dagblog - Comments for "MILITARY COUPS D'ÉTAT & SEVEN DAYS IN MAY!"

Well I bookmarked that

Richard Day — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:28:11 +0000

In reply to To add fuel to your fire ...

Well I bookmarked that link!

I just arose and yet this discussion is screwin with my spine!

When more 'modest' reasons behind certain actions on the part of government seem ridiculous; I am forced to consider more radical possibilities.

Why are not thousands at Wall Street in prison today?

Thanks for the link!

To add fuel to your fire ...

kgb999 — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:41:31 +0000

In reply to MILITARY COUPS D'ÉTAT & SEVEN DAYS IN MAY!

To add fuel to your fire ... Lynn Cheney was on the Board at Lockheed Martin all through the 90s (they had a scam with Scowcroft getting ex-soviets into NATO and then demanding they "upgrade" their militaries ... with spec sheets targeted right to Lockheed). She resigned just before he was sworn in ... but she didn't divest anything.

And as long as we're on a conspiracy-friendly thread ... did you see the deeper details of the bru-haha that led to my "WTF Is Yoo Teaching Our Youngins?" post? Downright fucking creepy (follow the link in that to the full JIP report) ... here's the best chill-factor quote.

Then Dean Chris Edley volunteered that he’d been party to very high-level discussions during Obama’s transition about prosecuting the criminals. He said they decided against it. I asked why. Two reasons: 1) it was thought that the CIA, NSA, and military would revolt, and 2) it was thought the Repugnants would retaliate by blocking every piece of legislation they tried to move (which, of course, they’ve done anyhow).

Afterwards I told him that CIA friends confirmed that Obama would have been in danger, but I added that he bent over backwards to protect the criminals, and gave as an example the DOJ’s defense (state secrets) of Jeppesen (the rendition arm of Boeing) a few days after his inauguration.

He shrugged and said they will never be prosecuted, and that sometimes politics trumps rule of law.

That's Yoo's boss, BTW. Equally creepy that this guy is in charge of a law program, IMO. Dunno, you're a lawyer. Am I crazy on thinking they should be dedicated to, well, the rule of law?

lol. The correct plural is

kgb999 — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:39:31 +0000

In reply to To pluralize coup d'etat,

lol. The correct plural is totally what first caught my eye on this. My reaction: So THAT'S the right way.

Lured to what words do, the

MrSmith1 — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:09:06 +0000

In reply to Yeah but you guys would have

Lured to what words do, the Kurds boo in urdu ... or so I've heard too.

Yeah but you guys would have

Richard Day — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:55:07 +0000

In reply to Next time, post in Urdu.

Yeah but you guys would have one hell of a time editing me when I swear in Urdu. hahahahaahahha

Next time, post in Urdu.

Donal — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:40:27 +0000

In reply to I should know that, I

Next time, post in Urdu.

hahahahahahahaahhaah Parle

Richard Day — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:40:01 +0000

In reply to Somebody trow dis bum oudda

hahahahahahahaahhaah

Parle vous Canadien? hahahaha

I just thought of something.

I mean if you are a stand-up comedienne in Quebec you would be a Canadien feminine comedienne!

I should know that, I

Richard Day — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:33:08 +0000

In reply to To pluralize coup d'etat,

I should know that, I probably do but the cheap whiskey came into play...

I did get it right, evidently in the title?

There are a couple other problems in this drivel also. haahahahah

I mean it is proper to say 'former Secretaries of State', and I come across scores of such phrases that are Latin, French or English...and I usually ponder them upon editing.

I take it that is enough groveling for now...EH?

hahahah

Somebody trow dis bum oudda

Qnonymous — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:29:36 +0000

In reply to To pluralize coup d'etat,

Somebody trow dis bum oudda hear.

Guyz comin out admittin bein a pederant.

Well, whad next? Whad udder kinda preversions dem goddamn Canuckistanis got?

So, as a pedalant, you like

MrSmith1 — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:22:54 +0000

In reply to To pluralize coup d'etat,

So, as a pedalant, you like to ride bicycles? What the heck does that have to do with the price of adjectives in China? Why, it's just an outrageous use of a non-sequitur, that's what it are, aren't it? But while you're floisting your askademia credentiability, you neglected your own little faux-ball. "Carry on?" Really? The expression, my friend, (though I am loathsome to remind you and everyone else for that matter), is to ''Kerry on"; a reference to the wind-sailing endurance of the 2004 Democratic Presidential nominee. So try to keep your ice on the ball. But I disgress. Let me get right to the pointer. What you assume to be coups d'etats, is actually a description of a car for little children, a coupe-des tots. Soooo, watch out with your literalistic remandering, and give a writer fellow a brake for frying out loud.