comments for "Rick Perry beats Obama for first time in poll Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/02/123016/texas-rick-perry-beats-obama-for.html#ixzz1Wy2lFstV" http://dagblog.com/link/rick-perry-beats-obama-first-time-poll-read-more-httpwwwmcclatchydccom20110902123016texas-rick- Comments for "Rick Perry beats Obama for first time in poll Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/02/123016/texas-rick-perry-beats-obama-for.html#ixzz1Wy2lFstV" en I have to admit I was http://dagblog.com/comment/133668#comment-133668 <a id="comment-133668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133667#comment-133667">Just wanted to note here a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have to admit I was surprised to hear you describe Perry as sounding reasonable, but not having seen the clip, I'd just chalked it up to him applying some sort of veneer. Huntsman, however, <em>is</em> reasonable, at least by comparison.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:57:57 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 133668 at http://dagblog.com Just wanted to note here a http://dagblog.com/comment/133667#comment-133667 <a id="comment-133667"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133541#comment-133541">Then there&#039;s that &quot;Perry used</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just wanted to note here a few days after the fact that in my comment above I have proved myself to be full of sh*t.  It wasn't Perry I saw interviewed. It was Huntsman.</p> <p>Republicans all look alike to me. <img alt="blush" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/embaressed_smile.gif" title="blush" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:44:10 +0000 wabby comment 133667 at http://dagblog.com I'm not gonna refute you http://dagblog.com/comment/133581#comment-133581 <a id="comment-133581"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133554#comment-133554">Don&#039;t waste your time</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm not gonna refute you flavius.  I happen to think you're right.  I also think the Dems will be able to spin the fact that Perry became a multimillionaire while holding public office in their favor.  And I'm very familiar with Burrough's, so I won't bother googling mugwumps.  ;)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:16:28 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 133581 at http://dagblog.com Don't waste your time http://dagblog.com/comment/133554#comment-133554 <a id="comment-133554"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/rick-perry-beats-obama-first-time-poll-read-more-httpwwwmcclatchydccom20110902123016texas-rick-">Rick Perry beats Obama for first time in poll Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/02/123016/texas-rick-perry-beats-obama-for.html#ixzz1Wy2lFstV</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't waste your time refuting me, just setting out my view because it happens not to have been stated already.</p> <p>Obama will defeat Perry on  personal rather than fundamental  issues.</p> <p>Swing voter concern about Perry's retrograde views on abortion, gays, evolution and global warming will combine with latent affection if not approval for Obama resurrected by a two-guns-blazing Perry campaign.</p> <p>However frustrating Obama's mugwumpery (you can look it up) it's left him as a still conceivable choice on the other side of the fence.</p> <p>A corollary of my view is that we can forget about hoping for emergence of a "fighting Barack" candidate during the next 14 months. It won't pass any legislation and merely peel off some of the wump siders.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:17:00 +0000 Flavius comment 133554 at http://dagblog.com Then there's that "Perry used http://dagblog.com/comment/133541#comment-133541 <a id="comment-133541"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/rick-perry-beats-obama-first-time-poll-read-more-httpwwwmcclatchydccom20110902123016texas-rick-">Rick Perry beats Obama for first time in poll Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/02/123016/texas-rick-perry-beats-obama-for.html#ixzz1Wy2lFstV</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Then there's that "Perry used to be a Democrat" thing. Seems to me that would appeal to voters who lean towards the center. A Republican who knows how to talk to Democrats.</p> <p>Last week I caught an extended interview with Perry on PBS, if I recall the network correctly, and he sounded so damned <em>reasonable</em>. I found myself saying out loud, "Oh. Shit. There's gonna be some trouble with <u>this</u> guy."</p> <p>If the election were held today, well, I don't know if people would exactly vote <em>for</em> Perry, but I would reckon they wouldn't mind voting <em>against</em> Obama simply because people vote their pocketbook....it's an old saying that has held its meaning. People more often know what they <em>don't</em> like better than what they do like and people don't like not having job opportunities.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:08:26 +0000 wabby comment 133541 at http://dagblog.com I would argue that, based on http://dagblog.com/comment/133535#comment-133535 <a id="comment-133535"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133534#comment-133534">of course, the quote can also</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would argue that, based on my definition of the word "progress", that the quote cannot be applied to the tea party protesters. Most of them would probably agree, as what they're wanting is to return to the mythical good ol' times. That said, it's true that one could substitute the word "change" for "progress" in the quote and it would still be true. However, the point of the quote (to me, at least) isn't to embrace unreasonableness <em>per se</em>, but rather to point out its necessity as a means to an end. As an analogy, fire is necessary for modern civilization, but it can also be very destructive.</p> <p>That said, I'm afraid that I'm personally every bit as "reasonable" as you are.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:29:42 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 133535 at http://dagblog.com of course, the quote can also http://dagblog.com/comment/133534#comment-133534 <a id="comment-133534"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133506#comment-133506">You&#039;re being unreasonable,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>of course, the quote can also be applied to all the tea party protesters.  so is progress is something we should embrace unconditionally?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:43:49 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 133534 at http://dagblog.com Against the kumbaya http://dagblog.com/comment/133533#comment-133533 <a id="comment-133533"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133515#comment-133515">The Tea Party rejects the old</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Against the kumbaya president, they'll win.</p> <p>Can't we all just get along? </p> <p><a href="http://www.truth-out.org/goodbye-all-reflections-gop-operative-who-left-cult/1314907779">http://www.truth-out.org/goodbye-all-reflections-gop-operative-who-left-cult/1314907779</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:23:10 +0000 Resistance comment 133533 at http://dagblog.com Shh! Don't let it get http://dagblog.com/comment/133516#comment-133516 <a id="comment-133516"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/133506#comment-133506">You&#039;re being unreasonable,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Shh! Don't let it get around.</p> <p>PS Nice quote</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:44:52 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 133516 at http://dagblog.com The Tea Party rejects the old http://dagblog.com/comment/133515#comment-133515 <a id="comment-133515"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/rick-perry-beats-obama-first-time-poll-read-more-httpwwwmcclatchydccom20110902123016texas-rick-">Rick Perry beats Obama for first time in poll Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/02/123016/texas-rick-perry-beats-obama-for.html#ixzz1Wy2lFstV</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Tea Party rejects the old Republican Party represented by Bush, the previous governor of Texas.  The current governor of Texas is seen as a refreshing and bold break from the past! Ironic is it not!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:19:17 +0000 NCD comment 133515 at http://dagblog.com