dagblog - Comments for "Will Perry perchance pivot? Possibly." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/can-perry-perhaps-possibly-pivot-11681 Comments for "Will Perry perchance pivot? Possibly." en Unelectable Perry finally http://dagblog.com/comment/146356#comment-146356 <a id="comment-146356"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/can-perry-perhaps-possibly-pivot-11681">Will Perry perchance pivot? Possibly.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 13px">Unelectable Perry <em>finally</em> pivots to Populism, albeit probably not propitiously.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 13px">Perry knocks the Republican establishment, Wall St. greed and Vulture Capitalism---which destroys jobs instead of create jobs.  </span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:30:51 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 146356 at http://dagblog.com Dreamer, had to re-log. http://dagblog.com/comment/135213#comment-135213 <a id="comment-135213"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135211#comment-135211">Thanks for those references.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Dreamer, had to re-log.</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:10:08 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 135213 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for those references. http://dagblog.com/comment/135211#comment-135211 <a id="comment-135211"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135207#comment-135207">Also with some points</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks for those references. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">I think my main conclusion about Perry, at least this morning, is that he will continue to get the support of the hard core right wing simply because of what he portrays, </span><span style="font-size: 14px">not what he says. Polls in the coming week or two will be telling. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">As for Christie he's simply a different animal from Perry even though he shows a similar stripe of pugnaciousness. But I think that is an innate North/South divide that will keep Perry supporters from moving to Christie. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Per Rich's article I think Perry is very vulnerable on the so called Texas miracle and job creation on which he has based his candidacy. I think Obama will dice it and slice it and it is insurance against a landslide towards Perry.  </span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:03:34 +0000 Anonymous comment 135211 at http://dagblog.com Also with some points http://dagblog.com/comment/135207#comment-135207 <a id="comment-135207"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135191#comment-135191">Thanks, Artsy. There&#039;s a lot</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Also with some points pertinent to this is Frank Rich's September 25 "In Praise of Extremism", in New York magazine, which I'll also link to in the news section:</p> <p><a href="http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/bipartisanship-2011-10/">http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/bipartisanship-2011-10/</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:01:31 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 135207 at http://dagblog.com Nate Silver had this at NYT http://dagblog.com/comment/135204#comment-135204 <a id="comment-135204"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135191#comment-135191">Thanks, Artsy. There&#039;s a lot</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver had this at NYT yesterday, on Christie, Perry and Romney:</p> <p><a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/is-christie-the-anti-perry-or-the-anti-romney/">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/is-christie-the-anti-perry-or-the-anti-romney/</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:28:12 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 135204 at http://dagblog.com Are you going to elaborate on http://dagblog.com/comment/135192#comment-135192 <a id="comment-135192"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135182#comment-135182">Well, whatever guys. After</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Are you going to elaborate on that?</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:28:38 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 135192 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, Artsy. There's a lot http://dagblog.com/comment/135191#comment-135191 <a id="comment-135191"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135188#comment-135188">Seems to me, though, there&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><br /><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks, Artsy.  There's a lot of discussion about Christie. Bloomberg News was all over it today, inviting Christie to be a guest on their show during the New Hampshire debate. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 14px">I think there is a hard core tea bagger group which wants someone who will punch out Obama, speaking metaphorically. It's almost if they just don't care about the fact that Romney is running much stronger against Obama in the general election polls so far, they want their anger and hate expressed. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 14px">As for Christie, he has taken some moderate positions which the tea baggers won't like, so I don't know if he'll pull that much support away from Perry. On the other hand Christie has that "in your face" attitude that the tea baggers love, so a big plus for him.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 14px">Isn't it interesting that the Republican base wants the most offensive candidate they can find. It's all about lambasting Obama. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 14px">But to your point about people scrambling to find someone else, I think that's very true. </span></span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:27:31 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 135191 at http://dagblog.com Ben & Jerry's next http://dagblog.com/comment/135190#comment-135190 <a id="comment-135190"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135183#comment-135183">I got the backlit part. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ben &amp; Jerry's next flavor-Phil Me Gaws</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:26:13 +0000 jollyroger comment 135190 at http://dagblog.com Seems to me, though, there's http://dagblog.com/comment/135188#comment-135188 <a id="comment-135188"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135181#comment-135181">Perry up +7 over Romney in a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seems to me, though, there's lots of evidence (see <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/24/after-perrys-debate-showing-eyes-turn-toward-christie/?scp=3&amp;sq=chris%20christie&amp;st=cse">here</a> for one example) that GOP politicos fear that won't continue, i.e., that the more GOP voters see of him, the less they will approve of him.</p> <p>I haven't watched any of the debates, just catching stuff about them in my reading here and there. From that I get the sense that this isn't at all like early on in George Bush's run for the presidency. I remember "W" as really fucking up a lot early on, and there was a lot of attention given to those fuck-ups, but the people behind him didn't seem worried, it was like they were sure they could fix the problems. I don't see that here--there's no confidence in being able to "fix" him-- instead I see people scrambling to find someone else.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:53:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 135188 at http://dagblog.com I got the backlit part. I http://dagblog.com/comment/135183#comment-135183 <a id="comment-135183"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135163#comment-135163">my reference lacked detail. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">I got the backlit part. I think. And Jerry, flannel. And Cherry Garcia. But I really don't get Schweddy Balls--I'm not sure if that just doesn't turn me off to the brand. How about a combination of Cherry Garcia, Flannel and Schweddy Balls.  Against backlit gauze. </span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:52:27 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 135183 at http://dagblog.com